积极老龄化视野下我国老年人社会参与的困境与调整路径
Dilemmas and Adjustment Paths of Social Participation of the Elderly in China from the Perspective of Active Aging
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.138553, PDF,   
作者: 周馨怡：贵州大学哲学学院，贵州 贵阳
关键词: 积极老龄化；老年人；社会参与；Active Aging； The Elderly； Social Participation
摘要: 随着人口老龄化进程加速，积极应对人口老龄化已上升为国家战略，老年人社会参与是激活老年人力资源、提升生活质量的关键。本研究立足积极老龄化视野，整合角色冲突、社会资本与活动理论构建分析框架，结合CHARLS全国调查数据剖析了我国老年人社会参与的现实特征。研究发现，当前老年人社会参与整体水平偏低，呈现休闲化倾向与显著的城乡、年龄、教育分化，面临参与动机被动化、载体单一化、领域局限化、经济与社区参与不足等困境。针对上述问题，从制度保障、载体建设、氛围培育、差异化参与四个维度提出了调整路径，为积极老龄化战略落地提供实践参考。
Abstract: As population aging accelerates, actively responding to aging has become a national strategy, with elderly social participation being key to activating human resources and improving quality of life. Based on the active aging perspective, this study integrates role conflict, social capital and activity theories to construct an analytical framework, and examines the characteristics of elderly social participation in China using CHARLS data. Findings reveal low overall participation, featuring leisure-oriented patterns and significant urban-rural, age and educational disparities, alongside dilemmas of passive motivation, limited carriers, restricted domains, and insufficient economic and community participation. Accordingly, adjustment paths are proposed from four dimensions: institutional guarantee, carrier construction, atmosphere cultivation and differentiated participation, providing practical references for the active aging strategy.
文章引用：周馨怡. 积极老龄化视野下我国老年人社会参与的困境与调整路径[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 258-265. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138553

参考文献

[1] 第七次全国人口普查公报[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/guoqing/2021-05/13/content_5606149.htm, 2026-04-25.
[2] 陈卫. 中国人口负增长与老龄化趋势预测[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(5): 133-144.
[3] 郝福庆, 王谈凌, 鲍文涵, 积极应对人口老龄化的战略思考和政策取向[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2019(2): 43-47+61.
[4] 童玉芬. 中国人口的最新动态与趋势——结合第七次全国人口普查数据的分析[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2021, 35(4): 15-25.
[5] 中共中央 国务院印发《国家积极应对人口老龄化中长期规划》[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/21/content_5454347.htm, 2026-04-25.
[6] 冯艳. 老年健康行为特征､演变及其健康效应[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2018.
[7] 杨茜. 中国老年人口健康和社会参与的相关关系研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2020.
[8] Denton, F.T. and Spencer, B.G. (2002) Some Demographic Consequences of Revising the Definition of “Old Age” to Reflect Future Changes in Life Table Probabilities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 21, 349-356.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980800001677
[9] 翟振武, 李龙. 老年标准和定义的再探讨[J]. 人口研究, 2014, 38(6): 57-63.
[10] 朱玉山. 美国公立大学治理中的社会参与研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2017.
[11] 周云, 常亮亮. 老年人“社会参与”的概念界定及其研究视角[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2020, 8(6): 38-49.
[12] Gergen, M.M. and Gergen, K.J. (2001) Positive Aging: New Images for a New Age. Ageing International, 27, 3-23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-001-1013-6
[13] Havighurst, R.J. (1961) Successful Aging. The Gerontologist, 1, 8-13.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/1.1.8
[14] Rowe, J.W. and Kahn, R.L. (1987) Human Aging: Usual and Successful. Science, 237, 143-149.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3299702
[15] Butler, R.N. and Gleason, H.P. (1985) Productive Aging: Enhancing Vitality in Later Life. Springer Publishing, 148.
[16] Lemon, B.W., Bengtson, V.L. and Peterson, J.A. (1972) An Exploration of the Activity Theory of Aging: Activity Types and Life Satisfaction among In-Movers to a Retirement Community. Journal of Gerontology, 27, 511-523.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/27.4.511
[17] Eyssen, I.C., Steultjens, M.P., Dekker, J. and Terwee, C.B. (2011) A Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Participation: Challenges in Defining Participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 983-997.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006
[18] 刘玺. 社会参与对老年人群生命质量的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2023.

为你推荐