数智化学习支架促进古诗词哲理理解的教学路径研究——以《春江花月夜》为例
Pedagogical Path of Digital-Intelligent Scaffolds for Philosophical Understanding in Classical Poetry—A Case Study of Spring River and Moonlit Night
摘要: 《普通高中语文课程标准(2017年版2020年修订)》凝练了四方面学科核心素养,对古诗词教学的思维深度与审美高度提出了更高要求。当前古诗词哲理教学中在一定程度上存在“景与理的割裂”“体验的匮乏”“思维的浅表化”三重困境,学生从“读景”到“读理”的思维跃升缺乏有效的认知阶梯。针对上述有待优化的教学环节,本文以建构主义学习支架理论和最近发展区理论为依据,结合数智化学习环境,构建“情境支架–问题支架–对比支架”三维教学模式,并以《春江花月夜》为例进行教学设计与分析。
Abstract: The High School Chinese Curriculum Standards set higher demands on both thinking depth and aesthetic quality in poetry teaching. Current instruction tends to face three common problems, namely the separation of imagery from philosophy, insufficient experiential learning, and shallow thinking. As a result, students lack adequate cognitive support to move from reading “scenes” to grasping “philosophy.” Drawing on scaffolding theory and the zone of proximal development, this paper proposes a three-dimensional model incorporating digital-intelligent environments, which consists of situational scaffolds, question scaffolds, and comparative scaffolds. The application of this model is illustrated through a teaching design based on Spring River and Moonlit Night.
文章引用:王郧真, 马永军. 数智化学习支架促进古诗词哲理理解的教学路径研究——以《春江花月夜》为例[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 865-871. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681703

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中语文课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022: 17.
[2] 江晓慧. “任务驱动-支架式”教学模式在高中古诗词教学中的应用[N]. 贵州教育报, 2025(A09).
[3] 何克抗. 建构主义——革新传统教学的理论基础(上) [J]. 电化教育研究, 1997(3): 3-9.
[4] 维果茨基. 思维与语言[M]. 李维, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010: 86-88.
[5] 单俊豪, 洪越洋, 郭付民强, 等. 人机协同教育场景中的智能化学习支架: 内涵、设计方略与发展路向[J]. 中国电化教育, 2025(5): 95-101.
[6] 布鲁姆. 教育目标分类学·第一分册: 知识领域[M]. 罗黎辉, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1986: 19.
[7] 倪文锦. 语文核心素养视野中的群文阅读[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2017, 37(6): 44-48.