子宫内膜癌分子分型与精准诊疗进展
Progress in Molecular Classification and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1682902, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 党有权:甘肃省武威肿瘤医院放疗四科,甘肃 武威;安存莲, 李 京:甘肃省武威肿瘤医院妇瘤科,甘肃 武威;樊 平:甘肃省武威肿瘤医院病理科,甘肃 武威;王开忠*:甘肃省武威肿瘤医院放疗一科,甘肃 武威
关键词: 子宫内膜癌;分子分型;TCGA;ProMisE;精准诊疗;Endometrial Cancer; Molecular Classification; TCGA; ProMisE; Precision Diagnosis and Treatment
摘要: 目的:综述子宫内膜癌分子分型从The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)多组学研究、Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE)临床转化至International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023分期整合的发展脉络,探讨其在预后评估、辅助治疗、免疫治疗及个体化管理中的应用价值。方法:围绕子宫内膜癌、分子分型、TCGA、ProMisE、FIGO 2023、精准治疗、免疫治疗和保留生育功能等主题,检索并梳理近年国内外代表性文献、指南和专家共识。结果:TCGA将子宫内膜癌分为DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)超突变型、微卫星不稳定高突变型、拷贝数低型和拷贝数高型,为精准分层奠定基础。ProMisE通过POLE测序、错配修复蛋白免疫组化和p53免疫组化建立了适合临床推广的分型流程。FIGO 2023分期进一步将分子特征纳入分期体系,使分子分型逐步成为影响诊断、预后和治疗决策的重要工具。结论:子宫内膜癌分子分型已成为精准诊疗的重要基础。未来应进一步推动标准化检测、真实世界验证、多组学整合及基层医院可及性建设。
Abstract: Objective: To review the development of molecular classification of endometrial cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) integrated genomic analysis and the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) to the incorporation of molecular features into the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, and to summarize its clinical value in prognostic evaluation, adjuvant therapy, immunotherapy and individualized management. Methods: A narrative review was conducted based on representative domestic and international studies, guidelines and expert consensuses related to endometrial cancer, molecular classification, TCGA, ProMisE, FIGO 2023 staging, precision treatment, immunotherapy and fertility preservation. The biological characteristics, clinical implications and application scenarios of different molecular subtypes were summarized. Results: The TCGA study di-vided endometrial cancer into four major molecular subgroups, including DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy-number low and copy-number high tumors. This classification revealed the molecular heterogeneity hidden behind traditional histopathological categories and provided a new framework for risk stratification. ProMisE simplified the TCGA classification into a clinically applicable algorithm based on POLE mutation testing, mismatch repair protein immuno-histochemistry and p53 immunohistochemistry, making molecular classification feasible in routine pathology practice. The 2023 FIGO staging system further integrated molecular features into endometrial cancer staging. Molecular classification also provides important information for adjuvant therapy selection, treatment de-escalation or escalation, immune checkpoint inhibitor use, fertility-preserving treatment and clinical trial design. Conclusion: Molecular classification has changed the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of endometrial cancer. It is increasingly important for pathological diagnosis, FIGO staging, prognostic assessment and precision treatment. Future work should focus on standardized testing procedures, cost-effective implementation, real-world validation, integration of multi-omics data and improvement of accessibility in primary hospitals.
文章引用:党有权, 安存莲, 李京, 樊平, 王开忠. 子宫内膜癌分子分型与精准诊疗进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(8): 1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1682902

参考文献

[1] Bokhman, J.V. (1983) Two Pathogenetic Types of Endometrial Carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology, 15, 10-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7
[2] Levine, D.A. (2013) Integrated Genomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma. Nature, 497, 67-73.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12113
[3] Talhouk, A., McConechy, M.K., Leung, S., Li-Chang, H.H., Kwon, J.S., Melnyk, N., et al. (2015) A Clinically Applicable Molecular-Based Classification for Endometrial Cancers. British Journal of Cancer, 113, 299-310.
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.190
[4] Talhouk, A., McConechy, M.K., Leung, S., Yang, W., Lum, A., Senz, J., et al. (2017) Confirmation of ProMisE: A Simple, Genomics‐Based Clinical Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. Cancer, 123, 802-813.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30496
[5] Kommoss, S., McConechy, M.K., Kommoss, F., Leung, S., Bunz, A., Magrill, J., et al. (2018) Final Validation of the ProMisE Molecular Classifier for Endometrial Carcinoma in a Large Population-Based Case Series. Annals of Oncology, 29, 1180-1188.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy058
[6] Berek, J.S., Matias‐Guiu, X., Creutzberg, C., Fotopoulou, C., Gaffney, D., Kehoe, S., et al. (2023) FIGO Staging of Endometrial Cancer: 2023. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 162, 383-394.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14923
[7] 中国研究型医院学会妇产科学专业委员会. 子宫内膜癌分子分型临床应用中国专家共识(2024年版) [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(6): 638-644.
[8] WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020) Female Genital Tumours. 5th Edition, International Agency for Research on Cancer.
[9] Concin, N., Matias-Guiu, X., Vergote, I., Cibula, D., Mirza, M.R., Marnitz, S., et al. (2021) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 31, 12-39.
https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230
[10] León-Castillo, A., de Boer, S.M., Powell, M.E., Mileshkin, L.R., Mackay, H.J., Leary, A., et al. (2020) Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit from Adjuvant Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38, 3388-3397.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.00549
[11] Stelloo, E., Nout, R.A., Osse, E.M., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I.J., Jobsen, J.J., Lutgens, L.C., et al. (2016) Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer—Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts. Clinical Cancer Research, 22, 4215-4224.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2878
[12] Mirza, M.R., Chase, D.M., Slomovitz, B.M., dePont Christensen, R., Novák, Z., Black, D., et al. (2023) Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 388, 2145-2158.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2216334
[13] Eskander, R.N., Sill, M.W., Beffa, L., Moore, R.G., Hope, J.M., Musa, F.B., et al. (2023) Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 388, 2159-2170.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2302312
[14] Makker, V., Colombo, N., Casado Herráez, A., Santin, A.D., Colomba, E., Miller, D.S., et al. (2022) Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 386, 437-448.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2108330
[15] Fader, A.N., Roque, D.M., Siegel, E., et al. (2018) Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Compared with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Advanced or Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress HER2/Neu. Clinical Cancer Research, 24, 3737-3743.
[16] 中国抗癌协会子宫体肿瘤专业委员会, 中华医学会妇科肿瘤学分会. 基于分子特征的子宫内膜癌保留生育功能诊治中国专家共识(2025版) [J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2025, 34(7): 481-488.
[17] 司婧文, 于秀杰, 申彦. 2023版子宫内膜癌FIGO分期更新对病理诊断内容的影响[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 241-246.
[18] 吴晓莉, 刘开江. 子宫内膜癌TCGA分子分型与治疗新进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 247-252.
[19] 李莹花, 祖菲娅·艾力. 子宫内膜癌分子分型相关的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(2): 2550-2556.
[20] 侯筱茹, 马彩玲. 子宫内膜癌从组织学到分子分型的发展过程[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(4): 356-363.
[21] 吴迪, 李明霞, 闫志风. 基于分子标志的子宫内膜癌免疫治疗模式临床研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2023, 44(10): 1172-1176.
[22] 任润玲, 闫志风, 李明霞, 等. 特殊病理类型子宫内膜癌分子分型特征及其临床应用的研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2023, 44(3): 287-292.
[23] Wortman, B.G., Bosse, T., Nout, R.A., Lutgens, L.C.H.W., van der Steen-Banasik, E.M., Westerveld, H., et al. (2018) Molecular-Integrated Risk Profile to Determine Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Endometrial Cancer: Evaluation of the Pilot Phase of the PORTEC-4a Trial. Gynecologic Oncology, 151, 69-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.020
[24] van den Heerik, A.S.V.M., Horeweg, N., Haverkort, M.A.D., Kuijsters, N., Kommoss, S., Koppe, F.L.A., et al. (2026) Molecular Profile-Based Adjuvant Treatment for Women with High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC-4a): Results of a Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3, Multicentre, Non-Inferiority Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 27, 23-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00612-6
[25] RAINBO Research Consortium (2023) Refining Adjuvant Treatment in Endometrial Cancer Based on Molecular Features: The RAINBO Clinical Trial Program. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 33, 109-117.
[26] van den Heerik, A.S.V.M., Horeweg, N., Haverkort, M.A.D., Kuijsters, N., Kommoss, S., Koppe, F.L.A., et al. (2026) Cost-Utility-Analysis of Molecular-Integrated-Profile for Women with (High)intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer—PORTEC-4a an International, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 217, Article ID: 111406.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111406