浙江嵊泗贻贝养殖区海水中细菌与古菌群落的特征分析
Characteristic Analysis of Bacterial and Archaea Communities in Seawater from Mussel Culture Area of Shengsi, Zhejiang Province
DOI: 10.12677/ams.2026.133027, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 毛宏跃, 赵卫红, 陈风帆, 罗韩燕, 张 捷, 黄 备*:浙江省海洋生态环境监测中心,浙江 舟山;钱冠磊:舟山市嵊泗生态环境监测站,浙江 舟山
关键词: 高通量测序贻贝养殖区细菌和古菌群落结构High Throughput Sequencing Mussel Culture Area Bacteria and Archaea Community Structure
摘要: 我国是贝类养殖大国,浙江嵊泗海域是我国重要的贻贝产地。围绕嵊泗枸杞岛贻贝养殖区及其附近海域开展海洋生态环境综合调查,以期为海水养殖业的健康可持续发展提供技术支撑。应用Illumina HiSeq 16S rRNA高通量测序技术,在研究海域中鉴定得到细菌33门271科425属;古菌6门14科16属。从门水平上看,变形菌门(Proteobacteria)在各站位均表现出明显优势,其相对丰度占细菌总数的82.4%。其它较为丰富的门类包括放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、蓝细菌门(Cyanobacteria)和疣微菌门(Verrucomicrobia)。古菌中奇古菌门(Thaumarchaeota)在各站位均表现出明显优势,其相对丰度占古菌总数的96.0%,其它较为丰富的门类包括广古菌门(Euryarchaeota)、纳古菌门(Nanoarchaeaeota)、泉古菌门(Crenarchaeota)和Diapherotrites;从科水平上看,细菌中红细菌科(Rhodobacteraceae)是最主要的优势菌,其它主要种类还有Burkholderiaceae、Actinomarinaceae、Alteromonadaceae、黄杆菌科(Flavobacteriaceae)、假单胞菌科(Pseudomonadaceae)、Cyanobiaceae等;古菌中亚硝化侏儒菌科(Nitrosopumilaceae)是最主要的优势菌,其它主要种类还有Haloferacaceae、Nitrososphaeraceae Methanomethylophilaceae等。各测点微生物种类特异性较强,G4测点的细菌和古菌与其它测点区别较大。无论细菌和古菌群落,水温、悬浮物和pH是影响研究海域微生物群落分布最主要的因素。
Abstract: China is the largest producer of shellfish aquaculture, and the coastal waters around Shengsi serves as an important production area of mussels in China. A comprehensive marine ecological environment survey was carried out around Shengsi mussel farms in order to provide technical support for the sustainable development of marine aquaculture industry. In this study, metagenomic analysis based on the Illumina Hiseq 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing technology was applied. A total of 33 phyla, 271 families and 425 genera of Bacteria, and 6 phyla, 14 families and 16 genera of Archaea were detected from the sea water samples. At phylum level, Proteobacteria was the dominant group, comprising 82.4% of the total bacterial sequences, other abundant groups included the phylum Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia; and Thaumarchaeota was the dominant archaeal group, comprising 96% of the total archaeal sequences, Other abundant archaea groups included the phylum Euryarchaeota, Nanoarchaeaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Diapherotrites. At family level, Rhodobacteraceae dominated the bacterial abundance, and other major compositions included Burkholderiaceae, Actinomarinaceae, Alteromonadaceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae; Nitrosopumilaceae was the main archaeal group, and other abundant taxa included Haloferacaceae, Nitrososphaeraceae, Methanomethylophilaceae. The compositions of microbials in stations showed greater specificity, and bacterial and archaeal compositions at G4 site were largely different from those at other sites. Water temperature, suspended matter and pH were the most influential factors shaping the microbial community, bacteria and archaea included.
文章引用:毛宏跃, 赵卫红, 陈风帆, 钱冠磊, 罗韩燕, 张捷, 黄备. 浙江嵊泗贻贝养殖区海水中细菌与古菌群落的特征分析[J]. 海洋科学前沿, 2026, 13(3): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.12677/ams.2026.133027

参考文献

[1] 韩杨. 1949年以来中国海洋渔业资源治理与政策调整[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(9): 14-28.
[2] 廖凯, 杨正勇. 中国海水养殖业比较优势分析[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2019, 37(5): 22-29.
[3] 徐岩, 朱玉贵. 山东省海水贝类养殖产业变化特征分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(12): 215-220.
[4] Bodelier, P.L.E. (2011) Toward Understanding, Managing, and Protecting Microbial Ecosystems. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2, Article 80.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00080
[5] Madoni, P. and Braghiroli, S. (2007) Changes in the Ciliate Assemblage along a Fluvial System Related to Physical, Chemical and Geomorphological Characteristics. European Journal of Protistology, 43, 67-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2006.09.004
[6] Kato, S., Ikehata, K., Shibuya, T., Urabe, T., Ohkuma, M. and Yamagishi, A. (2014) Potential for Biogeochemical Cycling of Sulfur, Iron and Carbon within Massive Sulfide Deposits Below the Seafloor. Environmental Microbiology, 17, 1817-1835.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12648
[7] 修玉娜, 陈松泽, 李雪英, 姜亚洲, 等. 象山港典型生境沉积物反硝化细菌群落丰度与结构多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 84-92.
[8] 郭超. 象山港贝类养殖区海洋细菌多样性及季节变化特征[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2011.
[9] 谢玲, 李海燕, 徐华兵, 钟名其, 陈伟洲, 杜虹. 深澳湾海水养殖生态系统健康评估[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1233-1242.
[10] Arakaki, A., Shibusawa, M., Hosokawa, M. and Matsunaga, T. (2010) Preparation of Genomic DNA from a Single Species of Uncultured Magnetotactic Bacterium by Multiple-Displacement Amplification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 1480-1485.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02124-09
[11] Gans, J., Wolinsky, M. and Dunbar, J. (2005) Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil. Science, 309, 1387-1390.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112665
[12] Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., et al. (2004) Environmental Genome Shotgun Sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science, 304, 66-74.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093857
[13] Kinghorn, A.D., Chin, Y.W. and Swanson, S.M. (2009) Discovery of Natural Product Anticancer Agents from Biodiverse Organisms. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery & Development, 12, 189-196.
[14] 胡东. 凡纳滨对虾养殖水体中亚硝酸盐转化的微生物特征与细菌菌群动态变化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2017.
[15] 胡常巨, 熊金波, 陈和平, 王凯, 叶然, 崔永平, 朱建林, 张德民. 象山港网箱养殖区与非养殖区的细菌群落分布[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(24): 8053-8061.
[16] Beman, J.M. (2014) Activity, Abundance, and Diversity of Nitrifying Archaea and Denitrifying Bacteria in Sediments of a Subtropical Estuary: Bahía Del Tóbari, Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts, 37, 1343-1352.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9716-y
[17] 李斯远, 何治江, 吕泓玥, 汤秋晗, 等. 厚壳贻贝(Mytilus coruscus)养殖海域与天然生长海域的微生物群落比较研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2021, 52(1): 196-205.
[18] 马景雪, 张培玉, 王宗兴, 郑明刚, 高萍, 曲凌云, 郑风荣. 黄岛近海岸贝类养殖区细菌群落结构多样性及环境因子响应[J]. 水产学报, 2022, 46(6): 984-994.
[19] 刘强, 赵本宣, 李汝伟, 吴冬梅, 徐大鹏, 程传东, 赵淑江. 舟山群岛不同功能区划海域细菌群落结构分析[J]. 微生物学报, 2018, 58(2): 247-263.
[20] 尹冰玉, 章守宇. 枸杞岛海藻场沉积物细菌群落组成的初步研究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2011, 20(1): 126-130.
[21] 付新华, 刘国宁, 何健龙, 马元庆, 宋秀凯, 孟丽, 贾青妹. 山东省渤海海洋保护区典型海域表层海水微生物群落多样性分析[J]. 海洋科学, 2017, 41(1): 39-47.
[22] Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E. (1977) Phylogenetic Structure of the Prokaryotic Domain: The Primary Kingdoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 74, 5088-5090.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088
[23] 任立成, 李美英, 鲍时翔. 海洋古菌多样性研究进展[J]. 生命科学研究, 2006, 10(S1): 67-70.
[24] 张丽梅, 贺纪正. 一个新的古菌类群-奇古菌门(Thaumarchaeota) [J]. 微生物学报, 2012, 52(4): 411-421.
[25] 蔡小龙, 罗剑飞, 林炜铁, 田国梁. 珠三角养殖水体中参与氮循环的微生物群落结构[J]. 微生物学报, 2012, 52(5): 645-653.
[26] 陈烨, 张玉, 甄毓, 米铁柱, 贺惠, 王勋功. 南海东北部珠江口盆地沉积物中古菌群落垂向分布研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(5): 735-740.
[27] 张慧珍, 常永凯, 陈泉睿, 明红霞, 苏洁, 石岩, 殷旭旺, 樊景凤. 辽河口沉积物中古菌和细菌群落结构分析[J]. 海洋学报, 2018, 40(6): 113-130.
[28] 杨季芳, 王海丽, 陈福生, 屠霄霞, 陈吉刚, 冯辉强. 象山港海域细菌的分布特征及其环境影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(14): 4007-4018.
[29] 陈梦齐, 刘紫丹, 戴文芳, 叶仙森, 梁新友, 熊金波. 象山港电厂温排水增温对浮游细菌群落空间分布的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(20): 6574-6582.
[30] 夏耘, 邱立疆, 郁二蒙, 谢骏, 王广军, 余德光, 吉红. 生物絮团培养过程中养殖水体水质因子及原核与真核微生物的动态变化[J]. 中国水产科学, 2014, 21(1): 75-83.
[31] Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Nicolau, L.B., Marques, J.C., Morgado, F., Pastorinho, R. and Azeiteiro, U.M. (2003) Bacterioplankton Dynamics in the Mondego Estuary (Portugal). Acta Oecologica, 24, S67-S75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1146-609x(03)00016-x
[32] 陈明明, 王少璞, 韦梦, 何佳颖, 郑邦旭, 裘琼芬. 象山港网箱养殖区沉积物的古菌空间分布[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(14): 4099-4106.
[33] 江沛霖. 中国东南沿海部分区域微塑料附着微生物研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018.