人工智能前沿融入《数学分析》的教学重构——“一图三层五环”模式及实施路径
Instructional Reconstruction of Mathematical Analysis by Integrating Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence—The “One-Map, Three-Level, Five-Cycle” Model and Its Implementation Path
摘要: 面向人工智能应用对数学基础、算法解释与工程迁移能力提出的新要求,针对《数学分析》课程中理论知识与算法场景割裂、抽象概念呈现单一、实践任务碎片化以及生成式人工智能使用规范缺位等问题,采用文献研究、设计研究、行动研究与专家评议相结合的方法,构建“一图三层五环”教学重构模式。其中,“一图”是数学分析知识与人工智能技术的双向映射图谱;“三层”依次为概念锚定、算法阐释和工程迁移;“五环”包括问题情境、数学推导、代码实现、可视诊断与迁移反思。研究进一步设计梯度下降、链式法则与误差反向传播、管网仿真模型参数调优等案例,并建立与课程目标一致的多元评价量规和“可用–需核–须述–可追”的人工智能使用规则。该模式把人工智能由外置教学工具转化为检验数学概念、定理条件和知识迁移的应用语境,在不削弱证明训练的前提下形成可实施、可评价、可迭代的课程改革路径。
Abstract: To respond to the growing demand for mathematical foundations, algorithmic interpretation, and engineering transfer in artificial-intelligence applications, this study addresses four persistent problems in Mathematical Analysis: the separation of theory from algorithmic contexts, limited representations of abstract concepts, fragmented practical tasks, and the absence of explicit rules for the use of generative artificial intelligence. This study employs a combination of methods including literature review, design-based research, action research, and expert review. The resulting “one-map, three-level, five-cycle” model consists of a bidirectional knowledge map linking Mathematical Analysis to artificial-intelligence techniques; three progressive levels—concept anchoring, algorithm interpretation, and engineering transfer; and five learning cycles—problem context, mathematical derivation, code implementation, visual diagnosis, and transfer reflection. Representative cases are developed around gradient descent, the chain rule and backpropagation, and parameter tuning for a pipeline-network simulation model. A multidimensional assessment rubric and a four-part governance rule—permitted use, required verification, mandatory disclosure, and traceability—are also proposed. This model transforms artificial intelligence from an external teaching tool into an application context for testing mathematical concepts, theorems, and knowledge transfer, forming an implementable, evaluable, and iterative curriculum reform path without weakening proof training.
文章引用:杨普天. 人工智能前沿融入《数学分析》的教学重构——“一图三层五环”模式及实施路径[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 2130-2142. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681860

参考文献

[1] 国务院关于印发新一代人工智能发展规划的通知 国发〔2017〕35号[EB/OL].
https://app.www.gov.cn/govdata/gov/201707/20/408540/article.html, 2017-07-20.
[2] 教育部关于印发《高等学校人工智能创新行动计划》的通知 教技〔2018〕3号[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5443346.htm, 2018-04-02.
[3] Miao, F. and Holmes, W. (2023) Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
[4] Miao, F. and Cukurova, M. (2024) AI Competency Framework for Teachers. UNESCO.
[5] 陈纪修, 于崇华, 金路. 数学分析[M]. 第3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2019.
[6] 赵楠, 叶俊佑. 数学分析课程与人工智能技术深度融合的教学[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(1): 1618-1623.
[7] 杨洁, 郑晴慧, 何郁波. 核心素养视域下师范类“数学分析”课程教学改革实践[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(9): 589-593.
[8] 杨一浓, 王金环, 刘生全, 田更. 基于真实问题的数学分析课程教学改革[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(8): 191-196.
[9] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article No. 39.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
[10] Ouyang, F. and Jiao, P. (2021) Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Three Paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article ID: 100020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
[11] Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020) What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
[12] Biggs, J. (1996) Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347-364.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138871
[13] Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. (2006) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108, 1017-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[14] Wang, F. and Hannafin, M.J. (2005) Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5-23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504682
[15] Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
[16] Arcavi, A. (2003) The Role of Visual Representations in the Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215-241.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024312321077
[17] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014) Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8410-8415.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
[18] Mayer, R.E. (2021) Multimedia Learning. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press.
[19] Deisenroth, M.P., Faisal, A.A. and Ong, C.S. (2020) Mathematics for Machine Learning. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679930
[20] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. (2016) Deep Learning. MIT Press.
[21] Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1986) Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
[22] Bottou, L., Curtis, F.E. and Nocedal, J. (2018) Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning. SIAM Review, 60, 223-311.
https://doi.org/10.1137/16m1080173
[23] Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. (2004) Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511804441
[24] Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J. (2015) Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, 7-9 May 2015, 1-13.
[25] Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article ID: 102274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274