多属性决策方法在管理学课程教学成绩评定中的应用
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Evaluating Teaching Performance in Management Courses
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1691884, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张家伟, 刘 芳, 王凤莲, 汤 婷:安徽工程大学经济与管理学院,安徽 芜湖;杜亚楠*:安徽应用技术职业大学文化与法律学院,安徽 芜湖;林先伟:江苏科技大学经济与管理学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 管理学课程;教学成绩;多属性决策;模糊偏好关系;集结算子;Management Course; Academic Performance; Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making; Fuzzy Preference Relations; Aggregation Operators
摘要: 为解决管理学课程教学成绩评定中单一评价维度难以反映学生综合能力的问题,本文提出并比较了基于多属性决策的两种成绩评定方法。首先,利用决策者给出的模糊偏好关系确定各评价属性的权重;其次,采用百分制对每位学生在各属性下的表现进行评分,并据此构建决策矩阵;然后,分别运用加权算术平均算子和有序加权平均算子对各属性的评价值进行集结,得到学生的综合评价值,并系统比较两种算子对评价结果的影响。最后,以安徽工程大学管理学课程的教学成绩评定为例,验证了方法的有效性与可行性,并结合形成性评价理论,探讨了该方法在教学诊断与反馈中的实践价值。
Abstract: To address the issue that a single evaluation dimension fails to reflect students’ comprehensive abilities in management course performance assessment, this paper proposes and compares two multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approaches. Attribute weights are first determined from fuzzy preference relations provided by decision-makers. Student performance on each attribute is then scored on a 100-point scale to construct a decision matrix, which is subsequently aggregated using both the Weighted Arithmetic Average operator and the Ordered Weighted Average operator respectively. The effects of different aggregation operators on ranking results are systematically compared. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed methods are demonstrated through a case study of the management course at Anhui Polytechnic University. Furthermore, combined with formative assessment theory, the practical value of this method in teaching diagnosis and feedback is discussed.
文章引用:张家伟, 刘芳, 王凤莲, 汤婷, 杜亚楠, 林先伟. 多属性决策方法在管理学课程教学成绩评定中的应用[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 119-125. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1691884

参考文献

[1] Liu, Y.Z., Yang, X., Zhu, Y., et al. (2025) Attribution-Driven Teaching Interventions: Linking I-AHP Weighted Assessment to Explainable Student Clustering. Algorithms, 18, Article 691.
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110691
[2] 赵德成. 教学中的形成性评价: 是什么及如何推进[J]. 教育科学研究, 2013(3): 47-51.
[3] 王烁, 宗序连. 形成性评价的理论内涵与实践反思[J]. 教学与管理, 2020(5): 1-4.
[4] Wang, X. and Tang, H. (2026) An Enhanced Uncertain Framework for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making: Application to Comprehensive Practical Teaching Quality Evaluation in Marketing Majors. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 18, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdsst.402019
[5] Wang, H. and Wang, J. (2026) Evaluating Teaching Quality of Vocal Music Courses in University: A Neutrosophic Exponential TODIM Group Decision-Making Approach. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics, 21, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhisi.408721
[6] Yao, J. and Xie, B. (2024) Decision-Making Technique for College Physical Education Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on TODIM and TOPSIS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 16, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdsst.364845
[7] 胡礼梅, 胡月英. 基于模糊多属性群决策理论的课堂教学质量评价研究[J]. 物流科技, 2024, 47(3): 164-167.
[8] 李晖, 苏晓东, 张玉茹, 等. 新质生产力背景下基于要素分解的研究生核心竞争力模糊多属性群决策——以信息与通信工程专业为例[J]. 西部素质教育, 2026, 12(7): 27-31.
[9] 尹芳. 基于多层次模糊综合评价的旅游管理课程教学质量评估[J]. 黄河水利职业技术学院学报, 2017, 29(1): 85-87.
[10] 姜乐, 刘红彬. 混合多属性决策方法在双语教学成绩评定中的应用[J]. 河南工程学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 28(4): 74-78.
[11] 武兆斌, 陈黎, 赵春霞. 基于灰色聚类和层次分析的模拟训练成绩评定[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(4): 416-423.
[12] 蒋远, 杨艾军, 郭渊, 等. 基于动态随机多属性决策的军事训练成绩评估[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2022, 42(7): 137-141.
[13] Tanino, T. (1984) Fuzzy Preference Orderings in Group Decision Making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12, 117-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
[14] Xu, Y.J., Da, Q.L. and Liu, L.H. (2009) Normalizing Rank Aggregation Method for Priority of a Fuzzy Preference Relation and Its Effectiveness. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50, 1287-1297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.008
[15] Xu, Z.S. and Da, Q.L. (2003) An Overview of Operators for Aggregating Information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 18, 953-969.
https://doi.org/10.1002/int.10127