基线/阐释理论框架下英语中动构式的句法与语义界面研究
A Study of the Syntax-Semantics Interface of English Middle Constructions from the Perspective of Baseline/Elaboration Theory
摘要: 本文在认知语法的基线/阐释理论框架下,从典型与非典型两个维度,探讨英语中动构式的句法与语义界面及其实现机制与路径。研究认为,概念化主体以动作事件为基线,通过施事隐含与性状特征调适等阐释操作,使受事或旁格论元的内在性质在动作框架中外显,形成性质触发事件;动作事件与性质触发事件经由核心论元同一性相互融合,构成完整中动事件;概念化主体将中动事件转为意象图式,通过隐喻投射到句法结构上,表征为由主语NP、动作成分以及性质成分构成的完整中动句;中动事件与其句法结构之间配对,相互作用、彼此映射,实现中动句的句法与语义界面。典型与非典型构式虽在论元配置与形式标记上呈现差异,但两者共享统一的认知生成路径。研究结果为英语中动构式的教学与习得提供了认知理据。
Abstract: Within the theoretical framework of Baseline/Elaboration Theory in Cognitive Grammar, this paper investigates the syntax-semantics interface of English middle constructions as well as their realization mechanism and paths from both prototypical and non-prototypical dimensions. It is contended that the conceptualizer first perceives and experiences an action event, which is regarded as a baseline. Through elaboration operations such as agent suppression and property adjustment, the inherent properties of the patient or oblique argument are externalized within the action frame, giving rise to the property-triggered event. The action event and the property-triggered event are then integrated into a complete middle event via the identity of core arguments. Subsequently, the conceptualizer transforms this middle event into an image schema, which is metaphorically projected onto syntactic structure, yielding a full middle sentence composed of the subject NP, the action constituent, and the property constituent. The middle event and its syntactic structure are paired, interact, and mutually map onto each other, thereby realizing the syntax-semantics interface of the middle construction. Despite their divergences in argument configuration and formal markings, prototypical and non-prototypical constructions share a unified cognitive generative pathway. These findings provide cognitive evidence for the teaching and acquisition of English middle constructions.
文章引用:张婷. 基线/阐释理论框架下英语中动构式的句法与语义界面研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(9): 94-101. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.149902

参考文献

[1] 杨佑文. 英语中动结构: 典型与非典型[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2011, 34(4): 18-23, 31, 127.
[2] 熊学亮, 付岩. 英汉中动词的及物性探究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2013, 45(1): 3-12, 159.
[3] Keyser, S.J. and Roeper, T. (1984) On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 381-416.
[4] 陈文, 曾涛, 李钰茜. 中国英语学习者中动句的句法-语义接口加工研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2024, 56(1): 88-100, 160.
[5] Fagan, S. (1992) The Semantics and Syntax of Middle Construction: A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Iwata, S. (1999) On the Status of an Implicit Arguments in Middles. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 527-553.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226799007914
[7] Stroik, T. (1992) Middles and Movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 127-137.
[8] 王和玉, 戴晖. 英语中动结构的混合式移位分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2020(5): 97-106, 150.
[9] Dai, H. and Wang, H. (2025) One Move but Two Movements: An Alternative Account of the Middle Construction. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4, Article 1480009.
https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2025.1480009
[10] 冯爽, 尹洪山. 英语中动句历史发展的内部机制及动因[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(5): 83-103.
[11] Yu, J., Ausensi, J. and Smith, R.W. (2023) States and Changes-of-State in the Semantics of Result Roots: Evidence from Resultative Constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 41, 1589-1628.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-023-09570-9
[12] Ausensi, J. and Bigolin, A. (2023) On the Argument Structure Realization of Result Verbs: A Syntactic Approach. Acta Linguistica Academica, 70, 139-160.
https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00567
[13] 吴炳章, 牛雅禾. 中动结构的概念化机制研究[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2017, 25(2): 53-57.
[14] 刘存伟. 认知语法视域下的英语中动句研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(2): 123-130.
[15] 蔡淑美, 施春宏. 中动句的形义关系、构造机制和层级系统——基于跨语言比较的视角[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2023, 46(6): 33-44.
[16] 王凤娥, 蒋向勇. 英语S-V语序构式体系内的英语中动构式探析[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 55(6): 170-176.
[17] Langacker, R.W. (2016) Baseline and Elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 405-439.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0126
[18] 庞加光, 张韧. 基线/阐释模型下的汉语离合词现象研究[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2022, 45(2): 72-83.
[19] Langacker W., R. (2015) How to Build an English Clause. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2, 1-45.
https://doi.org/10.14706/jfltal15121
[20] Langacker, R.W. (2019) Levels of Reality. Languages, 4, Article 22.
https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020022
[21] 吴吉东, 陈悦. 基线/阐释理论框架下汉英关系复句句法与语义界面研究[J]. 外语研究, 2024, 41(2): 31-36, 57.
[22] 钟书能, 黄瑞芳. 基线/阐释模型下汉语双名词构式的认知研究[J]. 现代外语, 2025, 48(5): 585-596.
[23] 唐燕玲, 陈湘琼. 基线/阐释理论框架下英汉条件构式的情态对比研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2025, 57(5): 669-681.
[24] Roberts, I.G. (1987) The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Foris Publications.
[25] Ackema, P. and Schoorlemmer, M. (2006) Middles. In: Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H., Eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Vol. I), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 131-203.