基于长期监测的大厚度柔性基层沥青路面温度作用下应变响应规律及智能预测模型研究
Strain Response Characteristics and Intelligent Prediction Modeling of Thick Flexible-Base Asphalt Pavement under Temperature Action Based on Long-Term Monitoring
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.158212, PDF,   
作者: 徐智成, 宁鹏森, 邓胜良, 夏雨欣:湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭;聂忆华:湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭;湖南科大工程检测有限公司,湖南 湘潭
关键词: 大厚度柔性基层沥青路面长期监测温度场热–力响应横向应变PSO-CNNThick Flexible-Base Asphalt Pavement Long-Term Monitoring Temperature Field Thermal-Mechanical Response Transverse Strain PSO-CNN
摘要: 为揭示大厚度柔性基层沥青路面在温度作用下的应变响应规律,依托广西田新高速公路试验段长期监测数据,分析路面内部温度场、极值应变及平均横向应变预测性能。对监测数据进行缺失值补全、异常值剔除和平滑处理,并划分为0~10℃、10~20℃、20~30℃、30~45℃和45~60℃五类温度工况;采用温度波动幅值和衰减系数分析温度场的深度效应,选取典型层位研究温度–应变关系,同时引入多元二次多项式回归(QPR)作为统计基准,与CNN、PSO-CNN和PSO-BP模型进行比较。结果表明:路面内部温度波动随深度增加显著衰减并存在时间滞后,浅层沥青面层的应变温度敏感性明显高于深层基层;A1层最大横向应变与温度呈显著非线性关系,而B2层表现为近似线性弱响应。PSO-CNN在0~30℃范围内测试集R2为0.8410~0.8663,具有较好的综合预测性能;PSO-BP在30~45℃区间表现出局部优势,QPR在部分高温区间具有较好的趋势拟合能力,表明不同模型的适用性存在温区差异。研究结果可为大厚度柔性基层沥青路面的服役状态评估和智能养护提供参考。
Abstract: To investigate the temperature-induced strain response of thick flexible-base asphalt pavements, long-term monitoring data collected from a test section of the Tianlin-Xilin Expressway in Guangxi, China, were used to analyze the internal temperature field, extreme strain response, and prediction performance for average transverse strain. After missing-value imputation, outlier removal, and smoothing, the monitoring data were divided into five temperature ranges: 0~10˚C, 10~20˚C, 20~30˚C, 30~45˚C, and 45~60˚C. Temperature fluctuation amplitude and attenuation coefficients were adopted to quantify the depth-dependent characteristics of the pavement temperature field, and representative structural layers were selected to investigate the temperature-strain relationship. A multivariate quadratic polynomial regression (QPR) model was introduced as a statistical benchmark and compared with convolutional neural network (CNN), particle swarm optimization-based CNN (PSO-CNN), and particle swarm optimization-based backpropagation neural network (PSO-BP) models. The results show that temperature fluctuations within the pavement structure attenuate significantly with increasing depth and exhibit an evident time lag. The strain response of the shallow asphalt layers is more sensitive to temperature than that of the deep base layers. The maximum transverse strain in the A1 layer exhibits a pronounced nonlinear relationship with temperature, whereas the B2 layer shows an approximately linear and relatively weak response. Within the range of 0~30˚C, the PSO-CNN model achieves test-set R2 values of 0.8410~0.8663 and demonstrates favorable overall prediction performance. The PSO-BP model shows a local advantage in the range of 30~45˚C, while the QPR model provides satisfactory trend fitting in some high-temperature ranges, indicating that model applicability varies with temperature conditions. These findings provide a reference for service-condition assessment and intelligent maintenance of thick flexible-base asphalt pavements.
文章引用:徐智成, 聂忆华, 宁鹏森, 邓胜良, 夏雨欣. 基于长期监测的大厚度柔性基层沥青路面温度作用下应变响应规律及智能预测模型研究[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(8): 161-175. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.158212

参考文献

[1] 郑健龙, 吕松涛, 刘超超. 长寿命路面的技术体系及关键科学问题与技术前沿[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(30): 3219-3227.
[2] 《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国路面工程学术研究综述∙2024 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(3): 1-81.
[3] 朱洪洲, 雷蕾, 陈瑞璞, 等. 沥青路面温度应力研究进展[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 42(5): 44-53.
[4] 郝彦玉, 罗丹, 王锐, 等. 流体集热沥青路面温度特性及对城市地表环境温度的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2025, 42(1): 54-66.
[5] Chu, X., Dawson, A., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) Sensitivity Analysis of Pavement Response to Subgrade Moisture Variations. Journal of Building Engineering, 69, Article ID: 106285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106285
[6] 刘力源, 程怀磊, 张翛, 等. 服役柔性基层沥青路面力学响应实测与分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(4): 11-21.
[7] 潘勤学, 胡嘉, 张建, 等. 沥青路面实测面层层底横向水平应变响应分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2024, 41(10): 82-89.
[8] 谢恩连, 聂忆华, 黄新摇, 等. 大厚度柔性基层长寿命沥青路面试验研究[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(2): 198-207+216.
[9] 王旭东, 杨光, 钱振东, 等. 基于亿次加载试验的长寿命沥青路面性能演化规律及设计体系研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(12): 197-209.
[10] 罗瑶. 沥青路面温度应力场与温度疲劳特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2023.
[11] 严小重, 帅霞红. 不同温度下车辆荷载对沥青路面受力变形的影响[J]. 交通世界, 2025(31): 82-84+88.
[12] 李乃强, 吴秉军, 马东旭, 等. 基于数据驱动的沥青路面使用性能预测方法研究[J]. 公路, 2025, 70(7): 338-346.
[13] 张盼盼, 权磊, 李思李, 等. 基于LSTM-BPNN神经网络的沥青路面性能预测模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2023, 40(S2): 54-60.
[14] Liang, J., Gu, X., Jiang, D. and Zhang, Q. (2024) CNN-Based Network with Multi-Scale Context Feature and Attention Mechanism for Automatic Pavement Crack Segmentation. Automation in Construction, 164, Article ID: 105482.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105482
[15] Han, C., Zhang, J., Tu, Z. and Ma, T. (2024) PINN-AFP: A Novel C-S Curve Estimation Method for Asphalt Mixtures Fatigue Prediction Based on Physics-Informed Neural Network. Construction and Building Materials, 415, Article ID: 135070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135070
[16] Zhang, R., Hu, P., Zhong, Y., Wen, L., Ji, J. and Liang, L. (2025) Research Progress on Evaluation and Prediction of Degradation in Service Performance for Asphalt Pavement. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 12, 1011-1039.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2024.11.006
[17] 李雪连, 黄妍, 李雄. 基于PSO~灰色BPNN模型的路面使用性能预测研究[J]. 中外公路, 2025, 45(5): 46-52.
[18] 刘朝晖, 李文博, 柳力, 等. 内置应变传感器与沥青路面结构协同工作性能研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(4): 1-14.
[19] 许家璐, 薛斌, 阙云, 等. 沥青路面智能压实监测及质量评价方法[J]. 公路交通科技, 2025, 42(4): 48-56.