大跨地铁车站近接既有建筑非扰动施工数值模拟与工法比选
Numerical Simulation and Method Optimization of Non-Disturbance Construction for a Large-Span Metro Station Adjacent to Existing Buildings
摘要: 依托重庆轨道交通15号线金童路站暗挖工程,针对特大断面车站在既有建筑群正下方施工的扰动控制问题,基于MIDAS GTS NX建立了包含地层、既有建筑与隧道结构的三维数值模型,对盾构法与铣挖法两种非扰动开挖方案的全过程施工力学响应进行了模拟,系统对比了两种工法下围岩三向应力、关键部位主应力、塑性区分布以及拱顶、仰拱、边墙位移与既有建筑变形的差异。结果表明:两种工法下围岩应力均处于可控范围,盾构法引起的水平向与竖向围岩应力总体小于铣挖法,围岩最大竖向压应力盾构法为1.92 MPa,铣挖法为2.16 MPa;盾构法下拱顶沉降3.25 mm、仰拱隆起5.90 mm,均小于铣挖法的5.75 mm与7.97 mm;盾构法下既有建筑最大位移1.652 mm,约为铣挖法3.270 mm的一半,两种工法下建筑变形均满足控制要求。综合施工安全、工效与环境影响,盾构法为该工程最优的非扰动施工方案,研究结果可为类似近接既有建筑的大断面地下工程工法选择与施工控制提供参考。
Abstract: Relying on the mined Jintongli Road Station of Chongqing Rail Transit Line 15, a three-dimensional numerical model including strata, existing buildings and tunnel structures was established with MIDAS GTS NX to address the disturbance control problem of a super-large cross-section station constructed directly beneath existing buildings. The whole-process mechanical responses of shield tunneling and milling excavation were simulated, and the differences in surrounding rock stresses, principal stresses at key positions, plastic zones, displacements of the crown, invert and sidewall, and deformation of existing buildings were compared. The results show that the stresses of the surrounding rock are controllable under both methods. The horizontal and vertical surrounding rock stresses induced by the shield tunneling method are generally lower than those induced by the milling excavation. The maximum vertical compressive stress in the surrounding rock is 1.92 MPa for the shield method and 2.16 MPa for the milling excavation. The crown settlement under the shield method is 3.25 mm and the invert heave is 5.90 mm, both smaller than the 5.75 mm and 7.97 mm for the milling excavation, respectively. The maximum displacement of the existing building under the shield method is 1.652 mm, approximately half of the 3.270 mm under the milling excavation. The building deformation meets the control requirements under both methods. Considering construction safety, efficiency, and environmental impact, the shield tunneling method is the optimal non-disturbing construction scheme for this project. The research results can provide a reference for the selection of construction methods and construction control of similar large-section underground projects adjacent to existing buildings.
文章引用:李磊. 大跨地铁车站近接既有建筑非扰动施工数值模拟与工法比选[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(9): 40-53. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.159222

参考文献

[1] 雷明锋, 李倡万, 杨鹏亮, 等. 基于XFEM和响应面法的某地铁车站基坑近接既有已损建筑物施工扰动影响分区[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2026, 46(1): 69-79.
[2] 何旭苏, 李晓蔚, 张仕林, 等. 地铁隧站同步建造下暗挖车站及后行TBM施工对先行TBM管片结构力学行为影响规律研究[J]. 铁道标准设计: 1-15.
https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202507020001, 2026-08-31.
[3] 蒋桂山, 江益辉, 张慧琴, 等. 暗挖隧道爆破施工对近接地铁车站扰动影响数值模拟分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2025, 28(8): 72-81.
[4] 加瑞, 杨岗, 郑刚, 等. 盾构隧道施工扰动对隧道与车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2025, 47(1): 69-81.
[5] 陈建华, 李明皓, 李兆平, 等. 暗挖地铁车站空间交叉部位施工对地层管线变形影响及控制措施研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2020, 64(11): 104-109.
[6] 张攀, 杨双锁. 太原河漫滩地区深基坑施工扰动效应研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(10): 277-280.
[7] 高英林. 上海轨道交通12号线工程设计难点与技术措施[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2017, 20(1): 128-132.
[8] 王剑晨, 张顶立, 张成平, 等. 浅埋暗挖车站上穿施工影响的既有隧道变形规律[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2014, 38(1): 8-12.
[9] 孙统立, 李浩, 韦良文. 多圆盾构土体位移特征及其应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2012, 49(5): 34-38+43.
[10] 李恩璞, 李培楠, 梁利, 等. 基坑明挖施工对正上方既有轻轨车站扰动分析[J]. 西北地震学报, 2011, 33(S1): 270-273+280.
[11] 李奎, 李志业, 高波. 既有地铁车站结构安全性评估方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(4): 1193-1199.