等同侵权中可预见性规则的适用研究
A Study on the Application of the Foreseeability Rule in Equitable Infringement
摘要: 对可预见性规则尚存的缺陷进行剖析,选取可预见性规则的要件逻辑存在瑕疵、可预见性规则增加专利撰写负担、可预见性规则与捐献原则存在竞合三个问题展开剖析,并从明确可预见性规则的要件内涵、明晰权利要求书撰写的边界、把握可预见性规则与捐献原则之间的关系三个方面进行分析,以期完善可预见性规则的司法适用。
Abstract: This paper analyzes the existing flaws in the foreseeable rule, focusing on three issues: the flawed logic of its essential elements, the increased burden it imposes on patent drafting, and its potential conflict with the doctrine of surrender. It further examines these aspects from three perspectives—clarifying the connotation of the foreseeable rule’s essential elements, defining the boundaries of claim drafting, and understanding the relationship between the foreseeable rule and the doctrine of surrender—to propose improvements in the judicial application of the foreseeable rule.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
关于审理专利侵权纠纷案件若干问题的规定(会议讨论稿2003.10.27-29) [EB/OL]. https://www.cpahkltd.com/index.php?c=show&id=100510, 2010-03-27.
|
|
[2]
|
北京市高级人民法院《专利侵权判定指南(2017)》[EB/OL]. https://bjgy.bjcourt.gov.cn/article/detail/2017/04/id/2820737.shtml, 2017-04-20.
|
|
[3]
|
董慧凝, 郑璐璐. 专利侵权中可预见规则的法律适用[J]. 北方工业大学学报, 2019, 31(6): 113-120.
|
|
[4]
|
马云鹏. 等同侵权判定中可预见性规则的理解与适用[J]. 中国应用法学, 2023(5): 178-189.
|
|
[5]
|
Merges, R.P. and Duffy, J.F. (2017) Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials. 7th Edition, Carolina Academic Press, 1017.
|
|
[6]
|
马云鹏. 司法视野下权利要求解释的属性及必要性分析[J]. 法律适用, 2022(6): 66-75.
|
|
[7]
|
黄丽君. 等同原则的限制性规则——权利要求妨害原则[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(1): 162-170.
|
|
[8]
|
刘紫微. 专利禁止反悔原则适用范围的再思考[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2023, 26(4): 178-192.
|
|
[9]
|
李雨峰. 论专利公开与排他利益的动态平衡[J]. 知识产权, 2019(9): 3-10.
|
|
[10]
|
陈聪. 专利法上捐献原则的适用[J]. 人民司法, 2023(1): 102-106.
|
|
[11]
|
曹新明. 专利侵权等同原则适用研究[J]. 知识产权, 2023(2): 24-40.
|