幼儿园主题审议:现状、问题及对策分析
Kindergarten Theme Deliberation: Current Status, Problems, and Countermeasures
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1691888, PDF,   
作者: 蒋舒颖:福建师范大学教育学院,福建 福州
关键词: 主题活动;主题审议;课程审议;Thematic Activities; Theme Deliberation; Curriculum Deliberation
摘要: 幼儿园主题审议是优化主题活动课程设计的关键环节,对提升课程适宜性和科学性具有重要作用。本文从主题活动审议的实施现状入手,分析当前在主题审议的流程、主题审议的主体与主题审议的内容方面存在理想模式与现实差距。因此本文从营造审议氛围、优化审议机制、融入儿童视角、提升教师素养四方面提出提升策略,以促进主题活动质量的持续改进,最终让主题活动更能贴近幼儿生活,促进幼儿在认知、情感、社会性等方面的全面发展。
Abstract: Kindergarten theme deliberation is a crucial link in optimizing the curriculum design of thematic activities and plays a significant role in enhancing curriculum appropriateness and scientificity. Starting from the current implementation status of theme deliberation, this paper analyzes the gap between the ideal model and reality in terms of its process, participants, and content. Therefore, this paper proposes improvement strategies from four aspects: fostering a deliberative atmosphere, optimizing deliberation mechanisms, integrating children’s perspectives, and enhancing teachers’ competence. These strategies aim to promote the continuous improvement of the quality of thematic activities, ultimately making them more aligned with children’s daily lives and fostering their holistic development in cognition, emotion, and social skills.
文章引用:蒋舒颖. 幼儿园主题审议:现状、问题及对策分析[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1691888

参考文献

[1] 张华. 课程与教学论[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000: 21.
[2] 虞永平. 论幼儿园课程审议[J]. 学前教育研究, 2005(1): 11-13.
[3] 王春燕. 幼儿园课程审议: 缘起、发展与审思[J]. 幼儿教育, 2020(13): 13-15.
[4] 虞永平, 曾福秀. D∙诺伊的课程审议模式及其对幼儿园课程开发的启示[J]. 早期教育, 2004(8): 6-7.
[5] 虞永平. 学前课程与幸福童年[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2012: 210.
[6] 虞永平. 再论幼儿园课程审议[M]. 幼儿教育, 2008(11): 4-6.
[7] 夏萍萍. 从“检核”到“鹰架”: 以课程审议引领主题活动实施[J]. 幼儿教育, 2023(2): 24-27.
[8] 赵红霞, 杨丽娟, 张梓逸, 等. 幼儿园主题活动审议的现实困境及对策[J]. 连云港师范高等专科学校学报, 2024, 41(3): 87-90.
[9] 洪晔, 陆丽华. 幼儿园主题审议的现状、问题与对策[J]. 东方娃娃∙绘本与教育, 2024(12): 57-59.
[10] 李俊俊. 回归儿童视角的“课程审议”——以班本主题“垃圾分类”为例[J]. 山东教育, 2020(12): 4-6.
[11] 陈仙红. 回归儿童视角的主题审议——以大班主题活动“我们毕业了”为例[J]. 福建教育, 2019(50): 36-38.
[12] Eisner, E.W. (1975) Curriculum Development in Stanford University’s Kettering Project: Recollections and Ruminations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 7, 26-41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027750070104
[13] Fox, S. (1972) A Practical Image of “the Practical”. Curriculum Theory Network, No. 10, 45-57.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1179217
[14] 吴洁. 姚沈琴. 双线三议: 优化幼儿园课程审议之研究[J]. 早期教育, 2020(1): 25-27.
[15] 张晗. 幼儿园课程质量的保证: 基于经验本质的幼儿园课程审议[J]. 基础教育课程, 2020(10): 76-80.