认知社会语言学视角下网络构式“X, YYDS”的变异特征与形成动因研究
A Study on the Variation Features and Motivating Factors of the Construction “X, YYDS” from the Perspective of Cognitive Sociolinguistics
摘要: 本研究以认知社会语言学为理论视角,基于2019年至2025年的微博语料,构建了网络构式“X, YYDS”的历时语料库。研究综合运用频次统计、共现分析和词向量模型等方法,考察了该构式的形成、扩散和语义演变过程。研究发现,“X, YYDS”的构式化并非单纯由高频使用驱动,而是特定社群互动、评价表达需求和认知加工机制共同作用的结果。其演变过程呈现出语言经济性、语义抽象化和认知可加工性等特征,使用场景从早期的电竞语境扩展到粉丝文化社区、身份表达等多个领域。研究识别出两种主要的变异构式:以“是”为中心的判断型构式(C1)和以人称为中心的人称指代型构式(C2)。词向量分析表明,该构式的语义边界经历了从具体赞誉到泛化评价的扩展。研究认为,该构式的形成与扩散得益于其前构式化使用基础、社群传播空间、社交互动功能和认知经济性。
Abstract: This study adopts a cognitive sociolinguistic perspective and builds a diachronic corpus of the online construction “X, YYDS” based on Weibo data from 2019 to 2025. It employs frequency statistics, co-occurrence analysis, and word embedding models to examine the formation, diffusion, and semantic evolution of the construction. The findings show that the constructionalization of “X, YYDS” is not driven solely by high-frequency use, but results from the combined effects of specific community interaction, the need for evaluative expression, and cognitive processing mechanisms. Its evolution is characterized by linguistic economy, semantic abstraction, and cognitive processability, with its usage contexts expanding from the early esports domain to fandom culture, identity expression, and other fields. The study identifies two major variant constructions: the judgment construction centered on the copular element “shi” (means “be”) (C1) and the person-reference construction centered on personal reference forms (C2). Word embedding analysis indicates that the semantic boundary of the construction has expanded from specific praise to generalized evaluation. The study argues that the formation and diffusion of this construction are facilitated by its pre-constructional usage basis, community-based space for transmission, social interactional function, and cognitive economy.
文章引用:陈俊. 认知社会语言学视角下网络构式“X, YYDS”的变异特征与形成动因研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 542-553. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148814

参考文献

[1] 施春宏. 语言调节与语言变异(上、下) [J]. 语文建设, 1999(4): 9-12, 46.
[2] 蔡淑美, 施春宏. 论构式用变和构式演变[J]. 当代修辞学, 2022(2): 58-73.
[3] Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, 4 p.
[4] 李夷. 认知社会语言学视域下的汉语四种双及物构式变异研究[J]. 外语教学, 2024, 45(5): 39-45, 83.
[5] Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G. and Peirsman, Y. (2010) Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Mouton de Gruyter, 2-10.
[6] 王梦. 国外认知社会语言学发展研究及其思考[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 47(6): 71-78.
[7] Geeraerts, D. (2016) The Sociosemiotic Commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 527-542.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0058
[8] 张天伟. 认知社会语言学前沿述评: 趋势与特点[J]. 外语教学, 2019, 40(3): 26-31.
[9] 张辉, 杨艳琴. 认知语言学的“三个轴线”与“三个层面”——第14届国际认知语言学大会侧记[J]. 山东外语教学, 2018, 39(2): 10-23.
[10] 文旭, 屈宇昕. 构式语法研究四十年[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2022(6): 19-27, 144-145.
[11] 卢毅琨. 从“YYDS”看汉语字母词的规范问题[J]. 文化学刊, 2024(3): 221-226.
[12] 刘政. 语言模因视角下网络缩写词的传播——以网络缩写词“yyds”为例[J]. 声屏世界, 2023(17): 123-125.
[13] 朱叶童, 史永霞. 网络缩写的语言特征与文化样态探析——以“YYDS”为例[J]. 汉字文化, 2022(18): 28-30.
[14] Goldberg, A.E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, 5 p.
[15] 施春宏. 构式三观: 构式语法的基本理念[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(4): 1-15.
[16] Lakoff, G. (2006) Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Ideas. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 27-48.
[17] Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) Basic Objects in Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x
[18] 文旭, 肖开容. 认知翻译学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019: 6.
[19] Rosch, E. (1978) Principles of Categorization. In: Lloyd, B. and Rosch, E., Eds., Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2-3.
[20] Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992) Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-488.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
[21] 施春宏, 马文津, 郝暾. 关于半图式构式研究的若干思考[J]. 语言、翻译与认知, 2024(1): 17-46, 152.