交叠影响域理论下家校社协同育人现状、困境与优化路径研究——以成都市部分区域为例
Research on the Current Situation, Challenges, and Optimization Paths of Home-School-Community Collaborative Education under the Theory of Overlapping Sphere of Influence—Taking Some Areas in Chengdu as an Example
摘要: 家校社协同育人是我国基础教育改革的重要战略方向。本研究以爱普斯坦的交叠影响域理论为分析框架,采用问卷调查法和半结构访谈相结合的研究方法,对成都市城区部分中小学820名家长、61名教师进行问卷调查,并选取S社区、X社区两名管理者进行深度访谈,系统调研了当前成都市部分区域家校社协同育人的运行现状及困境。研究发现,调研区域内家校社三方实践行为与交叠影响域理论理想模型存在显著落差,家校沟通呈现浅层化特征,社区家庭教育服务供需匹配度不足,且不同学历、家庭结构的家长协同参与行为存在明显分化。基于调研结果,本文立足区域实证数据,以交叠影响域理论的外部模型、内部模型及六大实践模式为核心框架,深挖问题背后的制度、文化与资源成因,从制度保障、机制构建、实践操作和能力建设等多个维度,提出适配区域基础教育发展、可落地、可推广的家校社协同育人优化路径。
Abstract: Collaborative education among home, school, and community is an important strategic direction for the reform of basic education in China. This study adopts Epstein’s theory of overlapping spheres of influence as the analytical framework and employs a combination of questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews. It conducts surveys among 820 parents and 61 teachers from selected primary and secondary schools in urban areas of Chengdu, and selects two managers from Community S and Community X for in-depth interviews. The study systematically investigates the current operational status and challenges of collaborative education among home, school, and community in some areas of Chengdu. The research finds that there is a significant gap between the practical behaviors of home, school, and community in the surveyed areas and the ideal model of the theory of overlapping spheres of influence. Home-school communication exhibits superficial characteristics, the matching degree between supply and demand of community family education services is insufficient, and there is significant differentiation in collaborative participation behaviors among parents with different educational backgrounds and family structures. Based on the survey results, this paper, grounded in regional empirical data, takes the external model, internal model, and six practical models of the theory of overlapping spheres of influence as the core framework. It delves into the institutional, cultural, and resource causes behind the problems and proposes optimized paths for collaborative education among home, school, and community that are suitable for regional basic education development, feasible, and scalable. These paths are proposed from multiple dimensions, including institutional guarantees, mechanism construction, practical operations, and capacity building.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育部等十三部门关于健全学校家庭社会协同育人机制的意见[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/202301/t20230119_1039746.html, 2023-01-17.
|
|
[2]
|
教育部等十七部门联合印发《家校社协同育人“教联体”工作方案》[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202411/t20241101_1160204.html, 2024-11-01.
|
|
[3]
|
韩桐. 交叠影响域理论下城市小学家校社协同育人机制研究: 以S区为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2023.
|
|
[4]
|
Sheldon, S.B. and Epstein, J.L. (2005) Involvement Counts: Family and Community Partnerships and Mathematics Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 196-207. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.98.4.196-207
|
|
[5]
|
杨秀芹, 汪宇, 徐叶莹. 学生创新素养培育的多元主体协同研究——基于交叠影响域理论[J]. 当代教育科学, 2022(3): 3-10.
|
|
[6]
|
程龙, 周影. 交叠影响域理论视角下家校社协同育人的困境与突破[J]. 泰山学院学报, 2025, 47(3): 91-99.
|
|
[7]
|
吴重涵, 张俊, 王梅雾. 是什么阻碍了家长对子女教育的参与——阶层差异、学校选择性抑制与家长参与[J]. 教育研究, 2014, 38(1): 85-94.
|
|
[8]
|
朱永新. 家校合作激活教育磁场——新教育实验“家校合作共育”的理论与实践[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(11): 75-80.
|
|
[9]
|
陈丽清, 王艺璇, 张湘韵. 基于交叠影响域理论的中小学家校社协同育人机制构建[J]. 西昌学院学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(6): 117-125.
|
|
[10]
|
赵伟, 周然. 家校社协同育人政策的执行困境与破解之策——基于史密斯公共政策执行过程模型的分析[J]. 教育导刊, 2023(7): 33-42.
|
|
[11]
|
陈晓慧. “双减”时代智能技术的可为与能为——基于“家-校-社”协同育人视角[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(4): 40-47.
|
|
[12]
|
顾理澜, 李刚, 张生, 等. “双减”背景下数字化赋能家校社协同育人研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022, 43(4): 10-17.
|
|
[13]
|
邵晓枫, 罗志强. 教育强国建设背景下的家校社协同育人: 新价值、新逻辑与新机制[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 52(3): 98-106.
|