从分工到耦合:高校家校协同的路径重构与自我主导力培育
From Division to Coupling: Reconstructing the Path of University-Home Collaboration for Fostering Self-Authorship
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1681755, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 解启健, 吴宁宁*, 江茂欣:西交利物浦大学学生事务办公室,江苏 苏州
关键词: 自我主导力家校协同共识性质性研究耦合路径Self-Authorship Home-School Collaboration Consensual Qualitative Research Coupling Pathway
摘要: 高校家校协同长期面临“责任模糊、协同低效、与学生发展需求脱节”的困境。本研究以自我主导力理论为敏化概念,运用共识性质性研究方法,对10例涵盖学业危机、心理困境与高风险行为的学生案例进行深度分析。研究发现,困境的本质在于学生自我主导力发展受阻;有效的家校协同遵循“评估–边界–激活”三阶段动态耦合路径:评估阶段以自我主导力为核心进行系统诊断;边界阶段针对“侵入型”或“缺位型”家庭边界,采取“赋权式”或“结构化”调和策略,协商建立动态的“支持性责任框架”;激活阶段通过“创造负责任的选择”和“促进反思性对话”,促成学生主体性回归。该模型推动家校协同实现从行为纠偏到发展赋能、从静态分工到动态耦合、从家校二元到学生–家校三元共生的范式转向,为构建以学生内在成长为导向的协同育人体系提供了理论依据与实践指南。
Abstract: Home-School collaboration in higher education has long been plagued by ambiguous responsibilities, inefficient coordination, and misalignment with students’ developmental needs. Grounded in the theory of self-authorship as a sensitizing concept, this study employed a consensual qualitative research (CQR) approach to analyze ten student cases involving academic crises, psychological distress, and high-risk behaviors. The findings reveal that the core of these challenges lies in students’ arrested development of self-authorship. Effective collaboration follows a dynamic three-stage coupling pathway of “assessment-boundary-activation.” The assessment stage involves systematic diagnosis centered on students’ self-authorship. The boundary stage addresses either “intrusive” or “absent” family boundaries through “empowerment-oriented” or “structural adjustment” strategies, negotiating a dynamic “supportive responsibility framework.” The activation stage facilitates the return of student agency through “creating accountable choices” and “promoting reflective dialogue.” This pathway model advances a paradigm shift in home-school collaboration—from behavior correction to developmental empowerment, from static division of labor to dynamic coupling, and from a home-school binary to a student-home-school trinity—offering both theoretical grounding and practical guidance for building a collaborative education system oriented toward students’ inner growth.
文章引用:解启健, 吴宁宁, 江茂欣. 从分工到耦合:高校家校协同的路径重构与自我主导力培育[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 1272-1281. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681755

参考文献

[1] Epstein, J.L. (2018) School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. 2nd Edition, Routledge.
[2] 叶茂源, 魏论研. 家校协同育人的探索与思考[J]. 高校辅导员, 2025(90): 58-61.
[3] Ewart, S.M. (2022) Beyond Helicopter Parenting: Rethinking Family Engagement in Higher Education. Review of Higher Education, 45, 325-350.
[4] Wartman, K.L. and Savage, M. (2008) Parental Involvement in Higher Education: Understanding the Relationship Among Students, Parents, and the Institution. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33, 1-125.
[5] Schiffrin, H.H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K.A., Erchull, M.J. and Tashner, T. (2014) Helping or Hovering? The Effects of Helicopter Parenting on College Students’ Well-Being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 548-557.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3
[6] 张勇. 从“分工”到“协同”: 高校家校合作的范式转型[J]. 中国高等教育, 2022(12): 45-48.
[7] 吴重涵, 张俊, 王梅雾. 西方家校合作研究的新领域: 从角色分工到共同责任[J]. 教育研究, 2012, 33(12): 142-147.
[8] 孙晓红, 王琳, 李静. 高校辅导员在家校协同中的角色定位与实践路径[J]. 思想教育研究, 2023(5): 112-116.
[9] Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2001) Making Their Own Way: Narratives for Transforming Higher Education to Promote Self-Development. Stylus Publishing.
[10] Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2008) Three Elements of Self-Authorship. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 269-284.
https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0016
[11] Baxter Magolda, M.B. and King, P.M. (2004) Learning Partnerships: Theory and Models of Practice to Educate for Self-Authorship. Stylus Publishing.
[12] Minuchin, S. (1974) Families and Family Therapy. Harvard University Press.
[13] Lerner, R.M. (2002) Concepts and Theories of Human Development. 3rd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14] 解启健. 学业困难学生自我主导力与压力应对关系的研究——以西交利物浦大学为例[J]. 江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 43(4): 147-154.
[15] 于晨, 吴红斌, 吴美辰. 八年制医学博士的“弃医”选择——基于自我主导力理论的研究[J]. 中国高教研究, 2020(1): 71-77.
[16] 熊慧, 杨钋. 自我主导力视角下导生互动影响硕士生个体发展质量的实证研究[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2023(4): 59-70.
[17] Blumer, H. (1954) What Is Wrong with Social Theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
[18] 刘志迎, 张悦, 陈洁. 管理案例研究的逻辑与方法[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(3): 330-338.
[19] Hill, C.E., Knox, S., Thompson, B.J., Williams, E.N., Hess, S.A. and Ladany, N. (2005) Consensual Qualitative Research: An Update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196-205.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
[20] Winnicott, D.W. (1960) The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 585-595.
[21] Cohen, S. and Wills, T.A. (1985) Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
[22] Clark, S.C. (2000) Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance. Human Relations, 53, 747-770.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
[23] Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000) Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
[24] Ashforth, B.E., Kreiner, G.E. and Fugate, M. (2000) All in a Day’s Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
https://doi.org/10.2307/259305