构式语法下“X死我了”构式的语义与语用新探索
A New Exploration of Semantics and Pragmatics of the Construction “X Si Wo Le” (X-Death-Me-Prt) under Construction Grammar
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.148872, PDF,   
作者: 韦晓丽:广西大学外国语学院,广西 南宁
关键词: X死我了网络用语构式语法构式压制X Si Wo Le Internet Slang Construction Grammar Construction Coercion
摘要: 本文以现代汉语高频构式“X死我了”为研究对象,结合构式语法框架,探讨其在网络语境中的语义与语用演变。研究基于“新浪微博”平台的真实语料,采用定性分析方法,重点考察网络新兴成分(如“甜”“帅”“迷”等)进入构式后的意义生成机制。研究发现:在语义层面,相较于传统的构式压制机制,部分词汇义通过“词汇压制”覆盖构式义,其认知理据在于积极词汇的高突显性与主观评价性,使得构式整体呈现积极化、娱乐化表达;同时,该构式在构式网络中与其他表极端程度的构式形成对照,但其独特之处在于“死”所承载的致使性与主观失控感。在语用层面,该构式的功能已超越传统的消极情绪宣泄,逐渐演化为兼具情感宣泄、社群认同与幽默互动的网络表达手段。本文为理解汉语构式在新语境中的动态演变提供了新的证据与视角。
Abstract: This paper takes the high-frequency modern Chinese construction “X sǐ wǒ le” (X-death-me-Prt) as the research object and, within the framework of Construction Grammar, explores its semantic and pragmatic evolution in online contexts. Based on authentic data collected from Sina Weibo, the study adopts a qualitative analytical approach, focusing on the meaning-generation mechanisms after emerging online elements such as “tián” (sweet), “shuài” (handsome), and “mí” (fascinate) enter the construction. The findings are as follows: semantically, in contrast to the traditional mechanism of construction coercion, certain lexical meanings override the constructional meaning via lexical coercion, and the cognitive motivation for this lies in the high salience and subjective evaluativity of positive words, which endows the whole construction with positive and entertaining expressions. Meanwhile, although this construction contrasts with other extreme-degree constructions in the construction network, it retains a unique feature—the causativity and subjective loss of control carried by “sǐ”. Pragmatically, the function of this construction has gone beyond the traditional catharsis of negative emotions and has gradually evolved into an online expressive device that integrates emotional release, community identity building, and humorous interaction. This paper provides new evidence and perspectives for understanding the dynamic evolution of Chinese constructions in new contexts.
文章引用:韦晓丽. 构式语法下“X死我了”构式的语义与语用新探索[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148872

参考文献

[1] 徐银. 基于构式语法的汉语“形(动)死我了”句式研究[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 10(2): 79-84.
[2] 高菲. 口语句式“X + 死 + (我) + 了”的构式特点[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 8(2): 115-116.
[3] 刘欣朋. 浅析“X + 死我了”结构[J]. 语文建设, 2015(17): 72-73.
[4] Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P. and O’Connor, M.C. (1988) Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let Alone. Language, 64, 501-538.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
[5] Goldberg, A.E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, 231-262.
[6] Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, 4-5.
[7] 严辰松. 构式语法论要[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2006(4): 6-11.
[8] Traugott, E.C. and Trousdale, G. (2013) Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford University Press, 20-26.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
[9] 杨子, 王雪明. “好不AP”的构式新解——兼谈词汇压制下的构式稳定性[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2013(4): 39-42.
[10] 黄鸿辉. “你A, 我B”构式探究[J]. 语言研究集刊, 2023(2): 270-276+396.
[11] Langacker, R. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol 2): Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press, 214-215.
[12] Traugott, E.C. (1989) On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language, 65, 31-55.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414841
[13] Traugott, E.C. and Dasher, R.B. (2001) Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486500
[14] Traugott, E.C. (2010) (Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment. In: Davier, K., Diewald, G., Eiben, K., et al., Eds., Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, De Gruyter Mouton, 29-74.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
[15] Traugott, E.C. (2024) Rethinking the Relationship between Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and Textualization from a Constructionalist Perspective. Cognitive Semantics, 10, 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10060
[16] Langacker, R.W. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press, 62-68, 326-332.
[17] 李文浩. 基于突显观的构式研究——以现代汉语若干“全量/强调”义构式为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2011.
[18] 程亚恒. 夸张型排除构式“除了X(,)还是X”研究[J]. 语言学论丛, 2017(2): 261-282.
[19] 周敏莉. 极性程度构式“A到没朋友”研究[J]. 社会科学论坛, 2016(10): 76-85.
[20] 庞勇珍. 网络流行极性表达构式“一整个X住”的多维探析[J]. 唐山师范学院学报, 2023, 45(2): 31-37.
[21] 张谊生. 再论当代汉语程度促转模式“很 + X”的形化功效与成因——基于网络用语“很嗨、很哇塞”及“很凡尔赛”的观察视角[J]. 汉语学习, 2023(4): 3-14.
[22] 史璐洁. “(X)主打一个Y”构式负面评价功能研究[J]. 今古文创, 2026(7): 131-135.
[23] 于山蓉. “X刺客”的生成演变与主观评价功能[J]. 汉字文化, 2023(24): 112-114.
[24] 王寅. 构式压制、词汇压制和惯性压制[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009(12): 5-9.
[25] 王寅. “新被字构式”的词汇压制解析——对“被自愿”一类新表达的认知构式语法研究[J]. 外国语, 2011, 34(3): 13-20.
[26] 及轶嵘. “想死我了”和“想死你了” [J]. 天津师大学报(社会科学版), 2000(2): 78-80.
[27] 张子健. “X死我了”句法、语义及语用探究[J]. 语言与文化研究, 2023, 30(5): 17-21.
[28] 孙一涵. 从歧义分化到语用功能——网络流行语“×死我了”的多维研究[J]. 今古文创, 2025(23): 133-136.
[29] 方绪军, 李雪利. 构式“A死我了”和“把我A死了”——兼议变换分析之于句式和构式研究[J]. 华文教学与研究, 2018(2): 64-73.
[30] 赵笑杰. 浅析“×死我了”构式的生成理据[J]. 现代交际, 2019(16): 76-77.
[31] Krawczak, K. (2016) Objectivity, Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity: Integrating Two Cognitive-Functional Theories. Functions of Language, 23, 179-213.
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra