战略性新兴产业新质人才核心素养与培养机制研究——基于活动理论的混合方法分析
Research on the Core Competencies and Cultivation Mechanisms of New-Quality Talents in Strategic Emerging Industries—A Mixed-Methods Analysis Based on Activity Theory
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1691938, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吉 峰, 丁志华, 何中伟:中国矿业大学经济管理学院,江苏 徐州;罗驱波*:中国矿业大学信息与控制工程学院,江苏 徐州
关键词: 战略性新兴产业新质人才核心素养培养机制活动理论Strategic Emerging Industries New Quality Talents Core Competencies Training Mechanism Activity Theory
摘要: 战略性新兴产业的跨界融合特征与高校传统学科分割的培养体系之间存在根本性结构错位,导致新质人才供给严重滞后于产业需求。本研究以活动理论为分析框架,采用扎根理论方法,通过对28位来自产业、高校及政策管理部门的代表进行深度访谈,系统探讨了战略性新兴产业新质人才核心素养的维度结构与培养机制。研究发现:(1) 战略性新兴产业新质人才核心素养是一个包含专业知识与技能素养、创新与整合素养、数字化与智能化素养、沟通与协作素养、国际化与战略视野、价值观与责任素养等六个维度、二十七个要素的复合结构,并呈现“基础层–支撑层–发展层–引领层”的四层递进逻辑;(2) 新质人才培养活动系统由主体、客体、中介工具、规则、共同体与分工六个要素构成,通过“目标牵引–工具中介–规则引导–分工协作–反馈调节”五重机制协同运作,形成“教育系统–产业系统”双循环的动态演化系统。本研究构建的核心素养金字塔模型与培养机制框架,为破解我国战略性新兴产业人才供需结构性矛盾提供了理论依据与实践路径。
Abstract: There is a fundamental structural misalignment between the cross-border integration characteristics of strategic emerging industries and the traditional discipline-based training system of universities, resulting in a serious lag between the supply of new-type talents and industry demand. This study uses activity theory as the analytical framework and adopts the grounded theory approach. Through in-depth interviews with 28 representatives from industry, universities and policy management departments, it systematically explores the dimensional structure and training mechanism of the core competencies of new-type talents in strategic emerging industries. The study found that: (1) The core competencies of new-type talents in strategic emerging industries is a composite structure with six dimensions and twenty-seven elements, including professional knowledge and skills, innovation and integration, digitalization and intelligence, communication and collaboration, internationalization and strategic vision, and values and responsibility. It presents a four-layer progressive logic of “foundation layer - support layer - development layer - leading layer”; (2) The new-type talent training activity system consists of six elements: subject, object, intermediary tools, rules, community and division of labor. It operates through five mechanisms of “goal-driven - tool-mediated - rule-guided - division of labor and cooperation - feedback adjustment” to form a dynamic evolutionary system of “education system - industry system” in a dual cycle. The core competency pyramid model and training mechanism framework constructed in this study provide a theoretical basis and practical path for solving the structural contradiction between supply and demand of talents in my country’s strategic emerging industries.
文章引用:吉峰, 丁志华, 何中伟, 罗驱波. 战略性新兴产业新质人才核心素养与培养机制研究——基于活动理论的混合方法分析[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 593-608. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1691938

参考文献

[1] 张建清, 张星民, 伍骏骞. 大国战略竞争下的新质人才需求: 来自大模型数据挖掘的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2025, 48(9): 117-145.
[2] 王一岩, 塔卫刚, 赵芳芳. 新质人才培养: 核心理念与实践路径[J]. 开放教育研究, 2024, 30(6): 48-54.
[3] 梁宇健. 新时代教育评价改革赋能新质人才培养: 耦合机制与实践路径[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2025, 43(8): 23-30.
[4] 余应鸿, 张翔, 王茜. 构建与新质生产力发展相适应的拔尖创新人才培养体系[J]. 中国远程教育, 2025, 45(6): 62-75.
[5] 楚肖燕. 技术加速时代新质人才培养的主体性危机诊断与纾解[J]. 教学与管理, 2025(15): 8-13.
[6] 张凤娟, 张菁. 指向新质人才培养的科学教育评价: 逻辑路向、价值取向与路径优化[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2025(5): 73-80.
[7] Karacay, G. (2017) Talent Development for Industry 4.0. In: Ustundag, A. and Cevikcan, E., Eds., Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing, 123-136.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_7
[8] Vengathattil, S. (2025) Future-Proofing AI Talent in the United States: The Role of Academia in Meeting Industry Demands. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 5, 210-217.
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v5i1.3837
[9] 孙飞, 梁高杨. 构建适应新质生产力发展的人才制度体系: 理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(12): 84-96.
[10] 于兆吉, 房一宁, 鲍卉. 教育、科技、人才“三位一体”赋能高等教育新质人才培养的逻辑、挑战与进路[J]. 现代教育管理, 2024(9): 34-44.
[11] Cutcliffe, J.R. (2000) Methodological Issues in Grounded Theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476-1484.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x
[12] European Commission (2022) DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Publications Office of the European Union.
[13] European Commission (2016) EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Publications Office of the European Union.
[14] OECD (2019) OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: The Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
[15] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020) Framework for Engineering Learning. The National Academies Press.
[16] Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B.A. (1997) Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications. CHI ‘97 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, 22-27 March 1997, 158-159.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120321