基于冠脉CTA的多模态特征(解剖学与血流动力学)与阻塞性冠心病的相关性及诊断预测价值研究
Correlation and Diagnostic Predictive Value of Multimodal Features (Anatomical and Hemodynamic) Derived from Coronary CTA in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
摘要: 目的:探讨基于冠状动脉CT血管造影(coronary computed tomography angiography, CCTA)提取的高级多模态衍生指标(血流动力学、局部炎症及解剖形态),对传统解剖学定义的中重度阻塞性冠心病(狭窄 ≥ 50%)的综合评估与识别价值。方法:回顾性纳入疑似冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, CAD)并接受CCTA检查的患者,依据冠脉任何一支主支狭窄是否≥ 50%分为阻塞性CAD组与非阻塞性CAD组。利用后处理工作站提取目标病变的心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)形态学指标、血管周围脂肪衰减指数(FAI)、冠脉钙化总积分(总CACS)、斑块负荷(Plaque burden)以及无创血流储备分数(CT-FFR)。采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验比较两组临床与影像基线差异,构建向后逐步多因素Logistic回归模型分析独立关联因子,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较不同联合模型的诊断效能。结果:最终纳入有效样本77例(非阻塞性CAD组16例,阻塞性CAD组61例)。结果显示,两组在性别比例、血压、心率、EAT收缩期体积(收缩期EAT体积)、FAI平均值(平均FAI)及对数斑块体积(对数斑块体积)上均无显著统计学差异(均P > 0.05)。然而,阻塞性组的平均年龄显著偏高(65.75 ± 10.37岁),且高血压、糖尿病患病率及基础服用他汀(93.4%)和阿司匹林(83.6%)的比例极显著升高。在影像学指标上,两组在总CACS、CT-FFR及斑块负荷上存在极显著差异(均P ≤ 0.005)。多因素向后逐步Logistic回归分析表明,CT-FFR是识别阻塞性CAD的强独立关联因素(OR = 0.187, P = 0.007)。ROC曲线分析显示,单纯包含局部脂肪、早期形态及功能学指标(收缩期EAT体积、平均FAI、对数斑块体积、CT-FFR)的基础模型A AUC为0.807;在此基础上引入常规斑块负荷的模型C未见显著诊断增益(AUC = 0.804);而引入总CACS构建的联合模型B诊断效能达到最优,AUC跃升至0.891 (95% CI: 0.822~0.970, P < 0.001)。结论:在评估中晚期阻塞性冠心病时,单独的局部脂肪形态与炎症指标(EAT/FAI)诊断价值有限。将反映血流动力学损害的FFR与反映解剖学硬化终态的CACS相联合,实现了多维度的正交互补,可显著提升阻塞性CAD的综合识别效能,为临床无创危险分层提供了更优的影像学策略。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the comprehensive diagnostic and identification value of advanced multimodal derived parameters (hemodynamics, local inflammation, and anatomical morphology) extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for anatomically defined moderate-to-severe obstructive coronary artery disease (stenosis ≥ 50%). Methods: Patients with suspected coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA were retrospectively enrolled. Based on whether the stenosis of any major coronary branch was ≥ 50%, patients were divided into an obstructive CAD group and a non-obstructive CAD group. Morphological metrics of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI), total coronary artery calcium score (CACS), plaque burden, and non-invasive fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) of the target lesions were extracted. Independent associated factors were analyzed using a backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression model, and the diagnostic efficacies of different combined models were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 77 valid samples were included (16 in the non-obstructive CAD group and 61 in the obstructive CAD group). There were no significant statistical differences in sex, blood pressure, heart rate, EAT systolic volume, mean FAI, and log-transformed plaque volume between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, the obstructive group showed a significantly older mean age, higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, and significantly higher proportions of baseline statin (93.4%) and aspirin (83.6%) usage. Radiologically, highly significant differences were observed in total CACS, CT-FFR, and plaque burden between the two groups (all P ≤ 0.005). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that CT-FFR was a strong independent associated factor for identifying obstructive CAD (OR = 0.187, P = 0.007). ROC curve analysis showed that the basic Model A (incorporating EAT volume, mean FAI, log-plaque volume, and CT-FFR) yielded an AUC of 0.807. The introduction of conventional plaque burden (Model C) provided no significant diagnostic increment (AUC = 0.804). In contrast, the combined Model B, which incorporated total CACS into Model A, demonstrated the optimal diagnostic efficacy, with the AUC significantly increasing to 0.891 (95% CI: 0.822~0.970, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the assessment of moderate-to-advanced obstructive CAD, the diagnostic value of isolated local fat morphology and inflammation indices (EAT/FAI) is limited. The combination of CT-FFR (reflecting hemodynamic impairment) and CACS (reflecting the anatomical end-stage of sclerosis) achieves multi-dimensional orthogonal complementarity. This combination significantly enhances the comprehensive identification efficacy of obstructive CAD, providing an optimal non-invasive imaging strategy for clinical risk stratification.
文章引用:毛小龙, 杜学松, 宫希军. 基于冠脉CTA的多模态特征(解剖学与血流动力学)与阻塞性冠心病的相关性及诊断预测价值研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(8): 1421-1429. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1682919

参考文献

[1] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(6): 625-660.
[2] Knuuti, J., Wijns, W., Saraste, A., Capodanno, D., Barbato, E., Funck-Brentano, C., et al. (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes. European Heart Journal, 41, 407-477.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
[3] Oikonomou, E.K., Marwan, M., Desai, M.Y., Mancio, J., Alashi, A., Hutt Centeno, E., et al. (2018) Non-Invasive Detection of Coronary Inflammation Using Computed Tomography and Prediction of Residual Cardiovascular Risk (The CRISP CT Study): A Post-Hoc Analysis of Prospective Outcome Data. The Lancet, 392, 929-939.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31114-0
[4] Oikonomou, E.K. and Antoniades, C. (2019) The Role of Adipose Tissue in Cardiovascular Health and Disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 16, 83-99.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0097-6
[5] 中华医学会放射学分会心胸学组, 中国医师协会放射医师分会心血管学组, 北京医学会放射学分会心血管学组. CT血流储备分数操作规范及临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2023, 57(7): 711-722.
[6] Cury, R.C., Leipsic, J., Abbara, S., Achenbach, S., Berman, D., Bittencourt, M., et al. (2022) CAD-RADS™ 2.0-2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 15, 1974-2001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.002
[7] 中华医学会放射学分会心胸学组, 等. 心脏冠状动脉CT血管成像技术规范化应用中国指南[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(10): 732-743.
[8] 单冬凯. 心外膜脂肪组织与冠状动脉粥样硬化病变关联及其诊断预测价值研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国人民解放军医学院, 2018.
[9] Antonopoulos, A.S., Sanna, F., Sabharwal, N., Thomas, S., Oikonomou, E.K., Herdman, L., et al. (2017) Detecting Human Coronary Inflammation by Imaging Perivascular Fat. Science Translational Medicine, 9, eaal2658.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal2658
[10] 中国医师协会放射医师分会. 冠状动脉CT血管成像斑块分析和应用中国专家建议[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2022, 56(6): 595-607.
[11] Greenland, P., Blaha, M.J., Budoff, M.J., Erbel, R. and Watson, K.E. (2018) Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72, 434-447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.027
[12] 唐阳阳. 基于CCTA的冠脉形态学参数联合CT-FFR及FAI预测冠脉狭窄患者心肌缺血的价值[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2025.
[13] Tesche, C., Otani, K., De Cecco, C.N., Coenen, A., De Geer, J., Kruk, M., et al. (2020) Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 13, 760-770.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.027
[14] Patel, M.R., Nørgaard, B.L., Fairbairn, T.A., Nieman, K., Akasaka, T., Berman, D.S., et al. (2020) 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFRCT: The Advance Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 13, 97-105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.003
[15] Yamaura, H., Otsuka, K., Ishikawa, H., Hojo, K., Matsumoto, K., Fujisawa, N., et al. (2025) High Levels of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Inflammation Are Associated with Coronary Atherosclerosis Independent of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Volume in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome. European Heart Journal-Imaging Methods and Practice, 3, qyaf079.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf079
[16] Lee, S.E., Chang, H.J., Sung, J.M., Park, H., Heo, R., Rizvi, A., et al. (2018) Effects of Statins on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 11, 1475-1484.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.015
[17] 曾道兵, 常婵, 赵新湘. 心脏磁共振在冠状动脉非阻塞性心肌梗死中的应用价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2020, 35(2): 177-181.
[18] 温晓玲. 心肌梗死伴二尖瓣反流患者心肌应变及房室联动效应的心脏MRI研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 四川大学, 2022.
[19] Douglas, P.S., Pontone, G., Hlatky, M.A., Patel, M.R., Norgaard, B.L., Byrne, R.A., et al. (2015) Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve by Computed Tomographic Angiography-Guided Diagnostic Strategies vs. Usual Care in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FFRCT: Outcome and Resource Impacts Study. European Heart Journal, 36, 3359-3367.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444