数字化学习生态下超声医学教学机制重构研究
Research on the Restructuring of Ultrasound Medical Teaching Mechanisms under the Digital Learning Ecosystem
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.158340, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 姚涵文:福建中医药大学中西医结合学院 中西医结合研究院,福建 福州;福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院,福建 福州;林钰蓉, 白晓凤:福建中医药大学中西医结合学院 中西医结合研究院,福建 福州;褚剑锋*:福建中医药大学中西医结合学院 中西医结合研究院,福建 福州;福建省中医药科学院,福建 福州
关键词: 超声医学教育数字化学习生态横断面调查研究Ultrasound Medical Education Digital Learning Ecosystem Cross-Sectional Survey
摘要: 目的:探讨数字化学习生态(指由学生、教师、人工智能、平台工具、学习资源及交互反馈共同参与构成的动态学习系统)下医学生超声学习路径、教师角色认知及评价体系与学习生态适配性的特征,分析其与学习结果之间的关系,并探索超声医学教学重构路径。方法:本研究为横断面调查研究。采用问卷调查和课程成绩分析方法,选取福建中医药大学修读超声医学相关课程的本科生126名,回收有效问卷118份,其中112名学生可完成后继问卷与成绩匹配分析。问卷围绕学习路径迁移、教师角色认知和评价体系适配性三个维度设计;同时收集理论成绩、上机操作考核成绩及病例分析成绩。采用描述性统计、组间比较及多元线性回归分析。结果:学生最常使用的学习资源为短视频、课程平台及AI辅助工具,62.7%的学生在遇到学习问题时优先检索数字资源或AI,仅12.7%的学生优先请教教师。学习路径方面,高学习路径迁移组理论成绩高于低迁移组(P < 0.001),但上机操作考核成绩差异无统计学意义(P = 0.586)。教师角色认知方面,高认知组上机操作考核成绩和病例分析成绩均高于低组(P < 0.05)。在评价体系方面,评价体系适配不足得分较高者病例分析成绩低于较低者(P = 0.002)。多元线性回归分析显示,学习路径迁移与理论成绩独立相关(P = 0.001);教师角色认知与上机操作考核成绩及病例分析成绩(P = 0.004)独立相关;评价体系与不足与病例分析成绩呈负相关(P = 0.006)。结论:数字化学习生态正在从知识输入、教学支持和评价导向三个层面重塑超声医学教学,推动其从“知识中心型”向“能力导向型”教学转型。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the characteristics of ultrasound learning pathways, teacher role perception, and the adaptability between the assessment system and the learning ecosystem among medical students within a digital learning ecosystem (a dynamic learning system jointly shaped by students, teachers, artificial intelligence, platform-based tools, learning resources, and interactive feedback), to analyze their associations with learning outcomes, and to explore potential directions for restructuring ultrasound education. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey. Questionnaire data and course performance data were collected from 126 undergraduate students taking ultrasound-related courses at Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. A total of 118 valid questionnaires were returned, of which 112 could be matched with course performance for subsequent analysis. The questionnaire covered three dimensions: learning pathway migration, perceptions of teacher roles, and the alignment between the assessment system and the learning ecosystem. Theoretical examination scores, hands-on operational assessment scores, and case-analysis scores were also collected. Descriptive statistics, between-group comparisons, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Results: The most commonly used learning resources were short videos, course platforms, and AI-assisted tools. A total of 62.7% of students reported that they first turned to digital resources or AI when encountering learning difficulties, whereas only 12.7% first consulted teachers. With respect to learning pathways, students in the high migration group had higher theoretical examination scores than those in the low migration group (P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found in hands-on operational assessment scores (P = 0.586). Regarding perceptions of teacher roles, students in the high-perception group scored higher on both hands-on operational assessment and case analysis than those in the low-perception group (both P < 0.05). Regarding the assessment system, students with higher evaluation system misalignment scores had lower case analysis scores than those with lower scores (P = 0.002). Multiple linear regression showed that learning pathway migration was independently associated with theoretical examination scores (P = 0.001); perceptions of teacher roles were independently associated with hands-on operational assessment scores (P = 0.002) and case-analysis scores (P = 0.004); and poorer alignment between the assessment system and the learning ecosystem was negatively associated with case-analysis scores (P = 0.006). Conclusion: The digital learning ecosystem is fundamentally reshaping ultrasound medical education by operating simultaneously on three levels: knowledge acquisition, pedagogical support, and evaluation frameworks. This multidimensional transformation is progressively shifting the educational model from a traditional knowledge-centric approach toward a competency-based paradigm.
文章引用:姚涵文, 林钰蓉, 白晓凤, 褚剑锋. 数字化学习生态下超声医学教学机制重构研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(8): 276-284. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.158340

参考文献

[1] 王婷婷, 林祝亮. “双高”背景下高职专业群建设研究[J]. 职业教育研究, 2021(7): 38-41.
[2] 李野, 李婧华, 邹妍琳, 等. PBL + 情景模拟在高职高专仪器分析课程中的实践与探索——以重庆三峡医药高等专科学校药品质量与安全专业为例[J]. 现代职业教育, 2025(35): 133-136.
[3] 姚涵文, 欧阳秋芳, 谢琉嘉, 等. 案例导向教学法在心脏瓣膜病的超声教学初探[J]. 教育进展, 2022, 12(7): 2591-2596.
[4] 刘雅辉, 马洪亮, 李伟, 等. 融合BOPPPS教学模型与AI技术的计算机网络课程教学改革实践[J]. 软件导刊, 2026, 25(4): 183-190.
[5] Tran, M., Balasooriya, C., Semmler, C. and Rhee, J. (2025) Generative Artificial Intelligence: The ‘More Knowledgeable Other’ in a Social Constructivist Framework of Medical Education. npj Digital Medicine, 8, Article No. 430.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01823-8
[6] Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B. and Dlamini, R. (2023) Challenges, Opportunities, and Prospects of Adopting and Using Smart Digital Technologies in Learning Environments: An Iterative Review. Heliyon, 9, e16348.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
[7] Höhne, E., Bauer, E., Bauer, C., Schäfer, V., Gotta, J., Reschke, P., et al. (2025) A Comparative Bicentric Study on Ultrasound Education for Students: App-and AI-Supported Learning versus Traditional Hands-On Instruction (AI-Teach Study). Academic Radiology, 32, 4930-4938.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.024
[8] Whewell, E., Caldwell, H., Frydenberg, M. and Andone, D. (2022) Changemakers as Digital Makers: Connecting and Co-creating. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 6691-6713.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10892-1
[9] Brockman, N. and Wong, T. (2025) Pitfalls in Point-of-Care Ultrasound. Medical Clinics of North America, 109, 253-283.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2024.08.008
[10] Brittlebank, S. and Sowers, D.J. (2024) Developing Augmentative and Alternative Communication Competence in Preservice Speech-Language Pathologists: A Collaborative Model for Clinical Educators. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00125
[11] Dong, H., Lio, J., Sherer, R. and Jiang, I. (2021) Some Learning Theories for Medical Educators. Medical Science Educator, 31, 1157-1172.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01270-6
[12] Jauregui, J., McClintock, A.H., Schrepel, C., Fainstad, T., Bierer, S.B. and Heeneman, S. (2024) You Get What You Reward: A Qualitative Study Exploring Medical Student Engagement in 2 Different Assessment Systems. Academic Medicine, 99, 1278-1285.
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005848
[13] Teichgräber, U. (2022) Keep Up with Progress—Ultrasound Education Requires Change. Medical Education, 56, 567-568.
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14764
[14] Donroe, J.H., Egger, E., Soares, S. and Sofair, A.N. (2024) Clinical Reasoning: Perspectives of Expert Clinicians on Reasoning through Complex Clinical Cases. Cureus, 16, e51696.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51696
[15] Neubauer, R., Recker, F., Weimer, J., Jenssen, C., Nürnberg, D., Karlas, T., et al. (2025) Verifying Learning Success: Assessment and Certification of Student Ultrasound Education. BMC Medical Education, 25, Article No. 851.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07469-0