基于AHP-模糊综合评价的工程训练能力评价研究
Research on Engineering Training Competency Evaluation Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.158346, PDF,   
作者: 苟美玲, 常格格, 张雪莹, 郭 樾, 魏 强*:江汉大学教育学院,湖北 武汉;屈斌文:江汉大学资产与实验室管理处,湖北 武汉
关键词: 工程训练层次分析法模糊综合评价能力评价Engineering Training Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Competency Evaluation
摘要: 以高校工程训练教学过程为研究场景,运用层次分析法(AHP)–模糊综合评价法对工程训练效果进行系统评价,旨在精准识别影响工程训练质量的关键因素,为优化训练教学方案、提升学生工程实践能力提供理论支撑与实践指导。首先基于AHP构建工程训练效果评价体系,结合专家评审与实训教师经验,通过两两比较构建判断矩阵、经一致性检验后为各层级指标分配权重;随后通过发放教师问卷收集评价数据,确定各指标隶属函数并建立模糊综合评价矩阵;最后以某高校机械类专业3个班级的工程训练教学实践为研究对象开展实证分析。研究结果表明,AHP-模糊综合评价方法可有效量化工程训练效果,其中知识掌握水平、实践操作能力是影响训练效果的核心因素,该研究构建的评价体系与分析框架可为工程训练教学质量提升提供科学依据。
Abstract: Taking the engineering training teaching process in colleges and universities as the research context, this study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method to systematically assess the effectiveness of engineering training. The aim is to precisely identify the key factors affecting the quality of engineering training, thereby providing theoretical support and practical guidance for optimizing training teaching plans and enhancing students’ engineering practice abilities. First, an evaluation system for engineering training effectiveness is constructed based on AHP. Combined with expert reviews and the experience of training instructors, judgment matrices are established through pairwise comparisons, and weights are assigned to indicators at each level after consistency testing. Subsequently, evaluation data are collected through questionnaires distributed to teachers, membership functions of each indicator are determined, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation matrix is constructed. Finally, an empirical analysis is conducted with the engineering training teaching practice of three classes majoring in mechanical engineering at a certain university as the research object. The results show that the AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method can effectively quantify the effectiveness of engineering training, among which the level of knowledge mastery and practical operation ability are the core factors affecting training effectiveness. The evaluation system and analytical framework constructed in this study can provide a scientific basis for improving the teaching quality of engineering training.
文章引用:苟美玲, 常格格, 张雪莹, 郭樾, 屈斌文, 魏强. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价的工程训练能力评价研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(8): 329-340. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.158346

参考文献

[1] 刘利刚, 王雪姣, 李朋, 等. 工程训练实践教学提升大学生非技术能力路径探索——以燕山大学工程训练中心为例[J]. 科技风, 2025(36): 16-19.
[2] 余继. 走向工业强国: 工程实践教育的创新与优化——基于5所高校工程训练中心的考察[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2025, 46(2): 129-135.
[3] 吴岩. 新工科: 高等工程教育的未来[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(6): 1-5.
[4] Nickerson, J.V., Corter, J.E., Esche, S.K. and Chassapis, C. (2007) A Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Engineering Laboratories and Simulations in Education. Computers & Education, 49, 708-725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.019
[5] ElZomor, M., Mann, C., Doten-Snitker, K., Parrish, K. and Chester, M. (2018) Leveraging Vertically Integrated Courses and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Students’ Performance and Skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144, Article 04018009.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000379
[6] Chan, A., Sher, W. and Breen, J. (2012) Teamwork Development across the Curriculum for Chemical Engineering Students. Education for Chemical Engineers, 7, e85-e91.
[7] Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C. and Paris, A.H. (2004) School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
[8] 周世权, 朱旗, 李华飞, 等. 工程训练课程教学质量评价体系的研究[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2014, 33(7): 152-156.
[9] 张艳蕊, 冯慧娟, 刘晓微, 等. 跨学科工程实践课程教学模式探索与实践[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2024, 43(11): 209-212.
[10] 曾祥鹤, 任海东. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价的服装直播中消费者购买决策影响因素分析[J]. 毛纺科技, 2025, 53(5): 95-101.
[11] 李静, 祖江颖, 王依晨, 等. 基于AHP和模糊综合评价方法的儿童早教机设计[J]. 包装工程, 2021, 42(2): 118-122, 142.
[12] 倪建国. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价的市政工程项目施工质量控制研究[J]. 价值工程, 2025, 44(36): 50-52.
[13] 张金海, 吕庆功, 高琴, 等. 新工科背景下融合AI的工程训练教学体系探索[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2025, 41(5): 213-219.
[14] 宋佳秋, 侯培国, 王雪姣, 等. 虚实结合的智能制造工程训练实践教学改革[J]. 智能制造, 2026(2): 193-198.
[15] 付学刚. 大学生工程训练教学中创新能力培养分析[J]. 现代职业教育, 2016(18): 29.
[16] 丁连涛, 吴彤, 刘思含, 等. 新工科背景下提高教学类仪器设备利用率的探索与实践——以吉林大学工程训练中心为例[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2024, 41(8): 244-250.