海岛旅游目的地形象感知研究——以北海涠洲岛为例
Research on the Perceived Image of Island Tourism Destinations —A Case Study of Weizhou Island, Beihai
摘要: 海岛旅游是我国蓝色经济的重要支柱之一,旅游目的地形象作为目的地营销的核心要素,直接影响游客决策与目的地市场竞争力。传统问卷调研存在样本代表性有限、历时性不足等局限,社交媒体网络文本为旅游形象研究提供了新的数据来源与研究路径。本文以广西北海涠洲岛为案例,基于认知–情感理论模型,整合携程、马蜂窝、去哪儿三大旅游平台1930条有效游客评论与218份有效问卷数据,综合运用内容分析、扎根理论三级编码与ROST CM6.0工具,从认知与情感维度解析游客对涠洲岛的目的地形象感知特征。研究发现,在认知层面,游客对涠洲岛旅游资源感知度最高,且以自然资源为核心,人文资源、旅游购物及管理服务设施关注度较低;两类研究数据在旅游资源维度结论高度一致,旅游活动维度的感知差异与海岛旅游季节性及天气影响密切相关。情感层面,游客整体评价以积极为主,正向感知源于优质自然景观;消极评价占比偏低,集中于物价水平、交通便利性、市场经营秩序与基础设施配套。本研究验证了网络文本与问卷结合的混合研究方法可弥补单一方法的缺陷,提升旅游目的地形象感知研究的全面性与科学性,相关优化建议可为涠洲岛及同类海岛旅游目的地的形象塑造与高质量发展提供参考。
Abstract: Island tourism serves as a vital growth pole of China’s blue economy. As a core component of destination marketing, tourism destination image exerts a direct impact on tourists’ decision-making and the market competitiveness of tourist destinations. Traditional questionnaire surveys are constrained by limited sample representativeness and insufficient diachronic coverage, while online texts from social media have provided new data sources and research approaches for tourism image research. Taking Weizhou Island in Beihai, Guangxi as the research case and based on the cognitive-affective theoretical model, this study integrates 1930 valid tourist reviews published from 2018 to 2022 on three major tourism platforms (Ctrip, Mafengwo and Qunar) with 218 valid questionnaires. By adopting content analysis, grounded theory three-level coding and the ROST CM6.0 tool, this paper explores tourists’ perception characteristics of Weizhou Island’s destination image from both cognitive and affective dimensions. The findings indicate that at the cognitive level, tourists show the highest perception of the island’s tourism resources with natural resources as the core, while cultural resources, tourism shopping and management service facilities receive relatively low attention. The results from online texts and questionnaires are highly consistent in the tourism resource dimension, and the perceptual difference in the tourism activity dimension is closely related to the seasonality of island tourism and weather conditions. At the affective level, tourists’ overall evaluation is predominantly positive. Positive perceptions mainly stem from premium natural landscapes, while negative evaluations account for a low proportion and are concentrated on commodity prices, transportation accessibility, market operation order and supporting infrastructure. This study confirms that the combination of online text analysis and questionnaire survey can compensate for the limitations of single research methods and enhance the comprehensiveness and scientific rigor of tourism destination image perception research. Targeted optimization proposals are put forward accordingly, which can provide references for the image building and high-quality development of Weizhou Island and similar island tourism destinations.
文章引用:邓钰女, 王颖, 张承毕, 杨秀荣. 海岛旅游目的地形象感知研究——以北海涠洲岛为例[J]. 地理科学研究, 2026, 15(4): 795-805. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2026.154072

参考文献

[1] 黄博, 姜德刚, 丰爱平, 林雪萍. 我国海岛旅游高质量发展的建议[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(6): 72-77.
[2] 董朝阳, 童亿勤, 薛东前, 等. 海岛旅游文化景观特征及影响因素分析——以舟山桃花岛为例[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(5): 98-107.
[3] 刘晓丽, 王淼. 涠洲岛旅游目的地投射形象与感知形象对比研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报(中英文), 2026, 48(1): 229-238.
[4] Hunt, J.D. (1971) Image—A Factor in Tourism. Prentice Hall.
[5] Baloglu, S. and McCleary, K.W. (1999) A Model of Destination Image Formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 868-897.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-7383(99)00030-4
[6] Beerli, A. and Martín, J.D. (2004) Factors Influencing Destination Image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 657-681.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.010
[7] 李蕾蕾. 人-人感知系统: 旅游地形象设计新领域[J]. 人文地理, 1999(4): 10-14.
[8] 刘建峰, 王桂玉, 张晓萍. 基于表征视角的旅游目的地形象内涵及其建构过程解析——以丽江古城为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(3): 48-54.
[9] 吴小根, 杜莹莹. 旅游目的地游客感知形象形成机理与实证——以江苏省南通市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(9): 1554-1565.
[10] 保继刚. 旅游开发研究原理、方法、实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996: 183-185.
[11] 刘睿文, 吴殿廷, 肖星, 雷引周. 旅游形象认知的时间顺序对旅游目的地形象认知的影响研究——以银川沙湖与榆林红碱淖为例[J]. 经济地理, 2006(1): 145-150.
[12] 张宏梅, 陆林, 章锦河. 感知距离对旅游目的地之形象影响的分析——以五大旅游客源城市游客对苏州周庄旅游形象的感知为例[J]. 人文地理, 2006(5): 25-30+83.
[13] 杨永德, 白丽明, 苏振. 旅游目的地形象的结构化与非结构化比较研究——以阳朔旅游形象测量分析为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2007(4): 53-57.
[14] Fakeye, P.C. and Crompton, J.L. (1991) Image Differences between Prospective, First-Time, and Repeat Visitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 30, 10-16.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759103000202
[15] Tapachai, N. and Waryszak, R. (2000) An Examination of the Role of Beneficial Image in Tourist Destination Selection. Journal of Travel Research, 39, 37-44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900105
[16] 方世敏, 黄玲. 论中国西部地区旅游目的地形象塑造[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2001(6): 115-118.
[17] 李蕾蕾. 旅游目的地形象的空间认知过程与规律[J]. 地理科学, 2000(6): 563-568.
[18] 吕帅. 国外旅游形象研究及其对国内的启示——基于1996年-2007年TM和ATR所载文献[J]. 旅游科学, 2009, 23(1): 38-43.
[19] 程圩, 郭昳岚. 目的地投射形象与旅游者感知形象差异分析——以西安为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(6): 902-906.
[20] 张灵灵, 李宗霖, 李辉, 等. 基于社交媒体数据的海滨旅游地形象多元挖掘路径与方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2026, 28(6): 1870-1888.
[21] 王媛, 许鑫, 冯学钢, 等. 基于文本挖掘的古镇旅游形象感知研究——以朱家角为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2013, 27(5): 86-95.
[22] 王承云, 戴添乐, 蒋世敏, 等. 基于网络大数据的上海红色旅游形象感知与情感评价研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2022, 36(2): 138-150.
[23] 徐凤增, 袭威. 基于游客数字叙事的黄河旅游目的地形象与文化传播研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(5): 1-8+172.
[24] 刘瑛. 基于游客网络评论的旅游目的地形象感知特征与优化路径[J]. 经济地理, 2026, 46(3): 259-268.