《北京折叠》英译本的读者召唤与文化知识重构研究
Reader Invocation and Cultural Knowledge Reconstruction in the English Translation of Folding Beijing
摘要: 郝景芳《北京折叠》的英译本成功进入英语世界并获得雨果奖,是中国科幻文学“走出去”的标志性事件。本研究以读者反应批评与知识翻译学为理论框架,通过对中英文本的细读比对,分析刘宇昆翻译中的读者召唤策略与文化知识重构策略。研究发现,刘宇昆通过世界构建的结构化处理、情绪表达的外显化翻译及人物内心活动的强化,降低了英语读者的情感进入门槛;通过社会分层机制的可读化、城市治理机制的去地域化及文化符号的解释化翻译,实现了中国经验的可理解转化。这两种策略协同作用,使《北京折叠》从中国城市寓言转化为全球可读的科幻批判。研究揭示,译者不仅是语言转换者,更是文化策展人与意义生产者,其主体性介入是中国文学跨文化传播的关键环节。
Abstract: The English translation of Hao Jingfang’s Folding Beijing, translated by Ken Liu, successfully entered the Anglophone world and won the Hugo Award, marking a landmark event in Chinese science fiction’s global dissemination. Drawing upon reader-response criticism and transknowletology as theoretical frameworks, this study conducts a comparative close reading of the Chinese and English texts to analyze Ken Liu’s reader-invoking strategies and cultural knowledge reconstruction strategies. The findings reveal that Liu lowers the emotional threshold for English readers through structural processing of world-building, externalization of emotional expressions, and intensification of characters’ inner activities. Simultaneously, he achieves the comprehensible transformation of Chinese experiences through the readability of social stratification mechanisms, de-territorialization of urban governance mechanisms, and explanatory translation of cultural symbols. The synergy of these two strategies transforms Folding Beijing from a Chinese urban allegory into a globally resonant science-fictional critique. The study demonstrates that the translator is not merely a linguistic converter but a cultural curator and meaning producer, whose subjective intervention constitutes a crucial link in the cross-cultural dissemination of Chinese literature.
文章引用:段可欣. 《北京折叠》英译本的读者召唤与文化知识重构研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 1206-1213. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148889

参考文献

[1] 万晓. 《三体》刘宇昆英译本研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2016.
[2] 阮姗. 译介学视角下《三体》英译本研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2017.
[3] 丁慧慧. 从期待视野视角看《三体》的英译[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2017.
[4] 袁思琪. 刘宇昆英译科幻小说研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018.
[5] 张馨元. 乔治∙斯坦纳阐释学指导下科幻小说翻译中的译者主体性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 吉林: 北华大学, 2018.
[6] 梁悦, 孙会军. 刘宇昆的翻译思想研究——以《北京折叠》的英译本为例[J]. 翻译论坛, 2018(1): 54-58.
[7] 甄宗波. 刘宇昆科幻小说中的东方形象探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
[8] 宋欣阳. 刘宇昆译著及原著词汇特征对比分析[J]. 文学教育(下), 2020(9): 64-65.
[9] 张云露. 科幻小说的翻译风格初探——以刘宇昆译本《北京折叠》为例[J]. 英语教师, 2020, 20(15): 20-23.
[10] 吴赟, 何敏. 《三体》在美国的译介之旅: 语境、主体与策略[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2019, 42(1): 94-102.
[11] 邱修宁. 离散译者刘宇昆的科幻小说译介研究——布迪厄社会学视角[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2020.
[12] 宋佳睿. 刘宇昆译科幻小说在英语世界的译介[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2020.
[13] 乔娇. 刘宇昆译中国科幻小说的跨文化传播研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连外国语大学, 2022.
[14] 汪文雅. 论刘宇昆科幻小说中“两种文化”的共生性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2023.
[15] 王思迈. 基于语料库的刘宇昆译者“指纹”及成因考察[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2025.
[16] Junker, N. (2019) Chinese Science Fiction Literature: Can It Do for China What K-Pop and Manga Do for Korea and Japan? Asia in Focus, 7, 24-33.
[17] Peyton, W. (2017) Review of Invisible Planets: Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction in Translation (trans. Ken Liu). AALITRA Review, 12, 45‑47.
https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/publications/review-of-invisible-planets-contemporary-chinese-science-fiction-/
[18] Fan, Y.L. (2021) The Possibilities and “Impossibilities” of Studying Chinese and Latin American Science Fiction. SFRA Review, 51, 124-126.
[19] Wang, A.Q. (2021) Taoist Philosophy in Chinese Science Fiction: A Comparison between Zhuangzi and Broken Stars. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 11, 237-251.
https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.11.2.2021.237-251
[20] Welin, E.M. (2023) Conflicting Times: Multiple Temporalities in Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction. Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala University.
[21] Huang, T. (2025) Worldling Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction: Patronage, Translation, and Reception. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hong Kong.
[22] Lu, J.X. (2025) On the Translators Habitus of Ken Liu Based on Sociological Perspective: With a Case Study on the Three-Body Problem. Advances in Humanities Research, 12, 152-157.
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2025.30781
[23] Wei, D.D. (2025) The Translator’s Subjectivity in Ken Liu’s Translation of Chinese Science Fiction: A Case Study of Invisible Planets. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 9, 8328-8338.
https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i06.1899
[24] Zhou, P.D. and Cheng, J.J. (2025) Stylistic Variation across English Translations of Chinese Science Fiction: Ken Liu versus ChatGPT. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1576750.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1576750
[25] Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[26] Jauss, H.R. (1982) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press.
[27] Suvin, D. (1979) Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Yale University Press.
[28] 杨枫. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021(5): 2, 27.
[29] 张生祥. 知识翻译学的理论建构与学科定位[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2022(4): 567-578.
[30] Hao, J.F. (2015) Folding Beijing. In: Liu, K., Ed., Invisible Planets: Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction in Translation, Tor Books, 103-154.
[31] Venuti, L. (1995) The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. Routledge.