基层自治活力激发的运行机制与实践路径研究——以东台市“五治融合”模式为例

Research on the Operating Mechanism and Practical Path of Stimulating Vitality in Grassroots Self-Governance—Taking the “Five-Governance Integration” Model of Dongtai City as an Example

摘要: 基层自治活力是提高基层治理效能和推进基层治理现代化的重要基础。面对新形势下，基层社会结构日益复杂多元、群众治理需求不断增加等新问题，如何有效激发基层自治活力成为基层治理实践中亟待回答的重大课题。文章以江苏省东台市“五治融合”治理实践作为研究对象，在群众参与理论和协同治理理论视角下，围绕“治理载体–运行机制–自治活力”这一分析框架展开研究。首先，该市通过邻馨桥“五单工作法”、小院议事会、“云小二”数字平台等方式，建立起覆盖诉求表达、协商议事、数字参与的完善多元治理体系，并逐步建立起组织整合、诉求响应、协商参与和数字赋能四重运行机制。其中，组织整合夯实基层自治根基；诉求响应培育参与动力；协商参与丰富主体意识；数字赋能拓宽参与空间。多重机制共同作用使得东台市基层自治活力不断释放。但是，基层自治活力继续生成仍然面临着参与主体不均衡、协商成果转化差、数字参与存在技术鸿沟和资源保障压力较大等方面限制。未来应当更好地健全多元参与体系、完善协商成果转化机制、优化数字治理体系以及强化资源保障能力等，实现基层自治活力由阶段性激发向常态化生成的转变。

Abstract: Grassroots self-governance vitality constitutes an important foundation for improving the effectiveness of grassroots governance and advancing its modernization. In the face of emerging challenges, including increasingly complex and diverse grassroots social structures and growing public demand for participation in governance, how to effectively stimulate grassroots self-governance vitality has become a major issue urgently requiring resolution in grassroots governance practice. This study examines the “Five-Governance Integration” model implemented in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province. Drawing on theories of public participation and collaborative governance, it adopts an analytical framework of “governance platforms - operational mechanisms - self-governance vitality.” First, Dongtai has developed a comprehensive and diversified governance system encompassing channels for expressing demands, deliberative consultation, and digital participation through initiatives such as the “Lin Xin Qiao” Five-List Working Method, courtyard deliberation meetings, and the “Yun Xiao Er” digital platform. It has also gradually established four operational mechanisms: organizational integration, responsiveness to public demands, consultative participation, and digital empowerment. Organizational integration consolidates the foundations of grassroots self-governance; responsiveness to public demands cultivates motivation for participation; consultative participation strengthens awareness among governance actors; and digital empowerment broadens the space for participation. Through the combined effects of these mechanisms, grassroots self-governance vitality in Dongtai has been continuously unleashed. Nevertheless, its sustained development remains constrained by imbalances among participating actors, ineffective translation of consultative outcomes, technological divides in digital participation, and considerable pressure on resource provision. Going forward, it is necessary to further improve the system for diverse participation, strengthen mechanisms for translating consultative outcomes into practice, optimize the digital governance system, and enhance resource-support capacity, thereby transforming grassroots self-governance vitality from episodic activation to sustained and normalized development.