概念整合理论视角下玩笑式调侃的认知机制:以微信朋友圈多模态互动为例
Cognitive Mechanisms of Jocular Mockery from the Perspective of Conceptual Blending Theory: A Case Study of Multimodal Interactions on WeChat Moments
摘要: 虚假不礼貌相关研究逐渐拓展至多模态互动领域。现有研究主要聚焦社会功能与语用策略,而对玩笑式调侃的意义建构及其内部认知加工机制,尤其是图文互动中的调侃,仍有待进一步考察。研究以概念整合理论为基础,提出一个融合多模态转喻与多模态隐喻的在线整合模型。该模型将网络表情包等视觉符号视为相对独立的认知输入,用于分析多模态符号之间的冲突与整合过程。案例表明,文字与视觉内容分别参与输入空间的建构,并调用面子威胁框架和非严肃框架中的相关结构。两类结构在互动语境的制约下经选择性投射形成玩笑式调侃的涌现意义。由此为分析图文玩笑式调侃提供一种可能路径,并补充社会功能研究对其意义建构过程的说明。
Abstract: Research on mock impoliteness has expanded to multimodal interaction. Existing studies focus primarily on social functions and pragmatic strategies, while the meaning construction and cognitive processing of jocular mockery in text-image interaction require further investigation. Drawing on Conceptual Blending Theory, this study proposes an online blending model that incorporates multimodal metonymy and multimodal metaphor. Visual signs, including internet stickers, are treated as relatively independent cognitive inputs. The model examines how multimodal signs conflict and integrate. Across cases, verbal and visual content contributes to the construction of input spaces and cues relevant structures from the Face-Threatening Frame and the Non-serious Frame. Interactional context constrains the selective projection of these structures, through which the emergent meaning of jocular mockery arises. The model therefore offers one possible approach to text-image jocular mockery that complements social-functional accounts by addressing its meaning-construction process.
文章引用:刘懿萱. 概念整合理论视角下玩笑式调侃的认知机制:以微信朋友圈多模态互动为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 860-869. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148851

参考文献

[1] 冉永平, 刘平. 从语言语用学到人际语用学看(不)礼貌的研究嬗变[J]. 外语教学, 2021, 42(4): 31-36.
[2] Haugh, M. and Bousfield, D. (2012) Mock Impoliteness, Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1099-1114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
[3] Haugh, M. (2014) Jocular Mockery as Interactional Practice in Everyday Anglo-Australian Conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 76-99.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
[4] Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2015) Jocular Mockery in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Contrastive Study of a Spanish and English Facebook Community. Journal of Politeness Research, 11, 289-327.
https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012
[5] Derks, D., Bos, A.E.R. and von Grumbkow, J. (2008) Emoticons and Online Message Interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 379-388.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307311611
[6] Zhao, L. (2020) Mock Impoliteness and Co-Construction of Hudui Rituals in Chinese Online Interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43, 45-63.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2020-0004
[7] Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[8] Culpeper, J. (1996) Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
[9] 谢朝群. 礼貌与模因: 语言哲学思考[M]. 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2011.
[10] Hay, J. (2001) The Pragmatics of Humor Support. Humor, 14, 55-82.
https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55
[11] Drew, P. (1987) Po-Faced Receipts of Teases. Linguistics, 25, 219-253.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
[12] Haugh, M. (2010) Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2106-2119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
[13] Locher, M.A. and Watts, R.J. (2005) Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research, Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1, 9-33.
https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
[14] 何静, 薛媛. 人际语用能力: 电视娱乐访谈中虚假不礼貌行为的语用研究[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报, 2017(1): 20-26.
[15] Yang, N. and Ren, W. (2020) Jocular Mockery in the Context of a Localised Playful Frame: Unpacking Humour in a Chinese Reality TV Show. Journal of Pragmatics, 162, 32-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.006
[16] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. 2nd Edition, Continuum.
[17] Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Aldine Publishing Company.
[18] Fauconnier, G. (1985) Mental Spaces. MIT Press.
[19] Fauconnier, G. (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174220
[20] Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.
[21] Dresner, E. and Herring, S.C. (2010) Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force. Communication Theory, 20, 249-268.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
[22] Riordan, M.A. (2017) Emojis as Tools for Emotion Work: Communicating Affect in Text Messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36, 549-567.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17704238
[23] Skovholt, K., Grønning, A. and Kankaanranta, A. (2014) The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 780-797.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063
[24] Kövecses, Z. (2017) Levels of Metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28, 321-347.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052
[25] Kövecses, Z. (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127
[26] Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511813085
[27] Walther, J.B. and D’Addario, K.P. (2001) The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324-347.
https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307
[28] Thompson, D. and Filik, R. (2016) Sarcasm in Written Communication: Emoticons Are Efficient Markers of Intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 105-120.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12156
[29] Maier, E. (2023) Emojis as Pictures. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 10, 317-355.
https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.4641
[30] Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. (1987) Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy. In: Button, G. and Lee, J., Talk and Social Organisation, Multilingual Matters, 152-205.
https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.33169485.10
[31] Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004) Relevance Theory. In: Horn, L.R. and Ward, G., The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, 607-632.