基于DEM数据的云南省地貌自动分类研究
A Study on Automatic Geomorphological Classification of Yunnan Province Based on DEM Data
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2026.154067, PDF,   
作者: 时有浩:云南师范大学地理学部,云南 昆明
关键词: DEM地形因子地貌分类云南省DEM Topographic Factors Geomorphological Classification Yunnan Province
摘要: 基于90 m分辨率的SRTM-DEM数据,以云南省作为研究区,利用ArcGIS分别对影响研究区地貌类型的地形因子进行分析,得出研究区内中海拔(高程:1000~3500 m)区域最广,占云南省总面积的52.75%,主要分布在云南省的中部和东部地区。地形起伏度为小起伏山地的地形分布最广,面积在整个研究区中占58.16%。云南省绝大部分地区的坡度在25˚以下,占了整个研究区面积的80.95%。研究区以浅切割山地为主,占总面积的42.98%,深切割山地面积最小,仅占研究区面积的4.60%,分布于西北部山区。筛选了云南省地貌分类的最佳地形因子为地形起伏度、海拔高度、坡度、地表切割深度四个地形因子指标,利用ArcGIS对四个地形因子进行组合,提取出了研究区25种地貌类型,结果表明研究区地貌特征总体比较破碎,其中浅切割小起伏陡中山和浅切割小起伏平缓中山为主要地貌,占研究区总面积的47.26%。研究成果为进一步对云南省地区的资源开发、土地利用和灾害防治等问题提供了数据参考。
Abstract: Based on SRTM-DEM data with 90 m resolution, Yunnan Province was taken as the study area, and the topographic factors affecting the landform types of the study area were analyzed by ArcGIS. It was concluded that the altitude area (Elevation: 1000~3500 m) in the study area was the widest, accounting for 52.75% of the total area, and was mainly distributed in the central and eastern regions of Yunnan Province. Topographic relief is the most widely distributed small relief mountain, accounting for 58.16% of the whole study area. The slope in most areas of Yunnan Province is below 25°, accounting for 80.95% of the whole study area. The study area is dominated by shallow cut mountain area, accounting for 42.98% of the total area, while deep cut mountain area is the smallest, accounting for only 4.60% of the study area, distributed in the northwestern mountainous area. The best topographic factors for geomorphic classification in Yunnan Province were selected as topographic relief, altitude, slope and surface cutting depth. By combining the four topographic factors with ArcGIS, 25 geomorphic types were extracted in the study area. The results showed that the geomorphic features in the study area were generally fragmented. Among them, the main landforms are the shallow and small relief mountains and the shallow and small relief mountains, which account for 47.26% of the total area of the study area. The research results provide data reference for resource development, land use and disaster prevention and control in Yunnan Province.
文章引用:时有浩. 基于DEM数据的云南省地貌自动分类研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2026, 15(4): 745-752. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2026.154067

参考文献

[1] 李炳元, 潘保田, 程维明, 等. 中国地貌区划新论[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(3): 291-306.
[2] 苏时雨, 李钜章. 地貌制图[M]. 北京: 测绘出版社, 1999.
[3] Burrough, P.A., van Gaans, P.F.M. and MacMillan, R.A. (2000) High-Resolution Landform Classification Using Fuzzy K-Means. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113, 37-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00011-1
[4] Bishop, M.P., Shroder, J.F. and Colby, J.D. (2003) Remote Sensing and Geomorphometry for Studying Relief Production in High Mountains. Geomorphology, 55, 345-361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-555x(03)00149-1
[5] Giles, P.T. and Franklin, S.E. (1998) An Automated Approach to the Classification of the Slope Units Using Digital Data. Geomorphology, 21, 251-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-555x(97)00064-0
[6] Miliaresis, G. and Argialas, D. (2000) Extraction and Delineation of Alluvial Fans from Digital Elevation Models and Landsat Thematic Mapper Images. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66, 1093-1101.
[7] Miliaresis, G.C. (2001) Extraction of Bajadas from Digital Elevation Models and Satellite Imagery. Computers & Geosciences, 27, 1157-1167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-3004(01)00032-2
[8] 张宝雷, 宋孟强, 周万村. GIS支持下三峡库区主要地类自动分类方法研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2006, 21(1): 71-76.
[9] 李爱农, 江小波, 马泽忠, 等. 遥感自动分类在西南地区土地利用调查中的应用研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2003, 18(5): 282-285.
[10] 王文, 黄瑾, 崔巍. 云贵高原区干旱遥感监测中各干旱指数的应用对比[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(19): 131-139+309.
[11] 汪凌. 美国航天飞机雷达地形测绘使命简介[J]. 测绘通报, 2000, 21(12): 38-40.
[12] 姜雨璇, 查小春. 基于DEM的巴山地区地貌区划研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(1): 127-132+139.
[13] 刘静, 丁林, 曾令森, 等. 青藏高原典型地区的地貌量化分析——兼对高原“夷平面”的讨论[J]. 地学前缘, 2006, 13(5): 285-299.
[14] 周成虎, 程维明, 钱金凯, 等. 中国陆地1:100万数字地貌分类体系研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2009, 11(6): 707-724.
[15] 涂汉明, 刘振东. 中国地势起伏度研究[J]. 测绘学报, 1991(4): 311-319.
[16] 宁婷, 崔伟, 马晓勇. 基于均值变点法提取地形起伏度的影响因素分析——以黄河流域(山西段)为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(2): 159-163.
[17] 姜瑾斐, 公培臻, 王栋, 等. 基于SRTM的山东省地形起伏度研究[J]. 河北地质大学学报, 2021, 44(3): 71-75.
[18] 何振芳, 赵牡丹, 韩羽. 不同地貌类型坡度提取算法的比较[J]. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(6): 126-129.
[19] 王红, 王均. 国家基本地理单元数据集的初步研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2004, 29(3): 22-25.
[20] 江冲亚, 方红亮, 魏珊珊. 地表粗糙度参数化研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(3): 292-303.
[21] 汤国安, 刘学军, 闾国年. 数字高程模型及地学分析的原理与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
[22] 沈玉昌. 沈玉昌与中国现代地貌学[J]. 地理研究, 1997(1): 77-84.
[23] 梁宏艳, 赵尚民, 马顶. 基于ALOS DEM的山西省西山矿区地貌形态类型提取[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2023, 54(5): 950-958.
[24] 赵青松. 黔西南州数字地貌类型划分及信息提取[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2020.