基于正态分布概率区间犹豫模糊集的多属性决策方法及应用
A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method and Its Application Based on Normally Distributed Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Sets
摘要: 针对现有概率区间犹豫模糊集普遍假设区间内隶属度服从均匀分布,与决策者“中间值可能性大、两端可能性小”的实际认知规律不符的问题,本文提出一种基于正态分布假设的概率区间犹豫模糊集,并构建相应的多属性决策模型。首先,将正态分布作为一般分布框架的特例引入概率区间犹豫模糊集,在区间关于均值对称的假设下,利用标准正态分布分位数建立区间端点、置信水平与正态分布参数之间的映射关系。其次,基于全期望公式与全方差公式,推导多区间聚合后的总体均值与总体方差公式。最后,将所提出的正态分布概率区间犹豫模糊集与TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)方法相结合,通过将原始准则扩展为“均值”与“负标准差”两个子准则,引入偏好系数以调节决策者对期望表现与稳定性的权衡,构建多属性群决策模型。汽车选购案例验证了该方法能够有效执行决策流程;控制变量实验表明,当将区间内部分布假设由正态替换为均匀后最优方案发生改变,验证了分布假设对决策结果具有实质性影响。本文方法通过引入更符合认知规律的正态分布假设,并协同考虑均值和稳定性两个维度,为不确定环境下的多属性决策提供了一种逻辑更完善、结果更鲁棒的新工具。
Abstract: To address the issue that existing probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets generally assume a uniform distribution of membership degrees within intervals, which contradicts the actual cognitive pattern of decision-makers that “intermediate values are more likely while values at both ends are less likely”, this paper proposes a probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set based on the normal distribution assumption and constructs a corresponding multi-attribute decision-making model. First, the normal distribution is introduced as a special case into the framework of probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Under the assumption that the interval is symmetric about the mean, the quantiles of the standard normal distribution are utilized to establish the mapping relationships among interval endpoints, confidence levels, and the parameters of the normal distribution (mean and standard deviation). Second, based on the law of total expectation and the law of total variance, the formulas for the overall mean and overall variance after aggregating multiple intervals are derived. Finally, the proposed normally distributed probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set is integrated with the TOPSIS method. By extending the original criteria into two sub-criteria, namely “mean” and “negative standard deviation”, and introducing a preference coefficient to adjust the trade-off between expected performance and stability, a multi-attribute group decision-making model is constructed. A car selection case verifies that the proposed method can effectively execute the decision-making process; a controlled variable experiment shows that when the intra-interval distribution assumption is changed from normal to uniform, the optimal alternative changes, confirming that the distribution assumption has a substantive impact on decision outcomes. By introducing the more cognitively plausible normal distribution assumption and jointly considering both the mean and stability dimensions, this paper provides a new tool with more complete logic and more robust results for multi-attribute decision-making under uncertain environments.
文章引用:黄志满. 基于正态分布概率区间犹豫模糊集的多属性决策方法及应用[J]. 应用数学进展, 2026, 15(8): 357-369. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2026.158359

参考文献

[1] Zhang, S., Xu, Z. and He, Y. (2017) Operations and Integrations of Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Decision Making. Information Fusion, 38, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001
[2] Hao, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H. and Su, Z. (2017) Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Set and Its Application in Risk Evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 127, 16-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.02.033
[3] Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K.S., Kar, S., Gupta, P. and Mehlawat, M.K. (2019) Interval-Valued Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making. Soft Computing, 23, 10853-10879.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3638-3
[4] Song, C., Zhao, H., Xu, Z. and Hao, Z. (2019) Interval-Valued Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set and Its Application in the Arctic Geopolitical Risk Evaluation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34, 627-651.
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22069
[5] Zhang, S., Xu, Z. and Wu, H. (2019) Fusions and Preference Relations Based on Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Group Decision Making. Soft Computing, 23, 8291-8306.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3465-6
[6] Torra, V. (2010) Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529-539.
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
[7] Ali, J., Bashir, Z. and Rashid, T. (2022) On Distance Measure and TOPSIS Model for Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: Application to Healthcare Facilities in Public Hospitals. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 12, 197-229.
https://doi.org/10.1108/gs-07-2020-0092
[8] 朱勇, 李得超, 郭倩男. 距离型概率区间犹豫模糊熵及其决策应用[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 47(6): 1178-1189.
[9] Deng, X. and Zhang, Y. (2026) An Entropy-and Cloud-TOPSIS-Based Decision-Making Framework under Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Environment: Application to Virtual Enterprise Partner Selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-025-02178-8
[10] Ruan, C., Gong, S. and Chen, X. (2025) Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making with Extended ELECTRE III Method and Regret Theory Based on Probabilistic Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 11, Article No. 92.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01645-3
[11] Liang, W., Rodríguez, R.M., Wang, Y., Goh, M. and Ye, F. (2023) The Extended ELECTRE III Group Decision Making Method Based on Regret Theory under Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 231, Article ID: 120618.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120618
[12] Xie, G., Wang, K., Wu, X., Wang, J., Li, T., Peng, Y., et al. (2023) A Hybrid Multi-Stage Decision-Making Method with Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Set for 3D Printed Composite Material Selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, Article ID: 106483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106483
[13] Zhu, C., Liu, X., Ding, W. and Zhang, S. (2024) Cloud Model-Based Multi-Stage Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method under Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 255, Article ID: 124595.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124595
[14] Yang, W. and Liang, C. (2025) A Large-Scale Consensus Decision-Making Model for Non-Cooperative Behavior Based on Incomplete Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Social Trust Networks. Information Sciences, 714, Article ID: 122196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2025.122196
[15] 陈惠琴, 黄韩亮. 概率区间犹豫模糊集的多属性群决策方法[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(6): 550-557.
[16] 费庭香. 基于概率区间犹豫模糊信息的多属性群决策方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2025.
[17] 朱国成, 张娟, 徐健. 概率区间值犹豫模糊集多属性群决策模型及其应用[J]. 中国计量大学学报, 2024, 35(1): 106-115.
[18] 朱国成, 何惠娟, 陈翠盈. 加权概率区间值直觉犹豫模糊集多属性群决策方法及应用[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 44(3): 1-10.
[19] 徐改丽, 吕跃进. 基于正态分布区间数的多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程, 2011, 29(9): 120-123.
[20] 丁登花, 毛军军. 正态分布区间数的包含度和可能度及其应用[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 36(9): 1136-1139.
[21] 毛军军, 王翠翠, 姚登宝, 等. 基于交叉熵的正态分布区间数多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(33): 44-48.
[22] 龚日朝, 潘芬萍. 非均匀分布下区间数排序可能度计算模型及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 220-230.
[23] 龚日朝, 李诗音, 谭可星. 带分布区间数的可能度计算模型及其排序[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(9): 2428-2446.
[24] 徐钰霞. 正态分布区间数的动态多属性决策方法及其应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2024.
[25] Liu, H. and Weng, S. (2024) A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method for Interval Rough Number Information System Considering Distribution Types. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 19, Article No. 6633.
https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2024.4.6633
[26] Yang, S., Jiang, W., Pedrycz, W., Wang, J. and Xu, T. (2026) A Soft Constraint Optimization Approach for Clustering in Large-Scale Group Decision Making Based on Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information. Applied Soft Computing, 197, Article ID: 115046.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2026.115046
[27] Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wang, J. and Shang, X. (2022) A Novel Two-Stage TOPSIS Approach Based on Interval-Valued Probabilistic Linguistic Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets with Its Application to MAGDM Problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 116, Article ID: 105413.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105413
[28] Ruan, C. and Chen, X. (2023) Probabilistic Interval-Valued Fermatean Hesitant Fuzzy Set and Its Application to Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Axioms, 12, Article 979.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12100979
[29] Noor, Q., Rashid, T. and Husnine, S.M. (2021) An Extended TDM Method under Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Environment for Stock Selection. PLOS ONE, 16, e0252115.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252115
[30] Shen, F., Huang, Q., Su, H. and Xu, Z. (2024) An Outranking Approach for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making with Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Information. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 137, Article ID: 109120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109120
[31] Liang, W. and Wang, Y. (2021) A Probabilistic Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method Based on Regret Theory. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, Article ID: 107532.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107532
[32] Song, C., Xu, Z., Hou, J. and Ji, J. (2024) The Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on the Regret Theory and Its Application in Investment Strategy. Soft Computing, 28, 4285-4298.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09594-8
[33] 张全, 樊治平, 潘德惠. 区间数多属性决策中一种带有可能度的排序方法[J]. 控制与决策, 1999, 14(6): 703-706.
[34] Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer.