微纳制造–界面流体–智能测量交叉实践教学体系构建与评价
Construction and Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Practical Teaching System for Micro/Nano Fabrication, Interfacial Fluids, and Intelligent Measurement
摘要: 面向新工科背景下智能制造、微纳系统与科学仪器复合人才培养需求，针对传统工程课程中理论建模、工艺制造与测试评价相互割裂的问题，本文依托“基于润湿阶跃的仿生超浸润微纳器件微摩擦阻力原位解耦与高速动态减阻机制”科研选题，构建科研项目牵引的微纳制造–界面流体–智能测量交叉实践教学体系。该体系以真实科学问题为入口，将“算明机理、做精器件、测准阻力”的科研逻辑转化为“问题导入、仿真预测、器件制造、原位测量、数据反馈”的项目制教学闭环，并围绕相场/PINN多场耦合仿真、激光微纳加工与润湿阶跃构筑、双悬臂梁微摩擦原位测量三个模块重构教学内容。进一步建立OBE导向的多源评价证据链，从知识理解、工程实践、科研能力、数据素养和协同反思五个维度评价学生学习产出。研究形成了可迁移的研究一体化教学实施范式，可为地方高校依托前沿科研项目培养复合型工程创新人才提供参考。
Abstract: To meet the growing demand for interdisciplinary talents in intelligent manufacturing, micro-nano systems, and scientific instruments under the Emerging Engineering Education (EEE) initiative, this study addresses the persistent pedagogical disconnect among theoretical modeling, manufacturing processes, and testing evaluation in traditional engineering curricula. Anchored in a frontier scientific project—“In-situ decoupling of micro-friction and high-speed dynamic drag reduction mechanisms of bionic superwetting micro-nano devices based on wetting steps”—we propose a research-driven, interdisciplinary practical teaching framework that seamlessly integrates micro-nano manufacturing, interfacial fluid dynamics, and intelligent measurement. Using authentic scientific problems as the entry point, the proposed system translates the rigorous research logic of “mechanism computation, device fabrication, and precise drag measurement” into a project-based, closed-loop pedagogical process encompassing problem formulation, simulation prediction, device manufacturing, in-situ measurement, and data feedback. The curriculum is structurally reorganized around three core modules: phase-field/Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) multi-physics simulation, laser micro-nano processing for wetting step construction, and dual-cantilever-based in-situ micro-friction measurement. Furthermore, an Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) oriented multi-source evaluation evidence chain is established to systematically assess student learning outcomes across five dimensions: knowledge comprehension, engineering practice, research capability, data literacy, and collaborative reflection. Ultimately, this study establishes a highly transferable paradigm for research-teaching integration, providing a robust reference for local universities to cultivate innovative, interdisciplinary engineering talents through cutting-edge scientific research projects.
文章引用：荣婉婷, 徐慧, 张冰. 微纳制造–界面流体–智能测量交叉实践教学体系构建与评价[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 670-679. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681679

参考文献

[1] Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S. and Brodeur, D.R. (2007) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer.
[2] Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th Edition, Open University Press.
[3] Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
[4] Prince, M. (2004) Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
[5] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014) Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
[6] Felder, R.M. and Brent, R. (2003) Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 7-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
[7] Shulman, L.S. (2005) Signature Pedagogies in the Professions. Daedalus, 134, 52-59.
https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
[8] National Academy of Engineering (2004) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. The National Academies Press.
[9] ABET (2024) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024-2025. ABET.
[10] Rothstein, J.P. (2010) Slip on Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42, 89-109.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145558
[11] Yue, P., Feng, J.J., Liu, C. and Shen, J. (2004) A Diffuse-Interface Method for Simulating Two-Phase Flows of Complex Fluids. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 515, 293-317.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112004000370
[12] Naughton, J.W. and Sheplak, M. (2002) Modern Developments in Shear-Stress Measurement. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38, 515-570.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-0421(02)00031-3
[13] Wang, D., Sun, Q., Hokkanen, M.J., Zhang, C., Lin, F., Liu, Q., et al. (2020) Design of Robust Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Nature, 582, 55-59.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2331-8
[14] Rong, W., Zhang, H., Mao, Z., Chen, L. and Liu, X. (2022) Improved Stable Drag Reduction of Controllable Laser-Patterned Superwetting Surfaces Containing Bioinspired Micro/nanostructured Arrays. ACS Omega, 7, 2049-2063.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05507
[15] Rong, W., Zhang, H., Mao, Z., Chen, L. and Liu, X. (2021) Stable Drag Reduction of Anisotropic Superhydrophobic/hydrophilic Surfaces Containing Bioinspired Micro/Nanostructured Arrays by Laser Ablation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 622, Article 126712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126712
[16] Rong, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, T., Mao, Z., Liu, X. and Song, K. (2020) Drag Reduction Using Lubricant‐Impregnated Anisotropic Slippery Surfaces Inspired by Bionic Fish Scale Surfaces Containing Micro‐/Nanostructured Arrays. Advanced Engineering Materials, 23, Article 2000821.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000821

为你推荐