数字环境发展何以赋能企业韧性?——基于动态能力理论的机制分析和实证研究
How Does the Development of Digital Environment Empower Corporate Resilience?—Mechanism Analysis and Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Capabilities Theory
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2026.159206, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 于寄语, 邹 游:湖北经济学院金融学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 数字环境;动态能力理论;企业韧性;机制检验;Digital Environment; Dynamic Capabilities Theory; Corporate Resilience; Mechanism Testing
摘要: 本文基于“省份–企业”跨层数据构建面板回归和中介分析模型,探讨数字环境对企业韧性的影响效应和作用机制。研究发现:(1) 数字环境显著促进了企业韧性提升,且该效应具有源头治理特征:数字环境能够在一定程度缓释外部风险冲击,使企业免于“极限生存”困境。(2) 基于动态能力理论的机制研究表明,数字环境强化企业的环境感知力、提升企业的外部资源获取能力、增强企业的内部资源重组能力;并通过上述三条路径协同支撑企业韧性提升。(3) 当地区数字环境发展跨越一定阈值时,上述赋能效应会得到更充分释放。同时,相较于资本密集型行业,数字环境对于企业韧性的影响在技术密集型行业和劳动密集型行业更为凸显。本文从外部环境视角拓展了企业韧性的研究边界,为构建数字时代企业韧性支撑体系、畅通企业韧性的外部赋能机制提供了学理依据。
Abstract: Based on cross-level data of provinces and enterprises, this paper constructs panel regression and mediation analysis models to investigate the impact and mechanisms of the digital environment on corporate resilience. The main findings are as follows: (1) The digital environment significantly promotes corporate resilience, and this effect exhibits a source governance characteristic: to some extent, the digital environment mitigates external risk shocks, shielding firms from the “extreme survival” predicament. (2) Mechanism analysis grounded in dynamic capabilities theory reveals that the digital environment strengthens firms’ environmental perception capability, enhances their external resource acquisition capability, and improves their internal resource reconfiguration capability. These three pathways work synergistically to support the improvement of corporate resilience. (3) When the development of the regional digital environment surpasses a certain threshold, the aforementioned impact effects will be more fully unleashed. Meanwhile, compared with capital intensive industries, the enabling effect of the digital environment on enterprise resilience is more pronounced in technology-intensive industries and labor intensive industries. This paper expands the research boundary of corporate resilience from an external environmental perspective, providing theoretical foundations for building a corporate resilience support system in the digital era and facilitating the external empowerment mechanisms of corporate resilience.
文章引用:于寄语, 邹游. 数字环境发展何以赋能企业韧性?——基于动态能力理论的机制分析和实证研究[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(9): 57-71. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.159206

参考文献

[1] 胡海峰, 宋肖肖, 郭兴方. 投资者保护制度与企业韧性: 影响及其作用机制[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(11): 23-39.
[2] 潘为华, 罗永恒. 供应链金融与企业韧性: 基于协同创新和风险承担的视角[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2024, 45(5): 10-17.
[3] 陈琪, 李梦函. ESG评级能否提高企业韧性?——基于ESG评级事件的准自然实验[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(5): 132-145.
[4] 刘达, 王晓丹, 王淑瑶, 等. 新质生产力赋能企业韧性——基于新型生产关系与生产要素的分析框架[J]. 财经论丛, 2025(1): 15-25.
[5] 张杰, 范雨婷. 创新投入与企业韧性: 内在机制与产业链协同[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(5): 51-71.
[6] 祁怀锦, 曹修琴, 刘艳霞. 数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角[J]. 改革, 2020(4): 50-64.
[7] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144, 10.
[8] 刘胜, 徐榕鑫, 陈秀英. 数字化转型与企业风险承担——兼论我国产业链供应链“稳中求进”的启示[J]. 经济与管理, 2023, 37(3): 74-81.
[9] 蒋峦, 凌宇鹏, 张吉昌, 等. 数字化转型如何影响企业韧性?——基于双元创新视角[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(1): 1-11.
[10] 卢正文, 许康. 数字化转型对企业创新韧性的双重效应研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(7): 1046-1055.
[11] 张蔼容, 胡珑瑛. 数字化转型能促进企业韧性提升吗?——资源配置的中介作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2023, 35(5): 1-15.
[12] 苑泽明, 尹琪, 黄灿. 数据资产与企业韧性: 效应与机制[J]. 经济经纬, 2025, 42(1): 120-132.
[13] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
[14] Teece, D.J. (2007) Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[15] 王鹏, 陈蝶欣. 人工智能技术应用与企业韧性——来自机器学习构建AI词典的经验证据[J]. 经济学动态, 2025(9): 98-117.
[16] 孔德议, 许安心. 管理决断权、财务柔性与企业技术创新[J]. 证券市场导报, 2020(5): 56-63.
[17] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.