公路扩建扰动下山区滑坡稳定性评价与防治措施
Stability Evaluation and Prevention Measures of Mountain Landslides under Highway Widening Disturbance
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.158210, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 赵志永:广西华蓝岩土工程有限公司,广西 南宁;夏路路*, 周普红, 黄飞婷:广西自然资源职业技术学院,广西 崇左;杨源浩:百色学院土木建筑工程学院,广西 百色;桂林电子科技大学建筑与交通工程学院,广西 桂林
关键词: 公路扩建山区滑坡全风化砂质页岩稳定性评价锚索格构梁Highway Widening Mountain Landslide Fully Weathered Sandy Shale Stability Evaluation Anchor-Cable Lattice Beam
摘要: 山区公路扩建扰动常通过坡脚切坡削弱前缘支撑,叠加强降雨入渗易诱发残坡积土边坡复活滑动。以陆川县某一级公路段东侧山体为例,分析滑坡发育特征、形成机制、稳定性及治理措施。结果表明:研究区发育H1、H2、H3、H4四处滑坡及XP1隐患,滑体主要为第四系残坡积全风化砂质页岩,单体体积约4044.32~30789.6 m3,总规模约61713.25 m3。坡脚切坡形成临空面、强降雨入渗、软弱岩土遇水强度衰减及坡面长期裸露,是滑坡复活和扩展的主要原因。稳定性评价显示,暴雨工况下边坡稳定性明显降低,局部处于不稳定或欠稳定状态。治理宜采用削坡减载、锚索格构梁、截排水、复绿等综合措施;H2等剩余下滑力较大的滑坡,应结合抗滑桩桩板墙进行控制。研究成果可为类似工程防治措施提供参考。
Abstract: Highway widening in mountainous areas often weakens slope toe support through excavation disturbance. When coupled with intense rainfall infiltration, this process can easily induce reactivation and progressive failure of residual-soil slopes. Taking a landslide on the eastern mountain slope of a first-class highway section in Luchuan County as an example, this study analyzes its development characteristics, formation mechanism, stability condition, and mitigation measures. The results show that four landslides, namely H1, H2, H3, and H4, and one potential landslide area, XP1, have developed in the study area. The sliding mass is mainly composed of Quaternary residual fully weathered sandy shale, with individual volumes of approximately 4,044.32~30,789.6 m3 and a total volume of approximately 61,713.25 m3. The formation of a free face by slope toe excavation, intense rainfall infiltration, strength degradation of weak rock and soil after water exposure, and long-term exposure of the slope surface are the main causes of landslide reactivation and expansion. Stability evaluation indicates that the slope stability decreases significantly under rainstorm conditions, with some areas becoming unstable or marginally stable. Comprehensive mitigation measures, including slope cutting for unloading, anchor-cable lattice beams, drainage works, and revegetation, are recommended. For landslides with large residual sliding force, such as H2, anti-slide pile-slab walls should also be adopted. The findings may provide a reference for prevention and control measures in similar projects.
文章引用:赵志永, 夏路路, 周普红, 杨源浩, 黄飞婷. 公路扩建扰动下山区滑坡稳定性评价与防治措施[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(8): 143-151. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.158210

参考文献

[1] 岳中琦. 梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(4): 1-12.
[2] 郑家毓, 李帆, 何耀夫. 某高速公路边坡监测及稳定性模拟分析[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2024, 35(2): 36-41.
[3] 揭鸿鹄, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 等. 融合多源信息的降雨入渗边坡概率反分析及可靠度预测[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(1): 28-36.
[4] 霍善欣, 王新刚, 薛晨, 等. 熵权法改进的模糊数学滑坡稳定性评价方法研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(1): 19-27.
[5] 侯文腾, 王育奎, 杜相波, 等. 某营运高速公路类土质边坡的稳定性分析及加固设计[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2024, 38(1): 47-51.
[6] 席宏平, 李怀鑫, 晏长根, 等. 路堑边坡浅层塌滑的控制因素与生态防治措施——以双达公路边坡为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(3): 70-79.
[7] 魏东旭, 万利, 刘传利, 等. 卢家湾大桥堆积体滑坡稳定性分析及处治措施研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2023, 37(3): 291-296.
[8] 叶为民, 孔令伟, 胡瑞林, 等. 膨胀土滑坡与工程边坡新型防治技术与工程示范研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(7): 1295-1309.
[9] 谢振文, 巢万里, 刘文劼, 等. 基于空-地协同的公路边坡施工监测与策略调控探究[J]. 公路工程, 2022, 47(3): 97-103+142.
[10] 魏占玺, 谢东武, 毋远召, 等. 基于动态残余强度的不同含水率条件下滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(2): 126-136.
[11] 凌建明, 张玉, 满立, 等. 公路边坡智能化监测体系研究进展[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(7): 2118-2136.
[12] 邵珠山, 赵南南, 吴奎, 等. 多层土质边坡降雨入渗过程及稳定性分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2021, 38(3): 981-991.