数字赋能乡村治理的多元主体协同机制研究——基于P镇“智慧养老”实践
A Study on the Multi-Actor Collaborative Mechanism of Digitally Enabled Rural Governance—Based on the Practice of “Smart Elderly Care” in Town P
摘要: 农村地区面临养老服务基础设施薄弱、专业人才匮乏与供给碎片化等多重约束,传统治理手段已难以有效回应这一复合型挑战。数字技术的下沉为破解乡村养老困局提供了新的可能。文章通过实地调查与半结构化访谈,以四川省N市P镇的智慧养老实践为研究对象,基于共生理论与滕尼斯共同体理论构建农村智慧养老服务共同体,考察政府、企业、社会组织与农村老年群体四方主体在数字平台中介下的协同机制及其运行逻辑。研究发现,数字平台在多元主体协同中扮演了共生界面的角色,通过降低信息不对称与协调成本重构了主体间的互动方式。多元主体协同的形成源于资源依赖与功能互补的结构性驱动,政府以政策工具撬动社会资源,企业以技术能力提升服务效能,社会组织以志愿互助填补情感关怀留白。
Abstract: Rural areas face multiple constraints such as weak infrastructure for elderly care services, a shortage of professional personnel, and fragmented service supply. Traditional governance approaches are no longer sufficient to address this complex challenge. The penetration of digital technology into rural areas offers new possibilities for solving the predicament of rural elderly care. Based on field surveys and semi-structured interviews, this study focuses on the smart elderly care practice in Town P, City N, Sichuan Province. Drawing on symbiosis theory and Tönnies’ community theory, it constructs a rural smart elderly care service community and examines the collaborative mechanisms and operational logic of four key actors—government, enterprises, social organizations, and rural elderly groups—mediated by digital platforms. The findings reveal that digital platforms serve as a symbiotic interface in multi-subject collaboration, reshaping interactions among actors by reducing information asymmetry and coordination costs. The formation of multi-subject collaboration is structurally driven by resource dependence and functional complementarity: the government leverages policy tools to mobilize social resources, enterprises enhance service efficiency through technological capabilities, and social organizations fill the emotional care gap through volunteer mutual assistance.
文章引用:林益宏. 数字赋能乡村治理的多元主体协同机制研究——基于P镇“智慧养老”实践[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(8): 610-616. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.158696

参考文献

[1] 谭志雄, 杨玲, 韩经纬. “四治融合”破解乡村治理复合碎片化——基于浙江省桐乡市微观实例[J]. 公共管理学报, 2023, 20(3): 142-154+175.
[2] 牛磊, 原璐璐, 丁忠民, 等. 制度赋权与技术赋能: 乡村内生性治理主体何以重塑——基于参与式治理视角的双案例分析[J]. 电子政务, 2024(4): 42-55.
[3] 王文彬. 乡村基层社会治理共同体主体自觉的培育[J/OL]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版): 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.19898/j.cnki.42-1704/C.20240111.04, 2025-09-29.
[4] 卓文昊, 赵群杭. 整体性治理视角下数字技术赋能社区健康养老服务机制研究——以上海市H街道为例[J]. 秘书, 2025(5): 16-28.
[5] 王晓慧, 向运华. 智慧养老发展实践与反思[J]. 广西社会科学, 2019(7): 81-88.
[6] 韦艳, 徐赟. 智慧健康养老产业发展的困境与路径——以陕西省为例[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2020, 33(3): 37-45.
[7] 王立剑, 朱一鑫, 马伟. 智慧健康养老产业的现实需求与发展进路[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 44(3): 31-39.
[8] 何秋洁, 羊芯谊, 陈国庆. 基于共生理论的四川农村医养结合养老服务模式研究[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 34(5): 94-100.
[9] 洪黎民. 共生概念发展的历史、现状及展望[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 1996(4): 50-54.
[10] 郭金云. 共生型社区服务的生成逻辑与优化路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(7): 29-38.
[11] 袁纯清. 共生理论——兼论小型经济[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 1998.
[12] 徐烨. 滕尼斯、涂尔干、杜威的共同体观: 溯源与启示[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2022(4): 116-121.
[13] 石元伍, 项良伟, 刘霞, 刘杰. 基于共生理论的社区“医康养护”共生服务系统设计研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(6): 74-83+143.
[14] 吴雪. 智慧养老产业发展态势、现实困境与优化路径[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(7): 1-9.
[15] 应何静怡. 智慧养老供需结构研究: 以杭州市为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2021.