天高线B段复线管道积液特性分析
Analysis of Liquid Accumulation Characteristics in Tian’gao Line Section B Double Pipeline
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.483046, PDF,   
作者: 徐艳丽, 何志强, 谭 建, 朱英杰, 沈 群, 谭凯烊:中国石油西南油气田公司重庆气矿,重庆;何亭玥:墨尔本大学工程与信息技术学院,澳大利亚 维多利亚州;罗媛媛*:中国人民解放军联勤保障部队工程大学,重庆;沈 喆:重庆科技大学石油与天然气工程学院,重庆
关键词: 管道积液分布规律临界携液速度Pipeline Liquid Accumulation Distribution Law Critical Liquid-Carrying Velocity
摘要: 针对天高线B段复线起伏管段的积液问题,本文基于管道实际运行参数,耦合Hysys相态分析与OLGA双流体多相流机制,建立了高精度的管道工艺及流动计算模型(平均计算偏差为1.26%)。基于该模型,系统研究了管线积液的分布特征及关键运行参数的影响规律。结果表明:当前工况下,管线积液受地形主导,主要富集于19处低洼管段(总积液量约3 m3),其中T15处(距起点14,185 m)为最大积液风险点(0.945 m3);积液量随气体流量、环境温度及出口压力的升高而减少,随入口温度及乙二醇注入量的升高而增加,但参数波动不改变积液的核心分布位置。分析认为,上述规律主要受控于温压条件改变引起的气液相平衡偏移,以及气相流速变化带来的携液剪切力差异。为进一步指导现场排液,本文结合临界携液流速分析,确定了当前工况下的临界携液界限(4.94 m/s),并构建了拟合度高达0.99的积液预测模型。本研究阐明了该天然气管道内积液的形成与分布机制,可为管道积液的动态预测与清管作业参数优化提供理论支撑。
Abstract: Aiming at the liquid accumulation problem in the undulating sections of the Tian-Gao Line Section B looping pipeline, a high-fidelity process and flow model was established based on actual field parameters. By coupling HYSYS phase behavior analysis with the OLGA two-fluid multiphase flow mechanistic model, the computational reliability was verified with an average deviation of 1.26%. Utilizing this model, the distribution characteristics of liquid accumulation and the influence of key operating parameters were systematically investigated. The results indicate that under the current operating conditions, liquid holdup is predominantly governed by topography, concentrating at 19 low-lying sections with a total volume of approximately 3 m3. Notably, location T15 (14,185 m from the inlet) exhibits the highest accumulation risk, reaching 0.945 m3. Furthermore, the liquid accumulation volume is found to decrease with increasing gas flow rate, ambient temperature, and outlet pressure, whereas it increases with elevated inlet temperature and ethylene glycol injection rates. Importantly, these parameter fluctuations do not alter the core topographical distribution of the accumulated liquid. Mechanistic analysis reveals that these phenomena are primarily driven by shifts in vapor-liquid phase equilibrium induced by temperature and pressure variations, alongside differences in the interfacial shear stress dictating the gas phase’s liquid-carrying capacity. To provide actionable guidance for on-site liquid unloading, a critical liquid-carrying gas velocity threshold of 4.94 m/s was determined for the current conditions, and a highly accurate predictive model for liquid accumulation was developed (R² = 0.99). This study elucidates the formation and distribution mechanisms of liquid holdup in natural gas pipelines, providing a robust theoretical foundation for the dynamic prediction of liquid accumulation and the optimization of pigging operations.
文章引用:徐艳丽, 何亭玥, 何志强, 谭建, 朱英杰, 沈群, 谭凯烊, 罗媛媛, 沈喆. 天高线B段复线管道积液特性分析[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(3): 420-431. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.483046

参考文献

[1] 李先兵, 康宁, 王晓冬, 等. 天然气管道积液预测技术研究与应用[J]. 石油化工应用, 2022, 41(12): 74-77.
[2] 刘建武, 何利民. 湿天然气管道积液处理方案设计与分析[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2020, 33(2): 89-93.
[3] 刘子翼. 天然气凝析液管道积液特性研究[J]. 能源化工, 2023, 44(5): 60-63.
[4] Eaton, B.A., Knowles, C.R. and Silberbrg, I.H. (1967) The Prediction of Flow Patterns, Liquid Holdup and Pressure Losses Occurring during Continuous Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipelines. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 19, 815-828.
https://doi.org/10.2118/1525-pa
[5] Turner, H.D., Hubbard, M.G. and Dukler, A.E. (1969) Prediction of Flow Rates for the Continuous Removal of Liquids from Gas Wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21, 1425-1436.
[6] Taitel, Y. and Dukler, A.E. (1976) A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transitions in Horizontal and near Horizontal Gas‐Liquid Flow. AIChE Journal, 22, 47-55.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220105
[7] Barnea, D. (1987) A Unified Model for Predicting Flow-Pattern Transitions for the Whole Range of Pipe Inclinations. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 13, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(87)90002-4
[8] Kokal, S.L. and Stanislav, J.F. (1989) An Experimental Study of Two-Phase Flow in Slightly Inclined Pipes—I. Flow Patterns. Chemical Engineering Science, 44, 665-679.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85042-0
[9] Al-Safran, E., Sarica, C., Zhang, H. and Brill, J. (2005) Investigation of Slug Flow Characteristics in the Valley of a Hilly-Terrain Pipeline. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 31, 337-357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.11.002
[10] Bendlksen, K.H., Malnes, D., Moe, R. and Nuland, S. (1991) The Dynamic Two-Fluid Model OLGA: Theory and Application. SPE Production Engineering, 6, 171-180.
https://doi.org/10.2118/19451-pa
[11] 孙乐园. 地形起伏湿气管道积液与清管数值模拟[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2021.
[12] 张皓峤. 某气田湿气集输管网积液分布及清管研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.
[13] 刘刚, 胡占州, 刘京, 等. S煤层气田集输管道积液影响因素研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2024, 43(11): 10-17.
[14] 张学聪. 连续起伏天然气管道携液特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2022.
[15] 沈伟伟, 邓道明, 刘乔平, 等. 天然气管道积液临界气速预测模型研究进展[J]. 油气储运, 2020, 39(10): 1109-1115.
[16] 秦虹, 赵紫汐, 姚佳杉, 等. 集输管道临界携液流速计算模型研究[J]. 石油工程建设, 2024, 50(1): 31-37.
[17] 梁裕如, 何鹏, 胡耀强, 等. 延安气田多起伏地面管道临界携液流速计算模型[J]. 油气储运, 2023, 42(4): 438-446.
[18] 罗程程, 李楠, 刘永辉, 等. 气井携液临界气流速计算新模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 47(4): 146-154.
[19] 马俊杰, 熊好羽, 马国光, 等. 煤层气集输管道持液率影响因素及排液点优选[J]. 天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2020, 45(1): 66-71.
[20] 李成敏. 普光气田集输系统积液预测与防控技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 东营: 中国石油大学(华东), 2021.
[21] 邢鹏. 地形起伏湿气管道积液及天然气携液研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2020.
[22] 潘杰, 蒲雪雷, 王武杰, 等. 微倾管中低含液率气液分层流临界携液流速预测模型[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(12): 124-133.
[23] Yin, P., Cao, X., Li, Y., Yang, W. and Bian, J. (2018) Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Slug Initiation and Initial Development Behavior in Hilly-Terrain Pipeline at a Low Superficial Liquid Velocity. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 101, 85-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.01.004
[24] Fan, Y., Pereyra, E. and Sarica, C. (2018) Onset of Liquid-Film Reversal in Upward-Inclined Pipes. SPE Journal, 23, 1630-1647.
https://doi.org/10.2118/191120-pa
[25] Bissor, E.H., Yurishchev, A., Ullmann, A. and Brauner, N. (2020) Prediction of the Critical Gas Flow Rate for Avoiding Liquid Accumulation in Natural Gas Pipelines. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 130, Article ID: 103361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103361
[26] Hong, B.Y., Liu, S.N., Li, X.P., et al. (2022) A Liquid Loading Prediction Method of Gas Pipeline Based on Machine Learning. Petroleum Science, 19, 3004-3015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.05.002
[27] 江鸣. 天然气凝析液管道携液特性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 东营: 中国石油大学(华东), 2018.
[28] 戚恒慎. 凝析天然气管内积液特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2020.
[29] 周良胜. 复杂地表条件下天然气集输管线积液规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学, 2009.
[30] Liu, H., Chen, J., Tao, J., Li, N., Duan, J. and Chen, Y. (2024) Gas-Liquid Hydrodynamics during Liquid Displacement by Gas in Up-Hill Pipeline. Processes, 12, Article No. 394.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020394
[31] Karami, H., Pereyra, E. and Sarica, C. (2017) Effects of Monoethylene Glycol (MEG) on Three-Phase Flow Characteristics in Near-Horizontal Pipes. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 149, 834-843.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.010