课程思政视域下高校跨文化交际能力培养的理论耦合、现实困境与体系建构
Theoretical Integration, Practical Challenges, and System Construction for Cultivating Cross-Cultural Communication Skills in Higher Education Institutions from the Perspective of Ideological and Political Education in Curriculum Design
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.158677, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 雪:天津体育学院传媒与艺术学院,天津;康学哲:天津体育学院体育教育学院,天津
关键词: 课程思政跨文化交际能力培养理论耦合育人困境体系建构Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education Intercultural Communication Competency Development Theoretical Integration Educational Challenges System Construction
摘要: 为破解高校跨文化教学重语言技能、轻价值塑造、重外来文化输入、轻本土文化输出的结构性问题,文章立足于课程思政育人视域,系统阐释课程思政与大学生跨文化交际能力培养的内在理论耦合机制,同时结合西方跨文化交际理论中的文化身份、文化冲击、批判性文化意识核心概念展开双向理论对话,辨析二者融合过程中存在的理论张力,探索价值引领与学术开放双向平衡路径。结合当前高校外语教学实践现状,依托面向天津区域多所本科高校外语专业发放调查问卷、开展学生跨文化能力前后测对比、选取典型院校跨文化交际课程开展课堂案例观测所得一手实证数据,深度剖析跨文化能力培养过程中存在的价值引领缺位、文化认知失衡、教学模式固化、育人体系碎片化、评价机制单一化等现实困境。在此基础上,从价值引领、内容重构、模式创新、实践拓展、评价赋能五个维度,构建“思政铸魂、文化赋能、实践落地、闭环育人”的跨文化交际能力培养体系,文中选取礼仪社交与人情往来差异单元作为落地案例,完整展示该五维体系下课程内容重构、课堂活动设计、全过程评价落地的完整实施流程,具象化呈现理论框架实操路径;其中“赋能”特指依托评价、数字化、实践资源为学生文化思辨与传播能力提供长效支撑,“闭环”指教学、实践、评价、教学优化循环迭代的完整育人链条。研究旨在实现跨文化语言教学与思政育人的深度融合,助力高校培育兼具国际视野、家国情怀、文化自信与跨文化思辨能力的新时代复合型国际化人才,高校外语课程思政的创新性发展提供理论支撑与实践指导,后续可依托调研样本院校开展体系落地试点,通过对比实验组与对照组学生跨文化素养得分完成体系应用效果量化评估,进一步验证本框架实践有效性。
Abstract: This study further engages with Western intercultural communication theories concerning cultural identity, culture shock and critical cultural awareness to mediate theoretical tensions between two paradigms, and explores balanced approaches to coordinate value guidance and open academic inquiry. To address structural issues in cross-cultural teaching—such as overemphasis on linguistic skills at the expense of value cultivation, and prioritization of foreign cultural input over local cultural dissemination—the paper examines the theoretical mechanisms linking course-based ideological education with the development of students’ cross-cultural communication abilities from this perspective. Based on current practices in university foreign language teaching, it analyzes practical challenges including inadequate value guidance, cultural perception imbalances, rigid instructional models, fragmented educational frameworks, and simplistic evaluation systems. Building upon these insights, the study proposes a comprehensive framework for cultivating cross-cultural competence through five dimensions: value orientation, content restructuring, innovative pedagogy, practical application, and evaluative empowerment—a system characterized by “ideological foundation, cultural enrichment, practical implementation, and closed-loop education.” This paper takes the teaching unit of etiquette, social interaction and interpersonal cultural differences as a concrete case to demonstrate curriculum restructuring, activity design and evaluation implementation under the five-dimensional system; “empowerment” refers to sustained support for students’ cultural critical thinking and cross-cultural communication via evaluation, digital resources and practical platforms, while “closed-loop education” denotes an iterative cycle of instruction, practice, assessment and curriculum optimization. This research aims to achieve deep integration between cross-cultural language teaching and ideological education, enabling universities to nurture versatile international talents with global vision, patriotic commitment, cultural confidence, and cross-cultural critical thinking capabilities, while providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the innovative development of course-based ideological education in foreign language programs. Subsequent pilot implementation among sampled universities and quantitative comparison of intercultural literacy between experimental and control groups will be adopted to assess the practical effects of the proposed system.
文章引用:王雪, 康学哲. 课程思政视域下高校跨文化交际能力培养的理论耦合、现实困境与体系建构[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(8): 444-451. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.158677

参考文献

[1] 彭小飞, 张文忠. 高校外语课程思政教学设计的“6e”模型构建——以“综合商务英语”课程为例[J]. 豫章师范学院学报, 2026, 41(2): 79-85.
[2] 翟曼. 浅析产出导向法在大学英语写作中的育人教育[J]. 吉林工商学院学报, 2020, 36(6): 120-122.
[3] 付艳. 大学英语课程思政建设及对策研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024.
[4] 潘筱. 课程思政视域下大学英语教学中学生跨文化交际能力培养研究[J]. 教育信息化论坛, 2025(12): 154-156.
[5] 陈婉颖. 文化自信视野下对高校英语课程思政教学路径的再审视[J]. 长春大学学报, 2025, 35(12): 88-91.
[6] 郭学鹏. 数智时代民办高校文化育人的功能逻辑探析[J]. 陕西教育(高教), 2026(5): 22-24.
[7] 陈慧妍. 跨文化交际课程考核评价体系的构建[J]. 嘉应文学, 2026(5): 199-201.
[8] 王莉. 新时代高职院校辅导员思政工作路径探析——基于“三全育人”理念的思考[J]. 和田师范专科学校学报, 2020, 39(4): 25-28.
[9] 王力娟. 一流高校育人路径与策略研究——基于中外比较的视角[J]. 教学学术, 2025, 8(2): 116-136.
[10] 李斯涵. 红色文化融入大思政育人体系的“知行合一”研究[J]. 南叶, 2025(6): 143-144.
[11] 于金明, 白洁. 民族院校“跨文化-思辨-思政”一体化英语教学模式建构[J]. 甘肃高师学报, 2024, 29(1): 99-104.
[12] 朱灵. 跨文化交际课程思政建设评价体系构建[J]. 品位∙经典, 2023(5): 86-88.
[13] 祝钰. “跨文化交际”课程线上线下混合式教学实践研究[J]. 湖北第二师范学院学报, 2024, 41(1): 100-103.