三重逻辑的张力与平衡：社工站建设政策执行的制度逻辑分析——以北京市D区为例

Tension and Balance of Triple Logics: An Institutional Logics Analysis of the Implementation of Social Work Station Construction Policy—A Case Study of D District, Beijing

摘要: 乡镇(街道)社工站建设是推进基层治理现代化的重要制度实践。文章借鉴多重制度逻辑分析框架，以北京市D区社工站建设为案例，考察政策执行中行政逻辑、专业逻辑与市场逻辑的结构性冲突及对政策效果的影响。研究发现，D区在行政逻辑强力驱动下实现了社工站的高覆盖率，但政策执行效果存在落差，专业逻辑在行政考核压力下面临台账化与活动化的双重挤压，市场逻辑则受限于经费保障和项目周期的约束而难以持续深耕。三重逻辑间的不平衡在于过度追求服务数量的提升却忽略了对于服务质量的保障。文章认为，政策优化的关键在于构建三重逻辑的动态平衡机制，从“保量”为核心转变为“保质”。

Abstract: The construction of social work stations at the township (sub-district) level represents a significant institutional practice for advancing the modernization of grassroots governance. Drawing upon the analytical framework of multiple institutional logics, this paper takes the construction of social work stations in D District, Beijing as a case study to examine the structural conflicts among administrative logic, professional logic, and market logic in policy implementation, as well as their impact on policy outcomes. The study finds that under the strong impetus of administrative logic, D District has achieved high coverage of social work stations; however, a notable gap exists between policy implementation and expected outcomes. Professional logic faces dual pressures under administrative assessment, manifested as the reduction of services to paperwork documentation and routinized activities, while market logic is constrained by institutional limitations such as funding guarantees and project cycles, making sustained and in-depth development difficult. The imbalance among the three logics lies in an excessive pursuit of service quantity at the expense of service quality. This paper argues that the key to policy optimization lies in establishing a dynamic balancing mechanism among the three logics, shifting the policy focus from “securing quantity” to “ensuring quality.”