重症超声在脓毒性休克液体复苏治疗中的研究进展
Research Progress of Severe Ultrasound in the Treatment of Septic Shock Fluid Resuscitation
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1693078, PDF,   
作者: 黄德宽:右江民族医学院研究生学院,广西 百色;李 军*:右江民族医学院附属医院重症医学科,广西 百色
关键词: 脓毒性休克;重症超声;液体复苏;容量反应性;下腔静脉;心功能评估;Septic Shock; Severe Ultrasound; Fluid Resuscitation; Volume Responsiveness; Inferior Vena Cava; Cardiac Function Evaluation
摘要: 脓毒性休克(septic shock)是重症监护病房常见的一种急危重症,在对患者进行救治时,液体复苏是治疗的核心环节。但传统的基于静态参数的液体复苏策略常不能正确评价患者的容量状态和反应性,容易造成复苏不足或者容量过负荷的情况发生。而重症超声是一种无创且动态的床旁评估手段,可通过对心脏功能、下腔静脉变异度以及肺水的情况来反应对脓毒性休克患者的精细化液体管理。本文就目前重症超声应用在脓毒性休克液体复苏治疗的研究进展进行了综述,着重讨论了重症超声用于评估容量反应性和监测器官灌注、指导液体管理和避免容量过负荷等方面的临床意义并总结了现有研究情况,旨在为临床工作提供借鉴。
Abstract: Septic shock is a common acute and severe disease in intensive care unit. In the treatment of patients, fluid resuscitation is the most important part. Traditional fluid resuscitation strategies based on static parameters often fail to correctly evaluate the patient’s volume status and responsiveness, which is likely to cause insufficient resuscitation or volume overload. Severe ultrasound is a non-invasive and dynamic bedside evaluation method, which can achieve a new idea of precise fluid management for patients with septic shock through cardiac function, inferior vena cava variability and lung water status. This article reviews the research progress of severe ultrasound in the treatment of septic shock fluid resuscitation. The clinical significance of critical ultrasound in evaluating volume responsiveness, monitoring organ perfusion, guiding fluid management and avoiding volume overload was discussed, and the existing research situation was summarized in order to provide reference for clinical work.
文章引用:黄德宽, 李军. 重症超声在脓毒性休克液体复苏治疗中的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(9): 550-558. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1693078

参考文献

[1] Shapiro, N.I., Douglas, I.S., Brower, R.G., et al. (2023) Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. New England Journal of Medicine, 388, 499-510.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2212663
[2] Gelbenegger, G., Shapiro, N.I., Zeitlinger, M., Jilma, B., Douglas, I.S. and Jorda, A. (2025) Lactated Ringer’s or Normal Saline for Initial Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. Critical Care Medicine, 53, e1140-e1144.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006601
[3] 胡漫林, 陈彩铅, 袁海浪. 重症超声指导脓毒性休克液体管理的临床效果分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2021, 25(1): 84-85.
[4] 余琨. 重症超声引导的早期液体复苏在脓毒性休克中的临床应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 遵义: 遵义医科大学, 2020.
[5] 蔡潮深, 刘超帆, 丁广前. 重症超声在脓毒性休克患者早期液体复苏治疗中的应用价值分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2020, 14(15): 108-110.
[6] Douglas, I.S., Alapat, P.M., Corl, K.A., Exline, M.C., Forni, L.G., Holder, A.L., et al. (2020) Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Chest, 158, 1431-1445.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.025
[7] 李刚, 魏冯宁, 张国强, 等. 被动抬腿试验联合经胸超声心动图指导脓毒性休克患者早期液体复苏的临床意义[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2019, 31(4): 413-417.
[8] Muller, L., Bobbia, X., Toumi, M., Louart, G., Molinari, N., Ragonnet, B., et al. (2012) Respiratory Variations of Inferior Vena Cava Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure: Need for a Cautious Use. Critical Care, 16, R188.
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11672
[9] 张宏民, 刘大为, 王小亭, 等. 下腔静脉内径变异度判断房颤患者容量反应性的意义[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(19): 1453-1456.
[10] Memon, A., Ansari, M.I., Shaikh, S.A., et al. (2021) Fluid Resuscitation in Cardiogenic Shock: An Assessment of Responsiveness and Outcome. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, 33, 471-474.
[11] 王宁, 宋伟, 王岩, 等. 动脉血流峰值流速变异度评价危重症患者容量反应状态的Meta分析[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2020, 22(4): 270-274.
[12] 亢春苗, 牛丹, 穆靓, 等. 迷你容量负荷试验联合床旁超声心动图快速评估重症机械通气患者容量反应性[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2021, 43(8): 824-828.
[13] Monnet, X., Marik, P.E. and Teboul, J. (2016) Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness: An Update. Annals of Intensive Care, 6, Article 111.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7
[14] 王雄雄, 吕志刚, 蔡云, 等. 颈内静脉直径呼吸变异率指导容量治疗的研究[J]. 中国现代医生, 2015, 53(1): 10-12.
[15] 王元元, 钮金英, 沈继龙, 等. 超声测定颈动静脉截面积比值评估容量反应的研究[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(12): 1393-1397.
[16] Nadaf, Z.M., Ravikumar, R.H., Anand, R.K., Ramachandran, R., Trikha, A., Wig, N., et al. (2026) Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Dysfunction in Septic Shock: An Observational Cohort Study. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 30, 56-61.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25118
[17] Torres-Arrese, M., García-Casasola, G. and Blancas, R. (2026) Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Septic Shock. Medicina Clínica, 166, Article 107269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2025.107269
[18] Fu, X., Lin, X., Seery, S., Zhao, L., Zhu, H., Xu, J., et al. (2022) Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography for Detecting Myocardial Dysfunction in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Single Emergency Department Study. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13, 175-181.
https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.057
[19] 李合强, 徐艳萍, 张小亚, 等. 基于床旁超声的脓毒性右心功能障碍预后评估及危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2025, 37(7): 638-643.
[20] Zhang, H., Huang, W., Zhang, Q., Chen, X., Wang, X. and Liu, D. (2021) Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Various Types of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Patients. Annals of Intensive Care, 11, Article No. 108.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00902-9
[21] Delgado-Serrano, J.F., Torres-Cordon, M., Pena-Rangel, M.A., et al. (2021) Myocardial Dysfunction and Its Prognostic Utility in Sepsis and Septic Shock. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 59, 300-305.
[22] 尹万红, 李易, 秦瑶, 等. 二尖瓣舒张早期血流峰速度与瓣环运动速度比值在评价严重脓毒症肺水肿中的价值[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(4): 580-583.
[23] 陈小玲, 林小云. 床旁即时重症超声在脓毒症患者右心功能动态监测中的应用探究[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2025, 29(6): 19-22.
[24] 呼吸系统疾病床旁超声诊断与评估专家共识编委会. 呼吸系统疾病床旁超声诊断与评估专家共识(2026版) [J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2026, 46(4): 277-300.
[25] Theerawit, P., Touman, N., Sutherasan, Y. and Kiatboonsri, S. (2014) Transthoracic Ultrasound Assessment of B-Lines for Identifying the Increment of Extravascular Lung Water in Shock Patients Requiring Fluid Resuscitation. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 18, 195-199.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.130569
[26] 傅小云, 高飞, 苏德, 等. 重症患者肺超声B线评分用于血管外肺水评估的临床研究[J]. 中国急救医学, 2014, 34(7): 591-594.
[27] 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会急诊医学分会, 中华医学会急诊医学分会, 中国老年学会基础与转化医学分会. 老年急危重症容量管理急诊专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2024, 33(6): 749-760.
[28] Tayar, A.S.A., Salem, H.A., Abdelshafey, E.E., Rashwan, M.A., Khalil, M.F., Alwafi, H.A., et al. (2025) Comparative Analysis of Lung Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and X-Ray in the Diagnosis of Common Pathologies among Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients—A Prospective Observational Study. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 29, 807-814.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25061
[29] Perpenti, M., Balzani, E., Mento, F., Marinaro, C., Bellani, G., Perrone, T., et al. (2026) Quantitative Lung Ultrasound Spectroscopy: First Comparison with Gold Standard Computed Tomography Scan and Standard Lung Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pneumonia versus Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema. The Ultrasound Journal, 18, Article 18605.
https://doi.org/10.5826/tuj.2026.18605
[30] 史迪, 徐军, 朱华栋, 等. 不明原因休克急诊超声临床实践专家共识解析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2017, 37(5): 394-396.
[31] Li, L., Ai, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Ma, X., Huang, L., et al. (2021) Effect of Focused Cardiopulmonary Ultrasonography on Clinical Outcome of Septic Shock: A Randomized Study. Journal of International Medical Research, 49, 1-14.
[32] Bickell, W.H., Wall, M.J., Pepe, P.E., Martin, R.R., Ginger, V.F., Allen, M.K., et al. (1994) Immediate versus Delayed Fluid Resuscitation for Hypotensive Patients with Penetrating Torso Injuries. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 1105-1109.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199410273311701
[33] Malbrain, M.L.N.G., Martin, G. and Ostermann, M. (2022) Everything You Need to Know about Deresuscitation. Intensive Care Medicine, 48, 1781-1786.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06761-7
[34] Beaubien-Souligny, W., Rola, P., Haycock, K., Bouchard, J., Lamarche, Y., Spiegel, R., et al. (2020) Quantifying Systemic Congestion with Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Development of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System. The Ultrasound Journal, 12, Article No. 16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00163-w
[35] De Backer, D., Ricottilli, F. and Ospina-Tascón, G.A. (2021) Septic Shock: A Microcirculation Disease. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 34, 85-91.
https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000957
[36] Soliman Aboumarie, H., Nasa, P. and Malbrain, M.L.N.G. (2025) Cardiovascular Effects of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension: Current Perspectives. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 57, 340-355.
https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/210612
[37] Dell’Anna, A.M., Carelli, S., Cicetti, M., Stella, C., Bongiovanni, F., Natalini, D., et al. (2022) Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 298, Article 103844.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2022.103844
[38] Balik, M., Matousek, V., Maly, M. and Brozek, T. (2017) Management of Arrhythmia in Sepsis and Septic Shock. Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia, 49, 419-429.
https://doi.org/10.5603/ait.a2017.0061
[39] Guo, X., Tang, M., Jiang, X., Lin, J., Chen, W. and Song, Y. (2026) Ultrasound of the Inferior Vena Cava for Fluid Therapy Decisions: Strengths, Limitations, and an Integrated Approach. Journal of International Medical Research, 54.
[40] Shittu, H.A. and Quaye, P.S. (2025) AI-Assisted Handheld Echocardiography by Nonexpert Operators: A Narrative Review of Prospective Studies. Cureus, 17, e97050.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97050
[41] Airapetian, N., Maizel, J., Alyamani, O., Mahjoub, Y., Lorne, E., Levrard, M., et al. (2015) Does Inferior Vena Cava Respiratory Variability Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients? Critical Care, 19, Article No. 400.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9
[42] 黄薇, 王欣晨, 柴文昭, 等. 脓毒性休克血流氧流分型与临床管理专家共识(2025) [J]. 协和医学杂志, 2026, 17(1): 40-58.