复杂曲面机器人抛磨路径规划与姿态平滑
Path Planning and Pose Smoothing for Robotic Polishing of Complex Surfaces
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2026.158123, PDF,   
作者: 冀泽金:沈阳理工大学机械工程学院,辽宁 沈阳;赵 元:沈阳理工大学机械工程学院,辽宁 沈阳;沈阳科技学院机械工程学院,辽宁 沈阳
关键词: 机器人抛磨NURBS曲面路径规划姿态平滑Robot Polishing NURBS Surface Path Planning Attitude Smoothing
摘要: 针对复杂曲面叶片机器人抛磨中路径覆盖难以与工艺参数对应、传统刀位姿点离散难以兼顾轮廓精度和抛磨头姿态连续性的问题,提出一种基于曲面物理映射和弦高–姿态双重约束的路径规划方法。以NURBS曲面为基础,建立参数域与实际覆盖长度的映射关系;根据抛磨头有效宽度和搭接率确定最大允许行距,据此生成加工路径框架。进一步以弦高误差和末端姿态偏转角共同确定刀位点,经过坐标转换后规划出完整的机器人抛磨路径。结果表明,所提方法在满足弦高误差要求的同时,可减小姿态变化峰值。恒力抛磨试验中,叶片表面粗糙度由Ra > 1.6 μm降至Ra = 0.312 μm。
Abstract: To address the mismatch between path coverage and process parameters, as well as the difficulty of conventional tool-pose point discretization in simultaneously ensuring profile accuracy and polishing-head orientation continuity during robotic polishing of complex blade surfaces, a path-planning method based on surface physical mapping and chord-height-orientation dual constraints is proposed. Using a NURBS representation of the blade surface, a mapping between the parametric domain and the actual coverage length is established. The maximum allowable path spacing is determined from the effective polishing width and overlap ratio, based on which the machining path framework is generated. Chord-height error and end-effector orientation deviation are then jointly used to determine tool-pose points. After coordinate transformation, a complete robotic polishing path is obtained. Results show that the proposed method satisfies the chord-height tolerance while reducing orientation-change peaks. Constant-force polishing experiments reduce the surface roughness from Ra > 1.6 μm to Ra 0.312 = μm.
文章引用:冀泽金, 赵元. 复杂曲面机器人抛磨路径规划与姿态平滑[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(8): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.158123

参考文献

[1] 黄云, 肖贵坚, 邹莱. 航空发动机叶片机器人精密砂带磨削研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3): 53-72.
[2] Wang, T., Zou, L., Wan, Q., Zhang, X., Li, Y. and Huang, Y. (2021) A High-Precision Prediction Model of Surface Roughness in Abrasive Belt Flexible Grinding of Aero-Engine Blade. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 66, 364-375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.002
[3] 张高, 刘梅军, 韩嘉琪, 等. 压气机整体叶盘修复再制造的研究进展[J]. 航空材料学报, 2024, 44(3): 65-81.
[4] 苏将兵, 廖宏谊, 苏卿双. 机器人模具抛光的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 模具工业, 2012, 38(6): 63-66.
[5] 李文辉, 温学杰, 李秀红, 等. 整体叶盘抛磨技术研究现状及其发展趋势[J]. 航空制造技术, 2022, 65(17): 88-102.
[6] 李秀红, 王嘉明, 李文辉, 等. 航空发动机铣削叶片抛磨技术研究现状及其发展趋势[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2023, 42(12): 2132-2143.
[7] Li, X., Zhao, H., Zhou, H., Cai, Y., Yin, Y. and Ding, H. (2025) Robotic Grinding and Polishing of Complex Aeroengine Blades Based on New Device Design and Variable Impedance Control. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 92, Article ID: 102875.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102875
[8] Tian, F., Lv, C., Li, Z. and Liu, G. (2016) Modeling and Control of Robotic Automatic Polishing for Curved Surfaces. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 14, 55-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.05.010
[9] 雷红华, 吴何畏. 面向机器人轮毂抛光的关节运动规划控制策略[J]. 机床与液压, 2025, 53(9): 96-104.
[10] 顾连睿, 郭国强, 江仁政, 等. 薄壁复杂结构的机器人打磨路径规划和力位控制技术现状与发展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2026, 62(5): 117-132.
[11] 邓建新, 袁邦颐, 黄秋林, 等. 基于工业机器人的复杂曲面磨抛关键技术综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(7): 1-21.
[12] 方健, 尹旷, 王红斌, 等. 机器人砂带打磨路径规划[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2021, 37(6): 1-6.
[13] Sun, Y., Feng, D. and Guo, D. (2015) An Adaptive Uniform Toolpath Generation Method for the Automatic Polishing of Complex Surfaces with Adjustable Density. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80, 1673-1683.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7140-0
[14] 张海洋, 杨文玉, 张家军, 等. 叶片机器人砂带磨抛的轨迹规划研究[J]. 机电工程, 2014, 31(5): 578-581+586.
[15] 梁子龙, 丁毓峰. 一种自由曲面抛光机器人轨迹规划方法[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2018, 37(10): 1489-1495.
[16] 张铁, 张斌. 机器人砂带磨削路径优化插补算法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2018, 29(8): 983-990.
[17] 王伟, 贠超, 张令. 机器人砂带磨削的曲面路径优化算法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(7): 8-15.