产教融合视域下MPAcc多元主体协同育人机制构建研究——基于10所高校培养方案的经验总结与启示
Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Cultivation Mechanism for MPAcc in the Context of Industry-Education Integration—Experiences and Implications from 10 University Curriculum Plans
摘要: 产教融合是MPAcc教育解决人才供需方面结构性矛盾的关键路径。本研究选取十所高校的MPAcc培养方案,使用相关理论,构建起“主体协同,过程嵌入,评价反馈”三维分析框架,系统地梳理各个院校在培养目标,课程体系,实践教学还有协同育人等方面所采取的做法以及所积累的经验。研究发现,各高校在国家标准的框架内形成“共性为基、特色为翼”培养目标。在课程层面搭建核心必修和前沿选修相融合的结构化体系;在实践层面探寻模块分解,过程管理,成果导向的精细化模式;在协同层面打造双导师制,共建课程,学科竞赛等多维互动的机制。本文通过总结各个院校的实践方面的经验,为MPAcc培养方案的优化提供可供参考的路径。
Abstract: Industry-education integration serves as a critical pathway for MPAcc education to resolve the structural supply-demand mismatch of talents. This study selects MPAcc curriculum plans from ten universities and, drawing on relevant theories, constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of “stakeholder collaboration, process integration, and evaluation feedback” to systematically examine the initiatives and experiences of these institutions in terms of cultivation objectives, curriculum systems, practical teaching, and collaborative talent cultivation. The findings reveal that: in cultivation objectives, the ten universities form a pattern of “commonality as the foundation, characteristics as the supplement” under the national standard framework; in curriculum, they build a structured system integrating core compulsory courses with cutting-edge electives; in practice, they explore a refined model featuring modular decomposition, process management, and outcome orientation; in collaboration, they develop multi-dimensional interactive mechanisms such as dual-supervisor system, co-developed courses, and academic competitions. By synthesizing the practical experiences of these universities, this paper provides referential pathways for the optimization of MPAcc curriculum plans.
文章引用:李文韬, 华宇虹. 产教融合视域下MPAcc多元主体协同育人机制构建研究——基于10所高校培养方案的经验总结与启示[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 848-855. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681701

参考文献

[1] 史春玲. 数字经济时代会计人才供需匹配探究[J]. 财会月刊, 2025, 46(3): 67-73.
[2] Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
[3] Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (2020) 2020 Guiding Principles and Standards for Business Accreditation.
[4] 洪峰, 于国旺. 基于实践调查的会计专硕校企协同培养机制优化研究[J]. 中国农业会计, 2024, 34(13): 103-105.
[5] 刘迅, 向同. “数智化 + 会计教育”交融视域下MPAcc实践应用能力提升路径研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 21(8): 138-142.
[6] 王青松, 李欣澳, 吴蓓. 协同治理视角下“五位一体”MPAcc培养质量保障体系的构建[J]. 商业会计, 2024(12): 107-110.
[7] Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
[8] DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
[9] 周向红, 谭茂, 周志强, 吴建军. 人工智能背景下会计硕士培养困境与优化路径研究[J]. 当代教育理论与实践, 2026, 18(2): 130-136.
[10] 张倩, 曹传浩, 张嘉桐. 产教融合协同育人视角下MPAcc素质链新质人才培养研究[J]. 中国高校科技, 2025(9): 84-90.