柴达木盆地盐碱地土壤质量评价及障碍因子特征
Soil Quality Assessment and Obstacle Factor Characteristics of Saline-Alkali Soils in the Qaidam Basin
DOI: 10.12677/ije.2026.153057, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张慧敏, 王雅琼*, 段成伟, 金 欣, 栾文莉:青海民族大学生态环境与资源学院,青海 西宁;青海省特色经济植物高值化利用重点实验室,青海 西宁;青海省生物技术与分析测试重点实验室,青海 西宁;杨雪瑾:青海民族大学生态环境与资源学院,青海 西宁
关键词: 柴达木盆地盐碱地土壤质量评价障碍因子Qaidam Basin Saline-Alkali Land Soil Quality Evaluation Obstacle Factor
摘要: 本研究以青海省都兰县、乌兰县、德令哈市轻度、中度、重度、极重度4类盐碱地为对象,分层采集0~10、10~20、20~30 cm土壤样品,测定pH、有机碳、全氮、全磷、全钾及交换性钙、镁、钠、钾9项土壤化学指标;运用主成分分析构建土壤肥力综合评价模型,结合Norm值与相关性分析筛选土壤质量评价最小数据集(MDS),引入障碍度模型定量诊断不同盐碱梯度、不同土层的土壤障碍因子。结果表明:① 土壤化学性质存在显著盐碱梯度与垂直剖面分异;轻度、重度、极重度盐碱地有机碳呈表层富集,中度盐碱有机碳集中于10~20 cm土层;轻度、中度盐碱地全氮、全磷呈表层富集,重度、极重度盐碱地全氮、全磷、全钾整体表现底聚特征;交换性盐基离子受阳离子交换、水分运移共同调控,重度盐碱地交换性盐基总量整体最高。② 土壤肥力综合得分随盐碱化加剧整体下降,轻度盐碱0~10 cm土层肥力最优,重度、极重度盐碱地各土层肥力得分均为负值;低盐碱土壤肥力表层富集规律显著,高盐碱梯度下肥力垂直分布格局反转。③ 基于主成分、Norm值与相关性筛选,确定由全磷、pH、交换性钠组成最小数据集,可解释80.49%土壤指标变异信息。④ 土壤障碍因子随盐碱程度、土层深度梯度更替:轻度盐碱地表层以交换性钠为核心障碍,中底层pH限制突出;中度、重度盐碱全域土层首要障碍为全磷,且重度盐碱全磷障碍度随土层加深持续升高;极重度盐碱0~20 cm土层以全磷为主要障碍,20~30 cm底层交换性钠成为首要限制因子。研究明确了柴达木盆地不同类型盐碱土肥力差异与分层障碍特征,可为区域盐碱地分层、分级差异化生态修复与培肥改良提供理论支撑。
Abstract: This study selected four grades of saline-alkali soils (light, moderate, heavy and extreme salinization) distributed in Dulan County, Wulan County and Delingha City of Qinghai Province as research subjects. Soil samples were collected from three vertical layers of 0~10 cm, 10~20 cm and 20~30 cm, and nine soil chemical indicators were measured, including pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), as well as exchangeable calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+). Principal component analysis (PCA) was adopted to establish a comprehensive assessment model for soil fertility. Combined with Norm value calculation and Pearson correlation analysis, the minimum data set (MDS) for soil quality evaluation was screened. Furthermore, an obstacle degree model was employed to quantitatively identify the dominant Obstacle factors across varying salinization gradients and soil depths. The results revealed four key findings: ① Soil chemical properties exhibited pronounced horizontal differentiation along salinization gradients and vertical stratification within soil profiles. Soil organic carbon accumulated predominantly in topsoil under light, heavy and extreme salinization, while its maximum concentration occurred at the 10~20 cm layer in moderately saline-alkali soils. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus were enriched in surface layers of lightly and moderately saline-alkali soils, whereas TN, TP and TK generally accumulated in subsoil layers under heavy and extreme salinization. Co-regulated by cation exchange processes and water-salt transport, the total exchangeable base (TEB) content reached the highest level in heavily saline-alkali soils. ② The integrated soil fertility score declined progressively with increasing salinization intensity. The 0~10 cm topsoil of lightly saline-alkali plots possessed the highest fertility value, and all soil layers under heavy and extreme salinization yielded negative comprehensive fertility scores. Surface accumulation of fertility was distinct under low salinization stress, whereas the vertical distribution pattern of soil fertility reversed when salinization intensity reached high levels. ③ A MDS consisting of total phosphorus, soil pH and exchangeable sodium was extracted via PCA, Norm value ranking and correlation screening, which could account for 80.49% of the total variance contained in all measured soil indicators. ④ Soil Obstacle factors shifted systematically with salinization severity and soil depth. Exchangeable sodium constituted the dominant obstacle in the topsoil of lightly saline-alkali land, while pH served as the major constraint in middle and deep layers. Total phosphorus was the primary Obstacle factor throughout all soil layers of moderately and heavily saline-alkali soils, and its obstacle degree increased continuously with soil depth in heavily saline-alkali profiles. For extremely saline-alkali soils, total phosphorus remained the dominant constraint within the 0~20 cm layer, while exchangeable sodium replaced TP as the primary Obstacle factor in the 20~30 cm subsoil. This study quantitatively characterizes fertility disparities and stratified obstacle patterns of diverse saline-alkali soils in the Qaidam Basin. The outcomes can provide theoretical foundations for stratified and classified differentiated ecological restoration and fertility amelioration of regional saline-alkali land resources.
文章引用:张慧敏, 王雅琼, 段成伟, 金欣, 栾文莉, 杨雪瑾. 柴达木盆地盐碱地土壤质量评价及障碍因子特征[J]. 世界生态学, 2026, 15(3): 516-531. https://doi.org/10.12677/ije.2026.153057

参考文献

[1] 张震中, 张金旭, 黄佳盛, 等. 不同排水措施对青海高寒区盐碱地改良效果的研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(12): 78-85.
[2] 严小功, 张金旭, 杨占云, 等. 柴达木盆地盐碱地现状及改良措施[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(7): 18-20.
[3] Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Yuan, F. and Chen, M. (2022) Rotation of Triticale and Sweet Sorghum Improves Saline-Alkali Soil and Increases Productivity in a Saline Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54, 910-925.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2137181
[4] Li, L., Yang, S., Hu, X., Li, Z. and Chen, H. (2024) The Combined Application of Salt-Alkali Tolerant Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms and Phosphogypsum Is an Excellent Measure for the Future Improvement of Saline-Alkali Soils. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, Article 1364487.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1364487
[5] Zhao, S., Wang, D., Li, Y., Wang, W., Wang, J., Chang, H., et al. (2024) The Effect of Modifier and a Water-Soluble Fertilizer on Two Forages Grown in Saline-Alkaline Soil. PLOS ONE, 19, e0299113.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299113
[6] 牛东玲, 王启基. 柴达木盆地弃耕地盐碱化形成机理及防治对策[J]. 草业科学, 2002, 19(8): 7-10.
[7] 魏晓斌. 松嫩平原西部盐碱地苜蓿建植技术[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
[8] Zhang, J.H., Ding, Q.D., Wang, Y.J., He, M. and Jia, K. (2023) Soil Quality Assessment and Constraint Diagnosis of Salinized Farmland in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Northwestern China. Geoderma Regional, 34, e00684.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00684
[9] Lei, S.H., Jia, X.X., Zhao, C.L. and Shao, M. (2025) A Review of Saline-Alkali Soil Improvements in China: Efforts and Their Impacts on Soil Properties. Agricultural Water Management, 317, Article ID: 109617.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109617
[10] 王跃锋, 李亚鹏, 何宁波, 等. 山西省应县盐碱耕地土壤质量评价与障碍诊断[J]. 土壤通报, 2025, 56(6): 1535-1546.
[11] 蒋丛泽, 受娜, 高玮, 等. 青藏高原东北缘不同土地利用类型土壤质量综合评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3279-3286.
[12] 陈巍, 陈邦本, 沈其荣. 滨海盐土脱盐过程中pH变化及碱化问题研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(4): 521-528.
[13] 杨秀娟, 胡玉昆, 房飞, 等. 不同类型盐碱土有机碳及微生物生物量碳的垂直分布特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(5): 1208-1214.
[14] 窦旭, 史海滨, 李瑞平, 等. 盐渍化土壤剖面盐分与养分分布特征及盐分迁移估算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(1): 279-290, 330.
[15] 李淑玲, 杨建国, 王晓静, 等. 银北盐碱地土壤交换性阳离子分布特征[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2014, 55(11): 33-35.
[16] 景宇鹏, 段玉, 妥德宝, 等. 河套平原弃耕地土壤盐碱化特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(6): 1410-1420.
[17] 姚荣江, 杨劲松, 姜龙, 等. 基于聚类分析的土壤盐渍剖面特征及其空间分布研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2008(1): 56-65.
[18] 冯君, 赵兰坡, 孙芸芸, 等. 吉林省西部地区苏打盐渍化草原不同利用方式对土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2009, 31(2): 190-194.
[19] 王靖荃, 李云, 王家辉, 等. 有机-无机肥耦合“增碳控盐”模式对中轻度盐碱地的改良效应[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(5): 70-76.
[20] 王宏伟, 周文喜, 包红霞, 等. 生物有机肥配施脱盐剂、脱硫石膏对苏打型盐碱地改良效果研究[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 38(1): 46-49.
[21] 张俊华, 黄华雨, 丁启东, 等. 河套平原盐碱化耕地土壤质量评价与障碍因素诊断[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(4): 2325-2336.
[22] 刘敬美, 李新平, 李文斌, 等. 陕西省渭南市卤阳湖盐碱地土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(5): 254-257+262.
[23] 赵茜宇, 于会彬, 杨芳, 等. 半干旱区湖泊湿地土壤养分与盐碱化特征研究-以岱海为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2023, 13(1): 188-196.
[24] 陈嘉兴, 黄立华, 晏益民, 等. 垦殖种稻年限对苏打盐碱土主要盐碱特性和磷素养分的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2019, 8(4): 443-452.