核心素养视域下高中数学教材“对数函数”内容的比较研究——基于人教A版、北师大版与苏教版的量化分析
A Comparative Study of the “Logarithmic Function” Content in High School Mathematics Textbooks from the Perspective of Core Competencies—A Quantitative Analysis Based on the PEP A Edition, the BNU Edition, and the Jiangsu Education Edition
摘要: 为比较不同版本高中数学教材“对数函数”内容的编写特点,本文选取人教A版、北师大版和苏教版教材为研究对象,运用内容分析法和鲍建生综合难度模型,从章节编排、概念引入、习题系统综合难度和信息技术应用四个维度进行比较。研究发现:三版教材均依据课程标准组织内容,但在编写取向上存在差异。人教A版和北师大版更突出“函数主线”,注重指数函数、对数运算与对数函数之间的结构联系;苏教版更突出“运算主线”,强调对数运算基础和综合题目训练。习题难度方面,苏教版在运算、推理和知识综合维度上整体较高,人教A版和北师大版难度梯度相对平缓。信息技术应用方面,三版教材均关注函数图像和变化规律,但涉及内容和编排位置有所不同。基于此,教师应结合教材特点和学生学情,对情境引入、运算训练、综合习题和技术应用进行适当调适。
Abstract: To compare the compilation characteristics of the content on “logarithmic functions” in different high school mathematics textbooks, this study selects the PEP A Edition, the BNU Edition and the Jiangsu Education Edition as research objects. Using content analysis and Bao Jiansheng’s comprehensive difficulty model, the study compares the three editions from four dimensions: chapter organization, concept introduction, comprehensive difficulty of exercises, and information technology application. The results show that although the three editions are organized according to the curriculum standards, they differ in compilation orientation. The PEP A Edition and the BNU Edition highlight a function-oriented main line and emphasize the structural relationship among exponential functions, logarithmic operations and logarithmic functions, while the Jiangsu Education Edition highlights an operation-oriented main line and stresses logarithmic operations and comprehensive exercise training. In terms of exercise difficulty, the Jiangsu Education Edition shows higher levels in operation, reasoning and knowledge integration, whereas the PEP A Edition and the BNU Edition present a relatively smoother difficulty gradient. In terms of information technology application, all three editions involve function graphs and variation patterns, but differ in content coverage and arrangement. Based on these findings, teachers should adjust contextual introduction, operation training, comprehensive exercises and technology use according to textbook features and students’ learning conditions.
文章引用:邵振羽. 核心素养视域下高中数学教材“对数函数”内容的比较研究——基于人教A版、北师大版与苏教版的量化分析[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(8): 114-127. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.148585

参考文献

[1] 王保红, 韩龙淑. 数学教材研究的分层厘思[J]. 教学与管理, 2023(9): 69-72.
[2] 马吴艳. 科学使用数学教材的策略[J]. 数学大世界(下旬), 2022(12): 15-16.
[3] 齐星星. 中日高中数学教材“指数函数与对数函数”内容比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
[4] 鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[5] 王建磐, 鲍建生. 高中数学教材中例题的综合难度的国际比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014, 43(8): 101-110.
[6] 蒋志恒. 初中数学教师使用信息技术辅助教学情况的调查与思考: 以南京市秦淮区为例[J]. 数学之友, 2022, 36(14): 85-88, 91.
[7] 中华人民共和国教育部制定. 普通高中数学课程标准: 2017年版2020年修订[S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[8] 张奠宙, 宋乃庆. 数学教育概论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004.
[9] 史宁中, 林玉慈, 陶剑, 等. 关于高中数学教育中的数学核心素养: 史宁中教授访谈之七[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2017, 37(4): 8-14.
[10] 涂荣豹, 喻平. 建构主义观下的数学教学论[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2001(2): 77-82.