基于Grant教材评价理念的初中英语教材生活化情境设计研究
A Study on the Life-Based Context Design of Junior High School English Textbooks Based on Grant’s Textbook Evaluation Philosophy
摘要: 初中英语教材生活化情境设计的好坏,会直接影响学生语言应用能力以及综合语言能力发展。研究系统梳理Grant教材评价理念的核心内涵,以其提出的目标导向性、学习者适配性、教学适配性评价理念为依据,以人教版、外研版、沪教版三套国内使用广泛的初中英语教材为研究对象,采用文献研究法、内容分析法、案例研究法,探究教材生活化情境设计现状、问题、优化途径。研究表明,目前教材的情境设计存在着贴合度不够、文化融合不足、能力指向不明的现象;根据Grant理念创建的“三维六指标”评价体系可以较好地对设计品质做出评判。研究结论可以给教材编写、修订以及教学实践提供理论依据和实践参考。
Abstract: The quality of life-oriented context design in junior high school English textbooks exerts a direct impact on students’ language application competence and comprehensive language development. Grounded in Grant’s textbook evaluation philosophy—namely goal orientation, learner adaptability and teaching adaptability—this study takes three widely-used junior high school English textbook series (PEP edition, FLTRP edition, and Shanghai Education edition) as research objects. Adopting literature review, content analysis and case study methods, this paper explores the current status, existing problems and optimization paths of life-oriented context design in textbooks. The findings reveal that current textbook context design generally suffers from insufficient relevance to real life, superficial cultural integration, and vague competence orientation. The “three-dimension, six-indicator” evaluation system derived from Grant’s philosophy can effectively assess the quality of context design. The conclusions can provide theoretical basis and practical references for textbook compilation, revision and teaching practice.
文章引用:钱圣如, 项思盈, Almukhamedova Arina, 李彬. 基于Grant教材评价理念的初中英语教材生活化情境设计研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(8): 496-502. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.158683

参考文献

[1] Aldeaij, G. (2023) An Evaluative Study of “We Can1” English Textbook in Saudi Public Elementary Schools. English Language Teaching, 16, 59-72.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n10p59
[2] Alsan, G. and Eminoglu Kucuktepe, S. (2023) The Evaluation of the Sixth-Grade English Coursebook According to the Views of Teachers. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 20, 159-169.
https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2023.51
[3] 胡唯哲. 国外英语作为二语教材评价量表编制与启示[J]. 外语界, 2024(4): 42-48.
[4] 杨敏, 王晶. 基于合法化语码理论视角的法律英语教材评价框架研究[J]. 中国外语, 2024, 21(3): 77-86.
[5] 汪祖玥. 跨文化交际能力培养目标下的沪教版初中英语教材评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林外国语大学, 2023.
[6] 姜岩. 沪教版初中英语教科书阅读文本评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学, 2021.
[7] 王丽媛. 人教版和外研版初中英语教材阅读材料对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 伊宁: 伊犁师范大学, 2021.
[8] 顾笑. 国内外英语教材评价研究述评[J]. 齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报, 2022(5): 146-149.
[9] 裴莹莹. 基于言语行为理论的人教版初中英语教材评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 锦州: 渤海大学, 2022.
[10] 安宸. 新课标视角下鲁教版初中英语六年级教材的评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济宁: 曲阜师范大学, 2021.
[11] 邓昊熙. 英语写作课堂上思辨能力培养的教学实践探索——从教材评价、任务设计和习作评价说起[J]. 英语广场, 2020(36): 101-104.
[12] 单意茗. 英语阅读教材评价体系探析[J]. 海外英语, 2020(21): 3-4.