大学生恋爱主体性问卷的编制及信效度检验
Development of the College Students’ Romantic Subjectivity Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity Test
摘要: 当代青年在主体结构层面发生了“内在性转向”，“主体性”成为青年剖析亲密关系困境的核心话语。当概念缺失基于理论和现实的精准界定，其既无法客观分析青年困境，也难以提供真正辩证、可行的疏导思路。本研究基于Bowen自我分化理论，将恋爱关系中的主体性定义为个体在恋爱亲密关系中的自我分化水平，即个体在恋爱关系中能同时维持情感联结和独立自主的能力。本研究严格遵循标准化量表编制流程，编制当代大学生恋爱主体性问卷，通过文献梳理、开放式问卷、同行修订形成初始量表，以第一份大学生恋爱样本完成项目分析和探索性因素分析，以第二份大学生恋爱样本完成验证性因素分析与信效度检验。本研究得出以下结论：(1) 大学生恋爱主体性包含自我立场、情绪稳定性和非回避性亲密三维度；(2) 本研究编制的大学生恋爱主体性问卷具有理想的信度和效度，符合心理学测量标准，可以作为当代大学生恋爱主体性的测量工具。
Abstract: Contemporary youth have undergone an “inward turn” at the structural level of subjectivity, and “subjectivity” has become the core discourse adopted by young people to dissect dilemmas in intimate relationships. If a construct lacks accurate definitions rooted in theory and real-world contexts, it can neither facilitate objective analysis of young people’s predicaments nor yield truly dialectical and feasible intervention approaches. Based on Bowen’s Differentiation of Self Theory, this study defines romantic subjectivity in romantic relationships as an individual’s level of self-differentiation within romantic intimacy—namely, the ability to simultaneously preserve emotional bonds and maintain personal autonomy in romantic partnerships. Adhering strictly to standardized questionnaire development procedures, this research develops the College Students’ Romantic Subjectivity Questionnaire. An initial scale was formed through literature review, open-ended questionnaires and peer expert revisions. The first sample of college students in romantic relationships was utilized for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, whereas the second independent sample of dating undergraduates was employed for confirmatory factor analysis as well as reliability and validity tests. The conclusions of this study are presented as follows: (1) College students’ romantic subjectivity encompasses three dimensions: self-stance, emotional stability, and non-avoidant intimacy; (2) the self-developed College Students’ Romantic Subjectivity Questionnaire exhibits sound reliability and validity consistent with psychometric standards, and can be applied as a measurement instrument to evaluate romantic subjectivity among contemporary college students.
文章引用：曾泓玮 (2026). 大学生恋爱主体性问卷的编制及信效度检验. 心理学进展, 16(8), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.168409

参考文献

[1] 陈晓曼(2022). 马克思人民主体性思想的内在逻辑及当代价值. 品位∙经典, (3), 18-21, 65.
[2] 单志芳(2014). 大学生成人依恋、自我分化与亲密关系满意度的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[3] 高岚, 王可欣, 陈晨, 周奕欣, 金铃, 周明洁(2016). 大学生依恋类型、亲密关系满意度与抑郁的关系研究. 中国全科医学, 19(31), 3850-3854.
[4] 焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐(2025). 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响: 一项日记追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 41(5), 720-729.
[5] 涂翠平, 夏翠翠, 方晓义(2008). 西方心理分离的研究回顾. 心理科学进展, (1), 134-142.
[6] 万光侠, 魏浩天(2025). 文化主体性的唯物史观阐释. 马克思主义与现实, (4), 42-49.
[7] 向叶敏, 许智囉, 郑莉君(2015). 大学生恋人依恋现状及与亲密关系质量的关系. 健康研究, 35(1), 49-50, 53.
[8] 阎云翔, 康岚(2026). 退守内心(上): Z世代的内在性转向与“情感革命”. 当代青年研究, (2), 1-22.
[9] Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the Practice of Psychotherapy. In J. H. Brown, & D. N. Christensen (Eds.), Family Therapy: Theory and Practice (pp. 42-90). Garner Press.
[10] Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson.
[11] Bowlby, J. (1979). The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds. Tavistock Publications.
[12] Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment Styles and Personality Disorders: Their Connections to Each Other and to Parental Divorce, Parental Death, and Perceptions of Parental Caregiving. Journal of Personality, 66, 835-878.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00034
[13] Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
[14] James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Holt.
https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
[15] Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family Evaluation: An Approach Based on Bowen Theory. W. W. Norton & Company.
[16] McClure, M. J., & Lydon, J. E. (2014). Anxiety Doesn’t Become You: How Attachment Anxiety Compromises Relational Opportunities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 89-111.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034532
[17] Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Houghton-Mifflin.