“双减”背景下初中道德与法治课教学评价的变革成效、现实困境与优化对策
Teaching Evaluation for Junior High School Morality and the Rule of Law under the “Double Reduction” Policy: Changes, Effects, Dilemmas and Optimization Strategies
摘要: “双减”政策与教育评价改革共同推动基础教育转向素养育人,初中道德与法治学科评价随之迎来调整。当前学科评价虽在课堂随堂考核、实践作业评定、多主体评价试点等方面产生变化,但长期应试思维形成的评价惯性并未彻底消除,普遍存在评价导向功利化、评价形式无法覆盖教学全流程、评价参与主体单一、实践作业配套评价机制缺失的问题。针对上述现实矛盾,学科评价优化可从四重维度推进落地:更新素养优先的评价价值导向,构建覆盖课前、课中、课后的全过程评价模式,搭建教师、学生、家长、社区联动的多元协同评价体系,细化分层作业评价标准与闭环反馈流程。四管齐下能够有效缓解过度依赖分数评价的问题,同步实现“双减”减负与学科育人双重目标。
Abstract: The “Double Reduction” policy and the education evaluation reform have jointly driven basic education toward competency-based cultivation, prompting corresponding adjustments in the evaluation of junior high school Morality and Rule of Law. Current subject evaluations have seen changes in areas such as in-class formative assessments, practical assignment evaluations, and trials of multi-stakeholder participation. However, the ingrained evaluation inertia shaped by long-standing exam-oriented mindsets has not been thoroughly eliminated. Common problems persist, including utilitarian evaluation orientation, evaluation formats that fail to cover the entire teaching process, a single evaluation participant structure, and the absence of supporting evaluation mechanisms for practical assignments. To address these practical contradictions, the optimization of subject evaluation can be advanced along four dimensions: updating the value orientation of evaluation toward competency priority, constructing a whole-process evaluation model covering pre-class, in-class, and post-class stages, establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative evaluation system involving teachers, students, parents, and the community, and refining tiered assignment evaluation criteria with closed-loop feedback mechanisms. These four measures, when implemented together, can effectively alleviate over-reliance on score-based assessment while simultaneously achieving the dual goals of workload reduction and subject-based education under the “Double Reduction” policy.
文章引用:陶际云, 陶有浩. “双减”背景下初中道德与法治课教学评价的变革成效、现实困境与优化对策[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 856-864. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681702

参考文献

[1] 中共中央 国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL]. 2020-10-13.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm, 2026-06-06.
[2] 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》[EB/OL]. 2021-07-24,
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202203/content_3635502.htm, 2026-06-06.
[3] 刘长海, 马超. 科学开展道德与法治课程考试是德育生态优化的重要机制[J]. 中小学德育, 2022(6): 30-33.
[4] 屈传琦. 论道德与法治课堂教学评价即时反馈[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2022(15): 71-73.
[5] 郑乐安. “双减”背景下创新作业设计[J]. 思想政治课教学, 2022(4): 37-41.
[6] 刘宝锋. 初中道德与法治教学困境突围——以“教-学-评”一致性为视角[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2025(3): 60-62.
[7] 余智敏, 向诗清. 初中道德与法治课堂教学多元化评价探论[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2025(47): 48-50.
[8] 周冰, 唐彦章. 基于CIPP模式的初中道德与法治课教学评价体系构建[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2024, 40(12): 90-95.
[9] 饶黎. 教学评一体化: 实现有效教学的途径[J]. 林区教学, 2022(9): 80-83.
[10] 徐洁, 尹鑫, 陈含笑. 智能时代中小学德育评价变革探析[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2022(4): 106-112.
[11] 阙祥兴. “双减”背景下初中道德与法治课堂教学的优化路径[J]. 亚太教育, 2023(12): 124-126.
[12] 雒成茜. “双减”背景下初中道德与法治课教学评价改革路径分析[J]. 中国科技经济新闻数据库 教育, 2025(6): 33-36.