低龄老人社区应急志愿服务意愿的类型划分与提升策略研究
Research on the Typical Classification and Enhancement Strategies of Younger Elderly People’s Willingness to Participate in Community Emergency Volunteer Services
摘要: 在积极老龄化与基层应急治理需求不断提升的背景下,低龄老人作为社区中具有时间资源、生活经验和在地优势的重要群体,其参与应急志愿服务对于释放老年人社会价值、补充基层应急力量具有重要意义。本文以低龄老人参与社区应急志愿服务意愿为研究对象,借鉴公民参与阶梯理论,从治理嵌入程度和服务承担程度两个维度出发,对低龄老人参与意愿进行类型划分,并进一步探讨不同类型意愿的提升策略。研究认为,低龄老人社区应急志愿服务意愿并非简单的“愿意”或“不愿意”,而是按照由浅入深的参与层次划分为关注型意愿、表达型意愿、协作型意愿和共治型意愿。基于不同意愿类型,本研究提出激发关注型意愿、培育表达型意愿、转化协作型意愿和深化共治型意愿的分类提升策略,以推动低龄老人形成应急志愿服务意愿,并进一步嵌入社区应急治理中。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of active aging and the continuously increasing demand for grassroots emergency governance, younger elderly individuals, as a crucial group in the community possessing time resources, life experience, and local advantages, play a significant role in unleashing the social value of the elderly and supplementing grassroots emergency response forces through their participation in emergency volunteer services. This paper focuses on the willingness of younger elderly individuals to participate in community emergency volunteer services. Drawing from the ladder theory of civic participation, it categorizes the willingness of younger elderly individuals to participate based on two dimensions: the degree of governance embedding and the degree of service commitment. Furthermore, it delves into strategies to enhance different types of willingness. The study suggests that the willingness of younger elderly individuals to participate in community emergency volunteer services is not a simple “yes” or “no”, but is divided into four types based on a progression from shallow to deep levels of participation: attention-seeking willingness, expressive willingness, collaborative willingness, and co-governance willingness. Based on these different types of willingness, this study proposes categorized enhancement strategies to stimulate attention-seeking willingness, cultivate expressive willingness, transform collaborative willingness, and deepen co-governance willingness. These strategies aim to promote the formation of emergency volunteer service willingness among younger elderly individuals and further embed them into community emergency governance.
文章引用:张锦蕾. 低龄老人社区应急志愿服务意愿的类型划分与提升策略研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 740-747. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138616

参考文献

[1] 关于支持老年人社会参与 推动实现老有所为的指导意见[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202505/content_7025060.htm, 2025-12-30.
[2] 刘凯强, 范和生. 莫道桑榆晚: 低龄银发消费的群像分类与发展审视[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2024(4): 92-101.
[3] 曾凡军, 蒙清璇. 城市社区应急志愿服务供给模式的碎片化困境及治理策略——基于“资本-行动者-场域”的整体性分析框架[J]. 中国志愿服务研究, 2024, 5(3): 73-97, 206.
[4] Arnstein, S.R. (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
[5] 安德鲁∙弗洛伊∙阿克兰. 设计有效的公众参与[M]//蔡定剑. 公民参与: 欧洲的制度与经验. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 297-299.
[6] 何雪松, 侯秋宇. 城市社区的居民参与: 一个本土的阶梯模型[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(5): 33-42, 236.
[7] 曹海林, 张艳. 嵌入式治理: 老旧小区环境治理的现实困境与路径探索[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 39(4): 92-100.
[8] 何继新, 刘怡辰. 低龄老年人参与基层治理共同体建设的逻辑与模式——基于“内发效能-外源嵌入”的类型分析[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2025, 27(1): 75-84.
[9] 董新宇, 杨立波, 齐璞. 环境决策中政府行为对公众参与的影响研究——基于西安市的实证分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2018, 15(1): 33-45, 155.
[10] 苏娜. 基层社会矛盾治理中公众有效参与的生成逻辑与效能提升——基于SOR-MOA理论整合框架的实证分析[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(4): 121-132.
[11] 孔凡义, 徐悦鑫. 链式动员: 社区志愿服务常态化动员机制研究[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2026(1): 64-73.
[12] 何得桂, 孙欢欣. 人口老龄化对基层社会治理的影响及对策研究[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2026, 14(2): 1-12.
[13] 杜鹏, 王飞. 新时代老年社会参与的高质量发展——内涵、现状与路径[J]. 人口与经济, 2025(5): 1-13.
[14] 许宝君. 社区志愿服务常态化及其逻辑——基于L区的案例分析[J]. 探索, 2024(3): 111-126.