“深度伪造”的刑法挑战与规制路径研究
Research on Criminal Law Challenge and Regulation Path of “Deepfake”
摘要: 人工智能“深度伪造”技术滥用引发的犯罪问题已对刑法体系构成严峻挑战。鉴于此类犯罪呈现法益侵害多样性的特征,我国现行刑法“事前打击 + 事后惩治”的规制模式已显现出明显的缺陷:事前打击模式对公开获取生物识别信息的行为存在规制空白;事后规制模式则面临罪名适用存疑的难题。对此,应坚持“技术中立性”理念,通过更新“公民个人信息”刑法内涵、强化伪造中间环节规制等路径,构建精准周延的刑法规制体系,在防范犯罪风险与保障技术发展之间实现平衡。
Abstract: The criminal problem caused by the abuse of artificial intelligence “deepfake” technology has posed a severe challenge to the criminal law system. This kind of crime is characterized by the infringement of diversity by legal interests, and there are obvious defects in the regulation mode of “pre-strike + post-punishment” in China’s current criminal law: the pre-strike mode has no regulation on the public access to biometric information. However, the ex post regulation mode faces the difficult problem of the application of charges. In this regard, we should adhere to the concept of “technology neutrality”, update the criminal law connotation of “citizens’ personal information”, and strengthen the regulation of forged intermediate links to build an accurate criminal law regulation system in GAI, so as to achieve a balance between preventing crime risks and ensuring technological development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
蔡士林. “深度伪造”的技术逻辑与法律变革[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(3): 131-140.
|
|
[2]
|
王德政. 针对生物识别信息的刑法保护: 现实境遇与完善路径——以四川“人脸识别案”为切入点[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(2): 133-143.
|
|
[3]
|
刘双阳. 犯罪协作视域下破解人脸识别认证行为的刑事规制[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2021, 36(4): 41-51.
|
|
[4]
|
刘涛. 网络帮助行为刑法不法归责模式——以功能主义为视角[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(3): 113-124.
|
|
[5]
|
冯明昱, 姜涛. “深度伪造”滥用行为的刑法规制[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2023(4): 127-135.
|
|
[6]
|
刘宪权. 人工智能时代深度伪造行为的刑法规制[J]. 政治与法律, 2025(11): 48-61.
|
|
[7]
|
李怀胜. 滥用个人生物识别信息的刑事制裁思路——以人工智能“深度伪造”为例[J]. 政法论坛, 2020, 38(4): 144-154.
|
|
[8]
|
孟醒. 深度伪造视听类电子数据的民事审查困境与应对[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 47(1): 86-95.
|
|
[9]
|
陈冉. 深度伪造涉性信息的刑法规制[J]. 法学, 2024(3): 76-90.
|