顺应与建构:ChatGPT的话语调适与人机关系的协同演化
Between Adaptation and Co-Construction: ChatGPT’s Discursive Alignment and the Evolving Human-Machine Relationship
摘要: 大型语言模型ChatGPT在实际交互中表现出显著的输出调适现象。本研究深入考察了ChatGPT的话语调适策略及用户在此情境下的技术实践。研究发现,ChatGPT主要采用基于事实的调适与基于情感的调适两种策略来响应用户。用户往往出于情感需求等原因主动接纳并利用ChatGPT的调适特性,通过提示词对其进行引导,并在交往过程中产生反向学习效应,由此形成一种相互建构、互为参照的人机关系。话语调适机制削弱了人机交流中异质他者的在场感,使交互更多呈现为自我投射的回响而非真正的共鸣,交往的服务化取向推动人机关系走向可计算、可预测的标准化模式。在此背景下,人保持主体性需要在技术使用中保持反思性距离,并回归真实的人际交往与生活经验以寻求实质性共鸣。
Abstract: Large language model ChatGPT exhibits significant output adaptation phenomena in actual interactions. This study conducts an in-depth investigation into ChatGPT’s discourse adaptation strategies and users’ technological practices in this context. The findings reveal that ChatGPT primarily employs two adaptation strategies—fact-based adaptation and emotion-based adaptation—to respond to users. Users, often driven by emotional needs, actively embrace and leverage ChatGPT’s adaptive features, guiding it through prompts and generating a reverse learning effect in the process of interaction. This gives rise to a mutually constructive, mutually referential human-machine relationship. The discourse adaptation mechanism weakens the presence of the heterogeneous other in human-machine communication, rendering the interaction more as an echo of self-projection than genuine resonance. The service-oriented orientation of interaction propels human-machine relations toward a calculable, predictable, and standardized mode. In this context, maintaining human agency requires sustaining a reflexive distance in technology use and returning to authentic interpersonal communication and lived experience to seek substantive resonance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., et al. (2023) Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548
|
|
[2]
|
Cotra, A. (2021) Why AI Alignment Could Be Hard with Modern Deep Learning. Cold Takes. https://www.cold-takes.com/why-ai-alignment-could-be-hard-with-modern-deep-learning/
|
|
[3]
|
Guo, L. (2024) Unmasking the Shadows of AI: Investigating Deceptive Capabilities in Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09676
|
|
[4]
|
王颖吉, 王袁欣. 任务或闲聊?——人机交流的极限与聊天机器人的发展路径选择[J]. 国际新闻界, 2021, 43(4): 30-50.
|
|
[5]
|
张洪忠, 张尔坤, 狄心悦, 等. 准社会交往视角下ChatGPT人机关系建构与应对思考[J]. 社会治理, 2023(1): 20-29.
|
|
[6]
|
彭兰. “镜子”与“他者”: 智能机器与人类关系之考辨[J]. 新闻大学, 2024(3): 18-32+117-118.
|
|
[7]
|
https://www.cqvip.com/doc/journal/7113287686?sign=a71d1c9dfb32c13432a6811c73e980eeb133ad5aabacc3940faa0b029233a029&expireTime=1801299924196&resourceId=7113287686&type=1
|
|
[8]
|
王亮. 社交机器人“单向度情感”伦理风险问题刍议[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2020, 36(1): 56-61.
|
|
[9]
|
邓卫斌, 于国龙. 社交机器人发展现状及关键技术研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(12): 163-170.
|
|
[10]
|
雪莉·特克尔. 重拾交谈[M]. 王晋, 边若溪, 赵岭, 译. 北京: 中信出版集团, 2015: 367.
|
|
[11]
|
章洁, 方建移. 研究回顾: 作为传媒现象的准社会交往[J]. 新闻界, 2009(2): 19-21.
|
|
[12]
|
哈特穆特·罗萨. 新异化的诞生: 社会加速批判理论大纲[M]. 郑作彧, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2018: 140-141.
|
|
[13]
|
喻国明, 杨雅. 5G时代: 未来传播中“人-机”关系的模式重构[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2020(1): 5-10.
|
|
[14]
|
洪杰文, 陈嵘伟. 意识激发与规则想象: 用户抵抗算法的战术依归和实践路径[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2022, 29(8): 38-56+126-127.
|
|
[15]
|
韩炳哲. 爱欲之死[M]. 宋娀, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2017: 37.
|
|
[16]
|
Lin, B. (2024) The AI Chatbot Always Flirts with Me, Should I Flirt Back: From the McDonaldization of Friendship to the Robotization of Love. Social Media + Society, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241296229
|
|
[17]
|
王鑫. 基于“理解”的ChatGPT人机交流反思与主体性问题复归[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 162-171.
|