基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的养老服务质量评价研究
Research on the Evaluation of Elderly Care Service Quality Based on the AHP-TOPSIS Model
摘要: 随着全球人口老龄化的加剧,养老服务质量成为社会关注的焦点。为了提升养老服务水平,本研究采用AHP (层次分析法)和TOPSIS (逼近理想解的排序方法)相结合的模型,即AHP-TOPSIS模型,对社会保障体系中的养老服务质量进行综合评价。研究构建包含服务内容、服务效能、服务环境、服务管理四个维度的养老服务质量评价指标体系,服务内容主要考察养老服务的种类和覆盖面;服务效能主要考察服务的专业性、及时性和有效性;服务环境主要考察服务设施的完善程度和安全性;服务管理主要考察服务机构的组织结构和运营效率。通过对这些维度进行分析,基于养老服务机构实际数据进行实证研究,研究发现服务效能是评价养老服务质量的关键因素之一。服务环境对养老服务质量也具有重要影响。完善的服务设施和舒适的服务环境能够提高老年人的生活质量和幸福感。不同养老机构在养老服务质量方面存在差异。因此,政府和社会机构应根据实际情况,制定针对性的政策措施,促进养老服务质量提升。
Abstract: With the intensification of global population aging, the quality of elderly care services has become a focal point of social attention. To enhance the level of elderly care services, this study adopts a model combining AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution), namely the AHP-TOPSIS model, to comprehensively evaluate the quality of elderly care services within the social security system. The study constructs an evaluation index system for elderly care service quality, encompassing four dimensions: service content, service efficiency, service environment, and service management. Service content primarily assesses the types and coverage of elderly care services; service efficiency evaluates the professionalism, timeliness, and effectiveness of services; service environment examines the completeness and safety of service facilities; and service management assesses the organizational structure and operational efficiency of service institutions. Through analyzing these dimensions and conducting empirical research based on actual data from elderly care service institutions, the study finds that service efficiency is one of the key factors in evaluating the quality of elderly care services. Service environment also has a significant impact on the quality of elderly care services. Improved service facilities and a comfortable service environment can enhance the quality of life and sense of happiness of the elderly. Different elderly care institutions vary in terms of the quality of their elderly care services. Therefore, governments and social institutions should formulate targeted policies and measures based on actual conditions to promote the improvement of the quality of elderly care services.
文章引用:王波敏. 基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的养老服务质量评价研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 685-694. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138609

参考文献

[1] 杨翠迎. 我国社会养老服务发展转变与质量提升——基于新中国成立70年的回顾[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2020(3): 111-118.
[2] 赵娜, 方卫华. 城市机构养老服务质量评价影响因素研究——基于个体差异的视角[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 51(2): 64-69.
[3] 张园, 董晶晶, 连楠楠, 等. 基于公办与民办差异视角的养老机构医养结合服务质量评价研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(7): 822-828.
[4] 蒲敏蕊, 朱庆华. 养老服务质量评价研究的系统综述[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2024, 45(3): 1-7, 15.
[5] 2025保障和改善民生怎么做∙养老篇丨以高质量普惠型养老服务推动实现“老有所养” [EB/OL].
https://www.mca.gov.cn/zt/n2916/n2920/c1662004999980003202/content.html, 2025-01-14.
[6] 陆杰华. 构建适合中国式现代化特色的养老服务质量评估体系探究[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 24(6): 3-10, 129.
[7] 韩振燕, 周文, 柳汀. 养老服务质量控制的行为偏好、驱动逻辑及应对策略[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2025, 32(8): 65-70, 76.
[8] 李运华, 冯玉莹. 健康老龄化视域下“医养结合嵌入式”养老服务的质量评价研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 41(4): 95-105.
[9] 骆潇蔓. 嵌入式养老服务质量评价研究——以上海市中心城区为例[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2024, 12(5): 66-78.
[10] 汪圆圆, 宋文婷, 解晨, 等. 我国社区医养结合服务及质量评价体系研究[J]. 医学信息, 2024, 37(7): 173-178, 183.
[11] Smith, S., Travers, C., Martin-Khan, M., Webb, I., Miller, E., Thompson, J., et al. (2024) Person-Centred Quality Indicators for Australian Aged Care Assessment Services: A Mixed Methods Study. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10, Article No. 88.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00606-x
[12] Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, Z. and Qiu, Z. (2024) Improving Life Quality for the Aged: A Comprehensive Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Long-Term Care Facilities in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1488653.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488653
[13] 高晶, 肖玉华, 耿桂灵, 等. 养老机构照护服务质量评价指标的构建及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(4): 538-542.
[14] 王剑菊, 孙远太. 政策工具配置与标准体系构建的互动机制研究——基于“工具-标准-效力”三维框架的智慧养老政策量化分析[J]. 标准科学, 2025(7): 90-97.