AI赋能新工科跨学科项目式教学资源体系建设与实践研究
Research on the Construction and Practice of an AI-Empowered Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning Resource System for Emerging Engineering Education
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1681775, PDF,   
作者: 李梦琳*:湖北师范大学文理学院,湖北 黄石;夏 巍#:湖北师范大学人工智能与计算机学院,湖北 黄石
关键词: 人工智能新工科项目式学习跨学科教育教学资源体系Artificial Intelligence Emerging Engineering Education Project-Based Learning Interdisciplinary Education Teaching Resource System
摘要: 新一轮科技革命和产业变革对工程人才培养提出了智能化、跨学科和实践化的新要求。新工科教育强调面向未来产业需求,推动人工智能技术、专业知识与真实工程问题深度融合。项目式学习作为培养学生复杂工程问题解决能力和创新实践能力的重要方式,与新工科建设目标高度契合。然而,当前跨学科项目式教学仍存在资源整合不足、实践场景有限、个性化指导薄弱和评价方式单一等问题。基于此,本文从政策逻辑、技术逻辑和知识逻辑三个维度分析AI赋能新工科跨学科PBL的内在机理,并提出由模块化课程群资源、“双映射”数字孪生实践平台和生成式AI学习支架构成的教学资源体系。研究认为,该体系有助于促进产教融合,提升学生工程实践能力、创新能力和跨学科素养,但在应用中仍需关注伦理安全、技术依赖、教师数智素养和数字鸿沟等问题。在此基础上,本文进一步提出由物理实体与资源层、数据接入与治理层、孪生建模与仿真层、决策回写与安全门控层、教学服务与评价层构成的技术架构,并以智慧交通项目说明仿真结果如何转化为可执行参数,反向指导实体设备调试与工程验证;同时将生成式AI学习支架设计为由检索增强生成知识库、学习者模型、项目阶段识别、多角色智能体和支架渐隐机制组成的可追踪系统。理论上,研究融合认知学徒制、支架理论、自我调节学习、认知负荷与分布式认知,明确“真实任务–双向表征–人机协同–反思调节–迁移创造”的作用链条。
Abstract: The new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation has raised new requirements for engineering talent cultivation, emphasizing intelligence, interdisciplinarity, and practice orientation. Emerging Engineering Education focuses on future industrial needs and promotes the deep integration of artificial intelligence technologies, professional knowledge, and real engineering problems. Project-Based Learning, as an effective approach to cultivating students’ ability to solve complex engineering problems and engage in innovative practice, is highly consistent with the goals of Emerging Engineering Education. However, current interdisciplinary PBL still faces problems such as insufficient resource integration, limited practical scenarios, weak personalized guidance, and a single evaluation approach. Therefore, this paper analyzes the internal mechanism of AI-empowered interdisciplinary PBL in Emerging Engineering Education from the perspectives of policy logic, technical logic, and knowledge logic. It further proposes a teaching resource system composed of modular curriculum resources, a dual-mapping digital twin practice platform, and a generative AI-driven learning scaffold. The study argues that this system can promote industry-education integration and improve students’ engineering practice ability, innovation capacity, and interdisciplinary competence. Meanwhile, issues such as ethical security, technological dependence, teachers’ digital and intelligent literacy, and the digital divide should be carefully addressed. On this basis, this paper further proposes a technical architecture consisting of five layers: The physical entity and resource layer, the data acquisition and governance layer, the digital twin modeling and simulation layer, the decision feedback and safety control layer, and the teaching service and evaluation layer. Taking a smart transportation project as an example, it illustrates how simulation results can be transformed into executable parameters, thereby providing reverse guidance for the debugging of physical equipment and engineering validation. Meanwhile, the generative AI learning scaffold is designed as a traceable system composed of a retrieval-augmented generation knowledge base, learner model, project-stage identification mechanism, multi-role intelligent agents, and scaffold fading mechanism. Theoretically, this study integrates cognitive apprenticeship theory, scaffolding theory, self-regulated learning theory, cognitive load theory, and distributed cognition theory, establishing an operational pathway of “authentic tasks-bidirectional representation-human-AI collaboration-reflective regulation-transfer and creation.”
文章引用:李梦琳, 夏巍. AI赋能新工科跨学科项目式教学资源体系建设与实践研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 1438-1448. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681775

参考文献

[1] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article No. 39.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
[2] 教育部办公厅关于推荐新工科研究与实践项目的通知: 教高厅函〔2017〕33号[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201707/t20170703_308464.html, 2026-07-17.
[3] 徐国艳, 杨世春, 张永飞, 等. “产教-科教”双融驱动的新工科“AI+”课程体系构建[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2026(2): 73-77.
[4] 金东寒, 马新宾. 推动新工科教育迭代升级支撑服务新型工业化建设[J]. 中国高等教育, 2024(5): 8-11, 21.
[5] Liu, C., Wang, G. and Wang, H. (2025) The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access, 13, 17895-17910.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3532595
[6] 谢冰蕾, 吴琳华. 融入区域发展的新工科教育建设: 逻辑、挑战与进路[J]. 中国高教研究, 2021(6): 51-56.
[7] Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T.J. and Chiu, T.K.F. (2024) A Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article No. 40.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z
[8] Borge, M., Smith, B.K. and Aldemir, T. (2024) Using Generative AI as a Simulation to Support Higher-Order Thinking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19, 479-532.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09437-0
[9] Kumar Karanam, S.A. and Hartman, N.W. (2025) A Systematic Review of Digital Twin (DT) and Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) for Smart Manufacturing Education. Manufacturing Letters, 44, 1597-1608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.179
[10] Omrany, H., Al-Obaidi, K.M., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Chang, R., Park, C. and Rahimian, F. (2025) Digital Twin Technology for Education, Training and Learning in Construction Industry: Implications for Research and Practice. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33, 1836-1870.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2024-1376
[11] 杨六栓, 陈艳浩. 数智化赋能高校新工科教育高质量发展的耦合逻辑与实践向度[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 52(6): 141-149.
[12] 方兵, 胡仁东. 我国高校人工智能学院建设: 动因、价值及哲学审思[J]. 中国远程教育, 2020, 41(4): 19-25.
[13] 陆国栋. “新工科”建设的五个突破与初步探索[J]. 中国大学教学, 2017(5): 38-41.
[14] Collins, A., Brown, J.S. and Newman, S.E. (2018) Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. In: Resnick, L., Ed., Knowing, Learning, and Instruction, Routledge, 453-494.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044408-14
[15] Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. (1976) The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
[16] Zimmerman, B.J. (2002) Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
[17] Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F. (2019) Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
[18] Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
[19] Mills, J.E. and Treagust, D.F. (2003) Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2-16.
[20] Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article ID: 102274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[21] Graham, R. (2018) The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education: Outcomes of Phase 1 Benchmarking Study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.