债务结构下商业信用对企业长期价值的影响
The Impact of Trade Credit on Long-Term Corporate Value from the Perspective of Debt Structure
DOI: 10.12677/fin.2026.165053, PDF,   
作者: 蔡润昕:云南民族大学经济与管理学院(会计学院),云南 昆明
关键词: 商业信用债务结构企业长期价值经营效率内部控制Trade Credit Debt Structure Long-Term Corporate Value Operational Efficiency Internal Control
摘要: 供应链协同与融资结构优化日益受到关注,商业信用作为内生于供应链交易的融资安排,其对企业长期价值的影响尚未得到充分验证。本文以A股上市公司为样本,识别商业信用占比相对于银行借款对企业长期价值的影响及其作用机制。研究发现,商业信用占比的提升显著促进了企业长期价值增长。就传导机制而言,商业信用对长期价值的贡献主要经由经营效率的提升和内部控制质量的改善来实现。分组回归的结果表明,这一正向关联在非国有样本和规模较大的样本中表现更强。本文从债务构成不同的视角出发,比较了商业信用与银行借款在长期价值上的差异,既拓展了商业信用经济后果的既有认识,也为企业调整融资结构提供了可供参考的经验证据。
Abstract: Supply chain coordination and financing structure optimization have drawn increasing attention, but the long-term value effect of trade credit, as a financing arrangement inherent in supply chain transactions, has not been fully verified. Using a sample of A-share listed companies, this paper identifies the impact of the proportion of trade credit relative to bank loans on corporate long-term value and its underlying mechanisms. The findings show that an increase in the proportion of trade credit significantly promotes long-term corporate value growth. Regarding the transmission channels, trade credit contributes to long-term value mainly through improved operational efficiency and enhanced internal control quality. Subgroup regression results indicate that this positive association is stronger in non-state-owned enterprises and larger firms. From the perspective of debt composition heterogeneity, this paper compares the long-term value differences between trade credit and bank loans, thereby extending existing knowledge of the economic consequences of trade credit and providing empirical evidence for firms to adjust their financing structures.
文章引用:蔡润昕. 债务结构下商业信用对企业长期价值的影响[J]. 金融, 2026, 16(5): 537-547. https://doi.org/10.12677/fin.2026.165053

参考文献

[1] Petersen, M.A. and Rajan, R.G. (1997) Trade Credit: Theories and Evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 10, 661-691.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.3.661
[2] Biais, B. and Gollier, C. (1997) Trade Credit and Credit Rationing. Review of Financial Studies, 10, 903-937.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.903
[3] 陆正飞, 杨德明. 商业信用: 替代性融资, 还是买方市场? [J]. 管理世界, 2011(4): 6-14+45.
[4] 郭晔, 姚若琪. 供应链关联与中小企业融资——基于供应链金融与商业信用视角[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2024, 24(4): 1173-1190.
[5] Fabbri, D. and Menichini, A.M.C. (2010) Trade Credit, Collateral Liquidation, and Borrowing Constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 96, 413-432.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.010
[6] 宋华, 卢强. 什么样的中小企业能够从供应链金融中获益?——基于网络和能力的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 104-121.
[7] 王豪杰, 刘仁芳. 债务融资的金融化治理效应研究——基于商业信用和银行借款的对比视角[J]. 会计之友, 2025(16): 111-120.
[8] Burkart, M. and Ellingsen, T. (2004) In-Kind Finance: A Theory of Trade Credit. American Economic Review, 94, 569-590.
https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464579
[9] 苏志强, 杜云晗. 商业信用、融资约束与公司价值[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2015, 36(4): 28-32.
[10] Chang, X. and Tian, B. (2025) Signaling Effects of Trade Credit Contracts in a Dual-Financing Framework. Finance Research Letters, 86, Article 108242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108242
[11] 胡悦, 吴文锋. 商业信用融资和我国企业债务的结构性问题[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(1): 257-280.
[12] 王贞洁, 姜智鑫, 杨亿. 国有企业经理人强监管与商业信用风险治理——基于供应链下游账款回收的研究视角[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-36.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20260602.1111.007, 2026-06-02.
[13] 李志红. 数字化转型对提升企业价值的影响与传导路径研究[J]. 经济问题, 2023(11): 25-32.
[14] 张宗新, 张园园, 叶润. 新质生产力提升企业市场价值的路径解析——基于科创板的实证检验[J]. 证券市场导报, 2025(9): 3-17.
[15] 殷孟波, 吴佳其. 非上市企业的经营效率传递了负债融资能力吗[J]. 财经科学, 2020(4): 37-45.
[16] 林秋平, 王云云. 商业信用融资对企业高质量发展的影响研究——基于创新与效率视角[J]. 山东工商学院学报, 2024, 38(2): 1-15+51.
[17] Sun, Y. and Huang, X. (2025) Accounting Information Transparency and Corporate Capital Turnover: The Role of Trade Credit. Finance Research Letters, 83, Article 107693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107693
[18] Fabbri, D. and Menichini, A.M.C. (2016) The Commitment Problem of Secured Lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 120, 561-584.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.009
[19] 朱冠平, 黄志媛. 商业信用融资对我国企业高质量发展的影响[J]. 企业经济, 2022, 41(9): 27-38.
[20] 纪建悦, 周婧琳. 商业信用、创新投资与企业投资效率——基于所有制差异的经验证据[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 52(1): 84-90.
[21] Wilson, N. and Summers, B. (2002) Trade Credit Terms Offered by Small Firms: Survey Evidence and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29, 317-351.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00434
[22] 罗进辉, 苏扬. ESG绩效期望落差的供应链溢出效应——来自商业信用融资的经验证据[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 3-19.
[23] 宋丽颖, 张仁杰, 祝贵仪. 供应链透明度与企业短贷长投——基于供应商和客户信息披露视角[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024, 39(6): 73-84.
[24] 金婷婷, 白雪岩, 韩玲. 供应链金融能提高企业信息披露质量吗——基于内部激励和外部监督视角的分析[J]. 会计研究, 2025(6): 47-59.
[25] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[26] Giannetti, M., Burkart, M. and Ellingsen, T. (2008) What You Sell Is What You Lend? Explaining Trade Credit Contracts. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 1261-1298.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn096
[27] Zou, X. and Zhou, L. (2025) Trade Credit and Sustainable Profitability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04840-w