《民法典》下老年人居住权执行困境与司法保障路径研究
Research on the Enforcement Challenges and Judicial Protection Pathways for Elderly Persons’ Right of Residence under the Civil Code
摘要: 随着我国社会老龄化程度的不断加深,老年人的居住权益保障成为亟待解决的重要社会问题。《中华人民共和国民法典》设立居住权制度,为老年人权益保护提供了重要的法律依据,具有里程碑式的意义。然而,在司法实践中,老年人居住权执行面临诸多困境,严重影响了这一权利的实现。本论文采用规范分析、案例实证和比较研究等方法,深入探讨老年人居住权相关问题。研究发现,当前法律规范存在模糊性,居住权登记存在障碍、执行标的具有特殊性,配套机制缺失,同时传统观念与家庭伦理也构成隐性阻碍。通过对大陆法系和英美法系国家相关制度和实践的分析,总结出立法细化、执行柔性化和社会协同等经验。最终从完善法律规范、构建专业化执行机制、强化配套措施与社会协同等层面,提出构建保障老年人居住权的全链条保护体系,旨在实现法律公平与实质正义的统一,为老龄化社会的居住权保障提供可持续方案。
Abstract: As China’s aging population deepens, ensuring the housing rights of the elderly has become a pressing social issue. The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China establishes a right of residence system, providing important legal grounds for protecting the rights and interests of the elderly, marking a milestone in this regard. However, in judicial practice, enforcement of the elderly’s right of habitation faces numerous challenges that significantly hinder its realization. This paper employs normative analysis, case-based empirical research, and comparative studies to thoroughly examine issues related to the elderly’s right of habitation. Findings indicate that current legal provisions are ambiguous, registration of the right of habitation is obstructed, the subject matter of enforcement is unique, supporting mechanisms are lacking, and traditional values and family ethics also pose implicit barriers. By analyzing relevant systems and practices in civil law and common law jurisdictions, the study identifies valuable experiences such as legislative refinement, flexible enforcement, and social collaboration. Ultimately, it proposes building a comprehensive protection system for the elderly’s right of habitation through improving legal frameworks, establishing specialized enforcement mechanisms, strengthening supporting measures, and enhancing social coordination, aiming to achieve unity between legal fairness and substantive justice, and offering a sustainable solution for housing rights protection in an aging society.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
万方. 居住权的双重立法目标及其问题[J]. 北京社会科学, 2024(12): 25-34.
|
|
[2]
|
陆璋, 张琼, 胡曼晴. 浅议居住权的适用范围及权利冲突裁判思路[N]. 人民法院报, 2021-03-18(005).
|
|
[3]
|
姚宇. 居住权效力的体系化冲突与协调[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(6): 168-182.
|
|
[4]
|
李永军. 论居住权在民法典中的体系定位[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(1): 63-75.
|
|
[5]
|
封子路. 婚姻关系下居住权的裁判设立[J]. 求索, 2023(6): 145-153.
|
|
[6]
|
骆小春, 王维茗. 从对峙到共存: 执行程序中居住权的保护范围及措施[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 25(6): 42-55.
|
|
[7]
|
林洋, 唐万钰. 我国居住权制度的解构模式及其规则重释[J]. 学术探索, 2021(7): 98-112.
|