生态翻译学视域下海洋生态保护白皮书英译分析——以《中国的海洋生态环境保护》中濒危海洋生物语料为例
An Analysis of the English Translation of the White Paper on Marine Eco-Environmental Protection from the Perspective of Eco-Translatology—A Case Study of the Corpus on Endangered Marine Species in Marine Eco-Environmental Protection in China
摘要: 生态主题外宣文本不仅传递治理事实,也参与生态价值、责任主体与国家形象的跨语际建构。本文以《中国的海洋生态环境保护》白皮书及其英译文中濒危海洋生物语料为对象,采用目的性抽样,并结合定性细读与小规模平行语料辅助观察,在生态翻译学与生态话语分析融合视角下考察生态意义重构。研究以“三维转换”为框架,将及物性过程、参与者配置、环境成分和生态价值取向纳入语言维、文化维与交际维分析。结果表明,语言维上,译文通过过程类型和参与者重组呈现治理行动与保护责任;文化维上,通过解释性转换、伦理化保留和术语化表达再现自然观和生命观;交际维上,通过主体显化、数据保留和合作叙事提升信息清晰度、科学可信度与传播效果。总体来看,译文具有有益性生态话语特征,能够强化人与海洋和谐共生、尊重非人生命体和推动全球海洋治理合作的价值取向。
Abstract: Eco-themed international publicity texts not only convey governance facts, but also participate in the cross-linguistic construction of ecological values, responsible actors, and national image. Taking the white paper Marine Eco-Environmental Protection in China and its English translation, especially the corpus concerning endangered marine species, as the research object, this study adopts purposive sampling and combines qualitative close reading with small-scale parallel-corpus-assisted observation to examine the reconstruction of ecological meaning from an integrated perspective of eco-translatology and ecological discourse analysis. With the “three-dimensional transformations” as the analytical framework, the study incorporates transitivity processes, participant configuration, circumstantial elements, and ecological value orientation into the linguistic, cultural, and communicative dimensions. The findings show that, in the linguistic dimension, the translation presents governance actions and protection responsibilities through process types and participant restructuring; in the cultural dimension, it reproduces the source text’s views of nature and life through explicative transformation, ethical retention, and terminological rendering; in the communicative dimension, it enhances informational clarity, scientific credibility, and communication effects through subject explicitness, data retention, and cooperative narration. Overall, the translation displays features of beneficial ecological discourse and reinforces the value orientations of harmonious coexistence between humans and the ocean, respect for non-human life, and cooperation in global marine governance.
文章引用:张绍伟, 刘爽. 生态翻译学视域下海洋生态保护白皮书英译分析——以《中国的海洋生态环境保护》中濒危海洋生物语料为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 528-541. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148813

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 中国的海洋生态环境保护[R/OL]. 2024-07-11.
http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/zfbps_2279/202407/t20240711_854789.html, 2026-06-24.
[2] Alexander, R. and Stibbe, A. (2014) From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse to the Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011
[3] Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. Routledge.
[4] Stibbe, A. (2012) Animals Erased: Discourse, Ecology, and Reconnection with the Natural World. Wesleyan University Press.
[5] 何伟, 张瑞杰. 生态话语分析模式构建[J]. 中国外语, 2017, 14(5): 56-64.
[6] 何伟, 魏榕. 国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(5): 597-607, 729.
[7] 黄国文. 从生态批评话语分析到和谐话语分析[J]. 中国外语, 2018, 15(4): 39-46.
[8] 赵蕊华, 黄国文. 和谐话语分析框架及其应用[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2021, 53(1): 42-53, 159-160.
[9] 李珂. 绿色语法视角下生态关系的话语建构[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 104-118.
[10] 苗兴伟, 李珂. 主体间性视角下生态身份的话语建构[J]. 英语研究, 2022(2): 154-165.
[11] 匡芳涛, 郭璨, 邹秀佶. 汉语野生动物保护类标语及物性过程的生态话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(1): 111-121.
[12] 胡庚申. 翻译适应选择论[M]. 武汉: 湖北教育出版社, 2004.
[13] 胡庚申. 生态翻译学: 建构与诠释[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013.
[14] 胡庚申. 翻译研究“生态范式”的理论建构[J]. 中国翻译, 2019, 40(4): 24-33, 188.
[15] 胡庚申. 生态翻译学的“虚指”研究与“实指”研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2021, 44(6): 117-126, 159.