关于扎根理论研究方法的述评
Comments on Grounded Theory Research Method
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2015.53027, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 高传俊, 朱月龙：苏州大学教育学院，江苏 苏州
关键词: 扎根理论；质性研究；操作过程；Grounded Theory； Qualitative Research； Operation Process
摘要: 扎根理论被誉为自然主义研究范式下最具有科学逻辑的方法论，已被国内外越来越多的教育研究者所重视，该方法的特点是从现象中提炼理论，从而创建或丰富既有的理论体系，本文对扎根理论的概念、特征以及基本流程进行了阐释，比较了其与其他质性研究的不同，从而客观的评价其对心理学、教育学的贡献，但同时仍有许多局限性，需要研究者不断的去改进、完善。
Abstract: Grounded theory has been hailed as a naturalistic research paradigm under the methodology of scientific logic. It has attracted more and more attention from the education researchers both at home and abroad. The characteristics of the method are deriving theory from phenomenon and creating or enriching the existing theory systems. This paper introduces in detail the concept of grounded theory, characteristics, basic process and compares it with other qualitative researches, so as to objectively evaluate its contribution to the psychology, pedagogy. At the same time there are still many limitations. Researchers need to improve and perfect it continually.
文章引用：高传俊, 朱月龙 (2015). 关于扎根理论研究方法的述评. 心理学进展, 5(3), 193-197. https://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.53027

参考文献

[1] 白蓉(2014). 扎根理论在民族心理研究中的应用探讨. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1期, 023.
[2] 陈向明(1999). 扎根理论的思路和方法. 教育研究与实验, 4期, 58-63.
[3] 冯生尧, 谢瑶妮(2001). 扎根理论: 一种新颖的质化研究方法. 现代教育论丛, 6期, 51-53.
[4] 李志刚(2007). 扎根理论方法在科学研究中的运用分析. 东方论坛: 青岛大学学报, 4期, 90-94.
[5] 李志刚, 李兴旺(2006). 蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究——扎根理论研究方法的运用. 管理科学, 3期, 2-7.
[6] 孟娟(2008). 心理学扎根理论研究方法. 吉首大学学报: 社会科学版, 3期, 170-176.
[7] 齐玲, 漆昌柱(2007). 扎根理论: 心理学本土化的有效途径. 体育世界: 学术版, 2期, 65-67.
[8] 王敏顺(1995). 扎根理论研究法之评述. 规画学报, 22期.
[9] 王舒芸, 余汉仪(1995). 奶爸难为——双薪家庭之父职角色初探. 妇女与两性学刊, 8期, 115-141.
[10] 徐亚瑛(1996). 扎根理论之介绍——以台湾地区残病老人家庭照顾质量研究为例. 护理研究, 3期, 263-278.
[11] 薛晶心(2011). 扎根理论方法与高等教育研究. 大学教育科学, 6期, 85-88.
[12] 詹妮弗•埃文斯, 著, 苏彦捷, 译(2010). 心理学研究要义. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[13] 张敬伟(2010). 扎根理论研究法在管理学研究中的应用. 科技管理研究, 1期, 235-237.
[14] 张敬伟, 马东俊(2009). 扎根理论研究法与管理学研究. 现代管理科学, 2期, 115-117.
[15] Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 359-380.
[16] Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[17] Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[18] Dumas, M. J., & Anderson, G. (2014). Qualitative research as policy knowledge: framing policy problems and transforming education from the ground up. Education Policy Analysis Archives.
[19] Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 654-663
[20] Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17, 364.
[21] Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Yu, Y. (2014). An examination of CSCL methodological practices and the influence of theoretical frameworks 2005-2009. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 305-334.
[22] Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476-1484.
[24] Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
[25] Wells, K. (1995). The strategy of grounded theory: Possibilities and problems. Social Work Research, 19, 33-37.