个人信息侵权损害赔偿责任研究
Research on Liability for Compensation for Tort Damage in Personal Information
摘要: 随着时代的发展,人们逐渐认识到个人信息所具有的社会经济价值。在大数据和互联网的飞速发展之下,个人信息极易被他人获取、利用,在未得到个人信息主体的许可下,擅自收集、使用、泄露他人个人信息的情况时有发生,由此引发的垃圾短信、诈骗电话等问题屡见不鲜,对个人信息主体的人身、财产安全造成了严重威胁。尽管现行法律在个人信息保护上发挥了重要作用,但在具体问题的解决上仍存在进一步探讨的空间。文章通过对现行法律进行梳理,在第一部分对个人信息的概念和类型进行分析,阐述损害的认定和构成要件;第二部分指出了个人信息侵权损害赔偿责任制度存在的不足,包括损害认定困难、侵权主体认定困难、因果关系证明困难三个方面;第三部分针对我国个人信息侵权损害赔偿责任制度存在的不足,结合国内外对个人信息权益保护的实践和经验,提出以下几点建议:一是放宽损害的认定标准,二是规范个人信息侵权主体认定,三是细化因果关系证明标准。
Abstract: With the development of the times, people have gradually come to recognize the socioeconomic value of personal information. With the rapid development of big data and the internet, personal information is extremely easy for others to obtain and exploit. Without the subject’s personal information, unauthorized collection, use, and leakage of others’ personal information occur frequently. Incidents such as receiving spam text messages and scam calls due to personal information leaks are common, posing a significant threat to the personal and property safety of personal information subjects. Although current laws play an important role in protecting personal information, there is still room for further discussion in solving specific issues. This article reviews current laws and, in the first part, analyzes the concept and types of personal information, explaining the determination and elements of damage; The second part points out shortcomings in the personal information infringement damage compensation system, including difficulties in determining damages, identifying the infringing party, and proving causality; The third part, addressing shortcomings in China’s personal information infringement damage compensation system and combining domestic and international practices and experiences in personal information rights protection, proposes the following suggestions: First, relax the criteria for determining damage; second, standardize the identification of personal information infringing parties; and third, refine the standards for proving causality.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王苑. 私法视域下的个人信息权益论[J]. 法治研究, 2022(5): 37-47.
|
|
[2]
|
段莉琼, 谭静宜. 大规模个人信息侵权中非物质性损害的要件认定及救济导向——广州市越秀区人民检察院与郑某、任某等个人信息保护公益诉讼案[J]. 法治论坛, 2024(1): 241-250.
|
|
[3]
|
程啸. 论个人信息权益[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2023, 26(1): 6-21.
|
|
[4]
|
叶雄彪. 个人信息侵权的理论反思与规范构建[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2023(6): 88-101.
|
|
[5]
|
钱进. 个人信息侵权的规范构造[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2023(5): 186-201.
|
|
[6]
|
田野, 张耀文. 个人信息侵权因果关系的证明困境及其破解——以相当因果关系理论为进路[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(1): 58-69.
|
|
[7]
|
朱晓峰, 夏爽. 论个人信息侵权中的损害[J]. 财经法学, 2022(4): 51-66.
|
|
[8]
|
解正山. 数据泄露损害问题研究[J]. 清华法学, 2020, 14(4): 140-158.
|
|
[9]
|
田野. 风险作为损害: 大数据时代侵权“损害”概念的革新[J]. 政治与法律, 2021(10): 25-39.
|
|
[10]
|
谢鸿飞. 个人信息泄露侵权责任构成中的“损害”——兼论风险社会中损害的观念化[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2021, 29(5): 21-37.
|
|
[11]
|
王叶刚. 个人信息处理者算法自动化决策致害的民事责任——以《个人信息保护法》第24条为中心[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2022, 36(6): 47-59.
|
|
[12]
|
张新宝. 侵权责任法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016.
|
|
[13]
|
程啸. 侵权责任法教程[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011.
|